Dragonsnow / DrDragonTim / Snowdragon6450, and the Changed Community - Chinese Furry Shotacon artist and game developer behind Changed, the Furry EPI game responsible for minors getting exposed to transformation fetishism.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
It seems he has just been playing "cobblemon" instead of actually working on Changed.
1741208174517.png

This is a game "developer" that people call "great".
 
Also regarding Jax not going as hard on Dragonsnow as he does with Charem I suspect that is likely because compared to Charem who did have a large amount of evidence against him, Dragonsnow's case is more tricky since a lot of the issues with him is more down how he manages Changed and makes him look a lot more irresponsible in comparison to Charem who was doing this stuff intentionally.

there likely is more to it but that's my guess on that
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: JesusChristDenton
Also regarding Jax not going as hard on Dragonsnow as he does with Charem I suspect that is likely because compared to Charem who did have a large amount of evidence against him, Dragonsnow's case is more tricky since a lot of the issues with him is more down how he manages Changed and makes him look a lot more irresponsible in comparison to Charem who was doing this stuff intentionally.

there likely is more to it but that's my guess on that
I honestly think its due to negligence. He won't go hard on a piss fetishist paedophile so I don't know man.
 
Given the strange mention of Twitter Zeitgeist from a furry in this context, I say this is definitely someone who's big on shota. It's one of the cliches they always use in their argumentation, they whine about "Muh Twitter" even pre-Musk, even if they're the wokest piece of shit on earth. I can't really state it clearly because I have only half a clue what they rave about, but it's some shit about how they like to (falsely?) take credit for exposing "the real pedophiles" that are on twitter and they use this to insinuate that their detractors are "the real pedophiles". Typical LoliShotacon bullshit.

To be fair, what were we expecting from a furry called Rape Axe?
"Changed is NOT a porn game guys!11!11 I swear!!!!" What about when Colin, a fifteen year old, gets raped and mounted? Or what about the many genderswap "transfurs" in the game? Or what about how that "fetal pornography" IS BACK IN CHANGED SPECIAL?
It's the typical way these scum operate. They basically just lie through their teeth and gaslight openly. Their MO here is to just deny everything profusely in hopes that they'll fool enough naive children that are willing to take everything they say at face value because they lack the knowledge on what's going on here. These people will never admit to DragonSnow's rampant cock transformation fetish and even if you got them to acknowledge it AND fetal pornography, they would make a convenient excuse as to how this isn't the clearest display of his motives with making Changed.
"Pure fucking brimstone"
Totally not a fetish game guys. Ignore everything about how the author has a boxer shorts and a shotacon fetish, totally not a fetish game guys!
 
I've been thinking about something and kinda realized that dragonsnow barely made any responses about his allegations during the mrow era. he just let his fans defend him hard.
It was likely a mix of Mrow saying the allegations in a way that sounded like he was having a breakdown and also because dragonsnow don't really care.
Also been thinking about the Changed is not porn statement and don't think most of the ppl saying it isn't don't realize the game was specifically made pretty much for Dragonsnow's sexual desires as not only is the fetish stuff the only well-developed part of his game(basically the part he put a lot more time into) compared to other parts of his game. Not to mention when he says personal entertainment given the kind of contents Changed got going on it's not too far off to say it's the kind where jacks off to it and in that kind of sense that would make it a porn game as it was made more out of arousal than for story and especially for gameplay reasons.

what I find funny about eldritch and most of the comments in both of these posts, is that they never talk about or even mention the fetal porn that was featured in shock's video.

call me crazy but I'm convinced they're completely denying it being a thing.
also looking back at the Thread it's also interesting how they are basically saying it's true but due to shock's video being more negative or something along those lines and weirdly enough generalizing anti furs in the same way furries tend to be generalized which at that point is like have they heard the phrase two wrongs don't make a right?

Like they pretty much are saying it's mostly correct/not inaccurate but video should have been more humanizing.
 
It was likely a mix of Mrow saying the allegations in a way that sounded like he was having a breakdown and also because dragonsnow don't really care.
I feel like it's more so dragonsnow avoiding taking responsibility and likely knowing that he's completely defenseless without his fans.

Also been thinking about the Changed is not porn statement and don't think most of the ppl saying it isn't don't realize the game was specifically made pretty much for Dragonsnow's sexual desires as not only is the fetish stuff the only well-developed part of his game(basically the part he put a lot more time into) compared to other parts of his game. Not to mention when he says personal entertainment given the kind of contents Changed got going on it's not too far off to say it's the kind where jacks off to it and in that kind of sense that would make it a porn game as it was made more out of arousal than for story and especially for gameplay reasons.
to me, changed felt like a non con fetish game where it basically does is glorify non con stuff in a bad way. and if you remove all of the fetish stuff in the game, it would end up being a mediocre furry game.

also looking back at the Thread it's also interesting how they are basically saying it's true but due to shock's video being more negative or something along those lines and weirdly enough generalizing anti furs in the same way furries tend to be generalized which at that point is like have they heard the phrase two wrongs don't make a right?
sounds silly to be honest, even with the info being correct, including the pedophilic fetal porn, they'd still support him?

Like they pretty much are saying it's mostly correct/not inaccurate but video should have been more humanizing.
to be honest, shock sounds less hateful and more so critical, yeah there moments of him sounding hateful here and there in his video, but it wasn't hateful as mrow. and I feel like the people in the thread were kinda sensitive to shock's statements.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Maxwell Carter
for that third part, it's interesting how in the thread they did mention shock didn't cover jewwario stuff, but they also didn't appear to acknowledge or even look specifically into the fetal porn part like that would be odd not to also recognize that aswell right? so regrading that third one I suspect they still support him more out of a mixture of well escape reasons and one of those reasons I mentioned where there's a good chance a lot of these people are artist who never really played the game themselves or at least played it long enough to get to the parts where it does show the problematic material
 
I found a tweet where someone complained about a section in special edition making little to no sense.
1742241077074.png

and rapax tries to defend it like the usual.
1742241597168.png

and during the argument, this happened.
1742241843506.png

and not long after that, the argument ends.
1742242223947.png

so basically, rapax assumed that they're a "roblox fanboy" cause they sent one roblox related image? how does that even work??

Link. Xcancel link. Archive.
 
I found a tweet where someone complained about a section in special edition making little to no sense.
View attachment 7103751

and rapax tries to defend it like the usual.
View attachment 7103787

and during the argument, this happened.
View attachment 7103810

and not long after that, the argument ends.
View attachment 7103835

so basically, rapax assumed that they're a "roblox fanboy" cause they sent one roblox related image? how does that even work??

Link. Xcancel link. Archive.
The funny thing is when you think about the entire game's premise regarding the cure part. the whole furry is the cure approach is probably the worst cure Idea I've seen in a long time like imagine using the Thing or the Blob to cure a super version of Marburg which already did not end well in the plot and it won't shock me if the cure was more about Curing humanity from the humans rather curing the disease from the humans.
 
The funny thing is when you think about the entire game's premise regarding the cure part. the whole furry is the cure approach is probably the worst cure Idea I've seen in a long time like imagine using the Thing or the Blob to cure a super version of Marburg which already did not end well in the plot and it won't shock me if the cure was more about Curing humanity from the humans rather curing the disease from the humans.
you could say it's the final solution to the human question...
 
regarding the tweet I shared earlier, does rapax have an external hard drive where it has screenshots of him arguing with people over the years? cause like who the fuck goes out of their way to screenshot someone complaining about bad writing in the game, and use it as prime example?
 
regarding the tweet I shared earlier, does rapax have an external hard drive where it has screenshots of him arguing with people over the years? cause like who the fuck goes out of their way to screenshot someone complaining about bad writing in the game, and use it as prime example?
No. The hard drive would be dedicated to child porn.
 
looked around and found some interesting stuff from two discussions between a user and the fanbase with the user in question being concerned about the morality of Changed and some other stuff.



any thoughts on this?

well one of the interesting things is there definitely appears to be some form of gaslighting going on specifically from the ones who are pro changed
 
Last edited by a moderator:
looked around and found some interesting stuff from two discussions between a user and the fanbase with the user in question being concerned about the morality of Changed and some other stuff.



any thoughts on this?
good god the amount of people defending the game in the second discussion page is just mind boggling.

1742261431298.png
1742261639269.png

say what you want about changed. but to me, it is a fetish game that glorifies non con stuff.
 
weirdly enough generalizing anti furs in the same way furries tend to be generalized which at that point is like have they heard the phrase two wrongs don't make a right?
To be fair though, the generalizations of furries are pretty much always true. I think people just like to rub it in their face because of how much furries like to lie about it somehow not being the case. If they were more honest and took responsibility for their crap, they would probably be a lot less resented. But it goes against the fandom ideology to be a secretive coomer, they want their crap pretty much near-mainstream and accepted everywhere so they can have their fag-utopia or whatever and they don't usually get along with anyone that thinks they should just keep it to their private spaces and the only ones who will are already questioning their own loyalties.
even with the info being correct, including the pedophilic fetal porn, they'd still support him?
What do you expect? There's always people with these negative IQ crazy fans like that who will stick to them like glue and stand by them through whatever controversy no matter how much the writing is on the wall. People who act like this may be children.
the whole furry is the cure approach is probably the worst cure Idea I've seen in a long time
There's a lot of reasons why the plot fundamentally makes no sense, contradicts itself and insists on a forced narrative. But in a vision of this game where the plot isn't written in a fit of retardation, K would just be a full of shit misanthrope who is feeding you lies and likely may have been responsible for the plague to begin with. He comes across as the kind of guy that wants to ethnically cleanse the "blight" that is humanity (by making them all into sex-crazed furries). I mean the turret room dialog is telling enough about how gleefully he boasts about how he turned countless people into retarded submissive dog-men during the riots. And in a superior vision of this game, you should be able to kill him even if it means dying in the process. He deserves it. But the creator is on his side so he's going to be a gary stu somehow.
good god the amount of people defending the game in the second discussion page is just mind boggling.
Yeah I've seen this tactic before. One thing they like to do is to try to flip it around on you and try to accuse you of being the perverted one for seeing it for how it really is. It's manipulative and deceitful because it messes with the typical person that would criticize their degeneracy, but so transparently so that you KNOW they're full of shit and them resorting to this tactic is a red flag that they are lying.
 
There's a lot of reasons why the plot fundamentally makes no sense, contradicts itself and insists on a forced narrative. But in a vision of this game where the plot isn't written in a fit of retardation, K would just be a full of shit misanthrope who is feeding you lies and likely may have been responsible for the plague to begin with. He comes across as the kind of guy that wants to ethnically cleanse the "blight" that is humanity (by making them all into sex-crazed furries). I mean the turret room dialog is telling enough about how gleefully he boasts about how he turned countless people into retarded submissive dog-men during the riots. And in a superior vision of this game, you should be able to kill him even if it means dying in the process. He deserves it. But the creator is on his side so he's going to be a gary stu somehow.
changed groomer.png
"noooo it is all for the greater good haha"
"what do you mean you're 15? all characters are 18+ haha"
"does the hidden danger know about me???"
Yeah I've seen this tactic before. One thing they like to do is to try to flip it around on you and try to accuse you of being the perverted one for seeing it for how it really is. It's manipulative and deceitful because it messes with the typical person that would criticize their degeneracy, but so transparently so that you KNOW they're full of shit and them resorting to this tactic is a red flag that they are lying.
Best part is how these sorts of people like to constantly sperg out about "BEING GASLIGHTED" by others, perfect example of "It's okay when WE do it!".
 
Back