Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

WIkipedos were fast to act on Elizabeth II's death
I kneal.png
This actually got a laugh out of me when it was up. I'm sure there are minor edit skirmishes on several pages related to her now.
Übertroon said:
What they've done to the lead paragraph for kiwifarms is quite something to behold
View attachment 3682465
Click to expand...
Shocked they didn't toss in far right at that rate.
 
  • Like
  • Lunacy
  • Feels
Reactions: Haffhart, Strange Wilderness, lolcow yoghurt and 5 others
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Haffhart, Flaming Insignias, Vecr and 2 others
Wikipedia already going after our new, gracious host:

Nicholas Lim (entrepreneur) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Zero points for guessing who is behind its current form.

What's funny is, unless he's done something significantly of note, there is close to ZERO reason as to why Lim warrants a Wikipedia page. Molly White maybe based on how much of her life she has given towards this petty vendetta against us, but Lim is several magnitudes of significance below even her.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, Vecr, Corpun and 3 others
Dan Schneider said:
View attachment 3688726
Imagine taking a picture of your dick getting electrocuted, then proceed to post it on Creative commons under the "public domain". There is a lot more of this shit too, though this one was on the CBT article.
Click to expand...
Pretty typical stuff. Wikimedia Commons has always been infamous as a dumping ground for exhibitionists posting pictures of their genitals.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: supremeautismo, Sparkling Yuzu, scathefire and 4 others
Becky McDonald said:
Wikipedia already going after our new, gracious host:

Nicholas Lim (entrepreneur) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Zero points for guessing who is behind its current form.

What's funny is, unless he's done something significantly of note, there is close to ZERO reason as to why Lim warrants a Wikipedia page. Molly White maybe based on how much of her life she has given towards this petty vendetta against us, but Lim is several magnitudes of significance below even her.
Click to expand...

Going through Mollys twitter follows/followers, she already has numerous links to various senior editors in journalism. She could simply ask her friends to write articles to target her ideological opponents (which they'd be happy to do), and then add them to the wikipedia article. Cementing them as the TRUTH™.

"No bad tactics. Only bad targets"
 
  • Horrifying
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, Phil The Thrill, I Love Huge Long Chode and 5 others
Becky McDonald said:
Wikipedia already going after our new, gracious host:

Nicholas Lim (entrepreneur) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Zero points for guessing who is behind its current form.

What's funny is, unless he's done something significantly of note, there is close to ZERO reason as to why Lim warrants a Wikipedia page. Molly White maybe based on how much of her life she has given towards this petty vendetta against us, but Lim is several magnitudes of significance below even her.
Click to expand...
Molly White has a huge forehead and I would not fuck her.

If she is smart enough to access TOR I expect to be in a twitter screencap tomorrow.
 
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, lolcow yoghurt and murph
Corpun said:
Molly White has a huge forehead and I would not fuck her.

If she is smart enough to access TOR I expect to be in a twitter screencap tomorrow.
Click to expand...
She can't stay away because the thought of far-right Nazis posting about her makes her wet. She's probably flicking her bean while looking at my profile right now. DM me on here Molly and I'll gladly fuck you while we listen to the best of Hitler's speeches.
 
  • Like
  • Islamic Content
  • Horrifying
Reactions: SirPolux, Sparkling Yuzu, murph and 10 others
There is now an active RfC on whether to link to the Kiwi Farms on its own article. There are two camps: one says an encyclopedia article about a website should of course include its URL as part of its coverage; the other says, well, I don't like the website, so delete the URL. The link is still absent while this discussion is happening, which probably violates policy that the deletion should be reverted till consensus is reached. This is all somewhat academic while .net is down.

Talk:Kiwi Farms - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

Also, Null's photo has been replaced.

ETA: Someone on the talk page grovelled in apology for "misgendering" Keffals.
 
  • Informative
  • Lunacy
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Sparkling Yuzu, murph, Flaming Insignias and 3 others
J.J. McCullough did a video on wikipedia today and man are people seething over it, he basically called it poorly written trash, that hides behind a byzantine bureaucracy with0 complex overly broad rules, that allows it to be incredibly biased while still maintaining the veneer of neutrality.
 
Last edited:
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Slideshow Bill, supremeautismo, Sparkling Yuzu and 8 others
JJLiautaud said:
J.J. McCullough did a video on wikipedia today and man are people seething over it, he basically called it poorly written trash, that hides behind a byzantine bureaucracy with0 complex overly broad rules, that allows it to be incredibly biased while still maintaining the veneer of neutrality.
Click to expand...

That was incredible, man. McCullough always struck me as having the aesthetic of a left-wing creator, which is why I'm often pleasantly surprised when he presents the occasional based and redpilled talking point in a way that's acceptable to his (assumedly mainstream) audience. And the way he covers both sides of an issue with the same journalistic tone. McCullough is a rare gem of a left-leaning journalist who never abandoned his critical thinking skills and doesn't let his biases get in the way of objective reporting. Why can't they all be like that?

Übertroon said:
What they've done to the lead paragraph for kiwifarms is quite something to behold
View attachment 3682465
Click to expand...

We live inside their heads so much. And yet, Chris is still never referred to by name.

The most documented person in history, and he's only "a webcomic artist" as far as Wikipedia is concerned. Yet unremarkable athletes get their own page. Fucking NEAR gets a shout-out on KF's article but not him? What's muh boy Chris gotta do to get a mention on Wikipedia? He's already covered in some mainstream papers for Chris(t)'s sake!
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Sparkling Yuzu, Da Capo, Haffhart and 7 others
DoubleD said:
That was incredible, man. McCullough always struck me as having the aesthetic of a left-wing creator, which is why I'm often pleasantly surprised when he presents the occasional based and redpilled talking point in a way that's acceptable to his (assumedly mainstream) audience. And the way he covers both sides of an issue with the same journalistic tone. McCullough is a rare gem of a left-leaning journalist who never abandoned his critical thinking skills and doesn't let his biases get in the way of objective reporting. Why can't they all be like that?



We live inside their heads so much. And yet, Chris is still never referred to by name.

The most documented person in history, and he's only "a webcomic artist" as far as Wikipedia is concerned. Yet unremarkable athletes get their own page. Fucking NEAR gets a shout-out on KF's article but not him? What's muh boy Chris gotta do to get a mention on Wikipedia? He's already covered in some mainstream papers for Chris(t)'s sake!
Click to expand...
The only logical reason why TOW won't mention him is because Wikipedia's core circle is composed of severely autistic people. Like they spend 8-10 hours a day moderating a site for what purpose? It is nothing but a power fantasy of controlling information. Acknowledging Chris would mean that people are free to bully you on the internet. Check the Ruckersville article: so many edit summaries were purged by admins because they mentioned him. Unless he becomes an hero and tries to high score, they will likely never mention him even if academic articles come out analyzing him.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Sparkling Yuzu, murph, Francine StripeCheer and 2 others
DoubleD said:
That was incredible, man. McCullough always struck me as having the aesthetic of a left-wing creator, which is why I'm often pleasantly surprised when he presents the occasional based and redpilled talking point in a way that's acceptable to his (assumedly mainstream) audience. And the way he covers both sides of an issue with the same journalistic tone. McCullough is a rare gem of a left-leaning journalist who never abandoned his critical thinking skills and doesn't let his biases get in the way of objective reporting. Why can't they all be like that?



We live inside their heads so much. And yet, Chris is still never referred to by name.

The most documented person in history, and he's only "a webcomic artist" as far as Wikipedia is concerned. Yet unremarkable athletes get their own page. Fucking NEAR gets a shout-out on KF's article but not him? What's muh boy Chris gotta do to get a mention on Wikipedia? He's already covered in some mainstream papers for Chris(t)'s sake!
Click to expand...
Mainly because hes actually a right leaning journalist, shocker I know.
Dan Schneider said:
The only logical reason why TOW won't mention him is because Wikipedia's core circle is composed of severely autistic people. Like they spend 8-10 hours a day moderating a site for what purpose? It is nothing but a power fantasy of controlling information. Acknowledging Chris would mean that people are free to bully you on the internet. Check the Ruckersville article: so many edit summaries were purged by admins because they mentioned him. Unless he becomes an hero and tries to high score, they will likely never mention him even if academic articles come out analyzing him.
Click to expand...
There's a whole academic book discussing chris-chan, it is actually pretty damn good from reviews I've read, it was written pre-incest saga, and published like a month before the whole thing went down.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: supremeautismo, Sparkling Yuzu, woowie queen and 4 others
That JJ video reminds me I really need to bookmark some encyclopedia websites.
 
Becky McDonald said:
Wikipedia already going after our new, gracious host:

Nicholas Lim (entrepreneur) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Zero points for guessing who is behind its current form.
Click to expand...

Molly White is also the original creator/author of the article on Lim, and continues to be the main contributor. So there is little doubt that it was created as an attack article. Which gives me an idea...


..would you look at that, guess who created the Rob Monster article?


Probably if I checked Peter Thiel, you would probably see her editing it as well, though he is prominent enough to have not been created just as an attack article like Monster/Lim were.
 
  • Like
Reactions: murph, Flaming Insignias, 9Style and 1 other person
From the Rob Monster talk page where Molly is getting called out for writing a blatant attack article
View attachment 3689746
Check out that passive aggressive last paragraph. You're not only a total cunt Molly but you're just objectively bad at being a Wiki editor. You are completely unable to put your own unhinged biases aside when you write. You are so intensely brainwashed that you think slandering random people as Nazi's is a win for "the cause".
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: murph, Flaming Insignias, 9Style and 1 other person
JJLiautaud said:
J.J. McCullough did a video on wikipedia today and man are people seething over it, he basically called it poorly written trash, that hides behind a byzantine bureaucracy with0 complex overly broad rules, that allows it to be incredibly biased while still maintaining the veneer of neutrality.
Click to expand...
The first 5 minutes were good, but in my opinion, he spends too long rambling and focusing on stuff that doesn't really matter.

There is a Simple English Wikipedia that honestly in many cases should be the main English page for a lot of articles. He raises a lot of salient points, namely how Wikipedia has effectively monopolised the sharing and dissemination of information on the internet, with citogenesis becoming ever more common, but he says very little about the website's actual problems and their root causes. He annoyingly tiptoes around the edge, and doesn't mention anything of what Larry Sanger said, who has been fighting this fight quite a bit longer than most of us.

If he namedropped Molly White for instance, that would have been amazing. If he mentioned how literal whos like her and Unidan get articles because they are incestuous little cunts of infinitely lower relevance than the likes of CWC, that would have also been great. If he mentioned how articles focusing on certain controversial issues along the lines of GamerGate, Pizzagate, and a handful of select others (i.e. us) take a purposefully naive, almost braindead stance that deliberately misconstrue the basic facts which anyone can learn if they are able to find non-establishment sources, then that would have been magnificent.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Da Capo, Idiot Asshole, DoubleD and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back