Large
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2018
Dumb Shit on Wikipedia
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
-
🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2022
In all my years, I have never seen such a horrifically-written attempt at a Wikipedia article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_Challenge
And in case you're wondering, the page has looked like that since December 2006. Most of the drivers mentioned on the then-current East Coast Honda Challenge have likely long since retired.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_Challenge
And in case you're wondering, the page has looked like that since December 2006. Most of the drivers mentioned on the then-current East Coast Honda Challenge have likely long since retired.
Michaelsoft
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2019
Can anyone here help Bob Mattie find Neal?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Unusual_requests#neal_(From_Wikipedia:Help_desk)
https://archive.ph/SlGm5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Unusual_requests#neal_(From_Wikipedia:Help_desk)
https://archive.ph/SlGm5
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2021
As of September, Wikimedia Commons has two photographs of Kiwi Farms owner Final Boss of Transphobes, Joshua Moon. That could be about to change, however, as one of them (the one of him holding a bible)[archive] has been nominated for deletion – allegedly for copyright reasons, although the timing is suspicious.
Original page (archive)
If you need any help translating Retard: the rationale for deletion is that it's a still from a (now deleted) MATI stream, which was marked as CC-BY when it was reposted on the backup channel. And this should have made the image CC-BY too, but Wikipetards still aren't sure if the official-looking Kiwi Farms Archive was actually maintained by a fan and, if so, whether Josh actually intended to release the stream and image as CC-BY.
It's funny how these people aren't above lying about him and smearing his name into the dirt, even when our "original research" clearly contradicts the media's lies about Byuu – but they will respecc the eff out of an image copyright that Josh doesn't intend on contesting when it would conveniently result in there being less of him around.
But of course, you can never be too careful of a copyright violation. This user in particular seemed fucking psychotic with the thought that Josh might attempt something using... less than legal methods, but she doesn't go on to specify further. She probably thinks he'll dox the personal info of every Wikipedia editor – "not to mention what other users of the site might do".
Well, Stephanie, as one of these other users of the site, I'd like to know what it is you think we're going to do – call the fucking Feds? They're on your side anyway.
Original page (archive)
If you need any help translating Retard: the rationale for deletion is that it's a still from a (now deleted) MATI stream, which was marked as CC-BY when it was reposted on the backup channel. And this should have made the image CC-BY too, but Wikipetards still aren't sure if the official-looking Kiwi Farms Archive was actually maintained by a fan and, if so, whether Josh actually intended to release the stream and image as CC-BY.
It's funny how these people aren't above lying about him and smearing his name into the dirt, even when our "original research" clearly contradicts the media's lies about Byuu – but they will respecc the eff out of an image copyright that Josh doesn't intend on contesting when it would conveniently result in there being less of him around.
But of course, you can never be too careful of a copyright violation. This user in particular seemed fucking psychotic with the thought that Josh might attempt something using... less than legal methods, but she doesn't go on to specify further. She probably thinks he'll dox the personal info of every Wikipedia editor – "not to mention what other users of the site might do".
Well, Stephanie, as one of these other users of the site, I'd like to know what it is you think we're going to do – call the fucking Feds? They're on your side anyway.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2022
That image has been reposted more than Goatse. I have no clue why they are so scared of posting his picture.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
To gaze upon the face of Jersh is to know fear, apparently. Instead of just noticing he's a pretty generic looking white guy.
Fictional Character
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2020
If you look at the image for more than ten seconds, you'll turn into a Nazi transphobe. It's that powerful.
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2019
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2022
I wonder if it has to do with the faggy Kflay hoodie? She has to be aware of the farms and Josh being a fan. Maybe her team reached out to Wikipedia and asked for that pic to be deleted and the rest is theatrics for her "protection"? Josh had her song linked to the front page a bit back and kiwis left messages on the original YouTube video, so timing fits.
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2022
How long before Conor McKnight gets a write-up by GorillaWarfare, do you guys reckon?
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2022
Is he even a notable figure? Oh that's right Wikipedos ignore their standards when they want to shit on people they don't like.
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2021
If they were smart they'd use an image of @Null when he was chunky. Issue is that I think Hotwheels is in that all of those and Hotwheels would spaz out and use his Wikipedia Janny powers to quash it.
Null you better lose some weight if the Chris-chan lawyer calls you as a character witness. Also, if called as a witness drop shit about Byuu into the legal record when explaining the website.
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2021
No clue if it's been mentioned in this thread before so apologies if it's old news/not the best thread for it.
I occasionally have this site on in the background while I work/shitpost and it occasionally comes up with some neat pages, plus the sounds are pretty. TL;DR is whenever there is an edit on a Wikipedia page, this site has a circle that shows up with a musical ding to match. The bigger the circle/the deeper the pitch of the ding, the bigger the edit. (I'd recommend turning off new user announcements as it's loud as fuck and never stops, so use this URL or just scroll down a bit and tick the box to turn it off.) White circles are registered editors, green is unregistered and purple is bot edits.
You can then click the circle which will take you to a page that details what was removed/added/edited on the page that lead to the notification, and of course from there you can look at the full page or go somewhere else that might be of interest to you as you find it.
This one just showed up:
Lmao/A
I occasionally have this site on in the background while I work/shitpost and it occasionally comes up with some neat pages, plus the sounds are pretty. TL;DR is whenever there is an edit on a Wikipedia page, this site has a circle that shows up with a musical ding to match. The bigger the circle/the deeper the pitch of the ding, the bigger the edit. (I'd recommend turning off new user announcements as it's loud as fuck and never stops, so use this URL or just scroll down a bit and tick the box to turn it off.) White circles are registered editors, green is unregistered and purple is bot edits.
You can then click the circle which will take you to a page that details what was removed/added/edited on the page that lead to the notification, and of course from there you can look at the full page or go somewhere else that might be of interest to you as you find it.
This one just showed up:
Lmao/A
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2017
They also ignore their standards when it's people they do like too (such as John "Brianna Wu" Flynt) or their favorite astroturfed memes like "Sealioning".
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2015
The fact that Brianna Wu has a 1513 word article with two pictures despite only being known for being passively involved in Gamergate drama (He wasn't even the main "victim" Zoe Quinn was Wu was an afterthought) from 8 years ago is all you need to know about Wikipedia favoritism. Somehow Wu is notable but Chris Chan isn't.
Who did he pay off or threaten to get such good coverage by the way? John seems to have serious connections in the tech industry.
Who did he pay off or threaten to get such good coverage by the way? John seems to have serious connections in the tech industry.
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2022
They all fucking do. Keffals, Yaniv and Challenor to name a few. They have the power to do things online that normal netizens couldn't even fathom. They can get your sites pulled, your accounts banned, all the way up to making the very mention of your name cause an instant shadowban.
And yeah, it's obvious Wikipedia's "Notability" caveat is complete bullshit. Can anyone explain how someone like Salvator Xuereb isn't notable enough for a wiki article, despite having appeared in shows and movies like 24, Pensacola: Wings of Gold (where he played a main character, and is the only actor on that show not to have a page), and Burning Dog, an indie film which has 100% on RottenTomatoes? Even his fucking surname should be notable enough for inclusion considering it's a very rare Maltese name of nobility.
Is Xuereb really less notable than someone like Ken Richardson for instance, an F1 driver who made one entry all the way back in the 1950s and never even made the grid because he wasn't experienced enough to drive a race car?
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2022
Somehow the murder of a random New York woman is more notable than Chris Chan's unusual crime that got international reporting.
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2015
The sheer amount of random violence against Asian's by blacks is genuinely disturbing and a rabbit hole I was only recently introduced to. It's really no wonder they hate blacks so much.
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2022
They have long ran out of excuses at this point. The unspoken rule at Wikipedia is simple and clear-cut; Chris-Chan can never have an article.
There are so many technicalities he could be listed for, whether that's one of the most documented people to have ever lived, to being one of the most well-known internet personalities of all time, or something as simple as how KiwiFarms got its start.
They genuinely do not care. Chris-Chan is their sacred cow. He can NEVER have an article. He could commit mass-murder and still be relegated to a footnote.
Rooftop Koreans kicked it all off. Pretty much every racially-motivated attack on Asians by blacks since the early 1990s was consciously or sub-consciously influenced by the fact Koreans dared to protect their own businesses. They couldn't believe there were people out there who wouldn't let them be criminals. So for the past 30 years, they have harboured this grudge. They view Asians as legitimate threats against their lives.
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2021
How much of it is known to be racially motivated though? I'm sure some of it is, but there's simply a vast amount of random violence by blacks period, and some victims of it will be Asian. (It's hushed up when victims are white, of course.) It's similar to BLM, where every bad thing that happens to a black is automatically assumed to be because they're black, even though there's almost never any evidence of racial bias. The media is similarly fabricating a mostly imaginary wave of anti-Asian violence.
It's not even unspoken. They've said the article would be a tool of harassment and so shouldn't exist.
I doubt many blacks today are even subconsciously influenced by rooftop Koreans, and anyway the violence predates the LA riots.
Probably a lot of racial animus is due to how many Asians set up businesses such as liquor stores in black neighborhoods. The idle poor blacks see the Asians' relative prosperity and resent it. They don't of course connect it to hard work vs. doing nothing all day, and naturally the journalistic elite actively fosters the idea that all wealth discrepancies are due to racism.
The coronavirus also probably did make this worse.