In court, Rainer made a song and dance about how sorry he is, that he didn't mean to insult the cops and so on. Part of the reason why the judge was so pissed off at Rainer, was his attitude towards cops doing their best to protect him from the effects of his own idiocy... but he meekly paddled back, tried to weasel his way out and his lawyer claimed that it was spur of the moments things, misunderstandings and so on.
What can we make of this promise and his intention of keeping it, is it true or not?
Let's ask Jonathan Frakes:
Here we fucking go. You think insulting cops, calling them incompetent, claiming they deliberately refuse to do their duty, that they play games on their phones instead of helping him and doing their job badly was bad. Hold on to your butts, here's Rainer, mere days after his trial:
Translation:
"And then the statement from another cop, that recently yelled at me and insulted me,
repeatedly, and who threatened me! Then to hear him say
'when you continue doing this, you'll get that in return', which is a threat itself. [scratches armpit] You know [stress sigh] It's not just me bad-mouthing the cops and it's not just me being insulted by the cops or the cops by me, yeah, it's the whole situation that's shit."
There you fucking have it. Not just an insult. This time it's outright
libel and defamation by accusing them of
very severe crimes against him. Online. To an audience of 1.5k people. At best 3 days after he was sentenced to prison over exactly the same shit. Words fucking fail me. I really hope this shit comes back to slap him in his face as hard as legally possible.
Libel is treated the same as insulting someone and in this case could be punished with up to 2 years of prisontime alone. Given that he's a repeat-offender that commits this crime less than 72 hours after being punished for just that, there is no fucking way they'd not throw the book at him.
Wrongfully accusing someone publically of breaking the law can land you up to 5 fucking years of tard-time-out. Hard to make this stick, since his intention has to evidently be to get the other person into actual legal trouble, but the libel alone could be used to double his sentence.
And this is just a tiny snippet of one stream. I would not doubt that he's been doing this in his streams every day now... and every single stream is yet one more instance that can be brought to court individually.
So here's me hoping for another round in court, this time over his repeat offense of libel and then soon thereafter tax fraud.
Man muss auch sagen, dass sein Anwalt kräftig auf die Tränendrüse gedrückt hat, in Rainers Namen Versprechungen und Ankündigungen geliefert hat und Rainer das alles mit einigen kurzen Sätzen direkt wieder eingerissen hat.
Er hat nunmal nicht die Absicht, sich oder sein Leben grundlegend zu ändern, er hat keine Einsicht in dem, was ihm vorgeworfen wird. Und zu guter Letzt: Der Anwalt sagte, wie sehr Rainer darunter leidet, dass er sein Elternhaus verkaufen muss, dass ihm der Weggang aus seinem Heimatdorf schwer fällt und so weiter und so fort. Was macht Rainer direkt im Abschlussplädoyer? Er betont, dass er das Haus problemlos verscherbeln konnte, weil ihm nichts mehr dran liegt und sich drauf freut, aus dem Dorf wegzukommen. Hauptsache #unbesiegt halt.
Das Angebot der Verwaltung, die Schimmelschanze zu erstehen, gab es schon seit Jahren... warum also erst jetzt? Da wird die Richterin aus gutem Grund hellhörig. Zusammen mit dem ganzen anderen Stuss ist einfach glasklar, dass der Drache so weitermachen wird. Und wie die Staatsanwältin so schön klarstellte: Es geht ja nicht nur um den Tatort Schimmelschanze, sondern auch um den Tatort Internet.
