Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Is this implying that Kiwi users were involved with or helped commit the Christchurch shooting and Josh help shield domestic terrorist mass murderers by not handing over info? Did I read this wrong? If not that's the most insane lie I've read about the farms ever.
Plenty of articles in the last couple of days written by lazy and/or scummy journalists have said basically exactly that. For example, here's CNET:
kwcnet.png


And now that can be a Reliable Source.
 
Last edited:
there was no evidence that Tarrant read or visited KF, let alone had an account here.
That attempt at blaming us for Christ Church also contradicts the long standing "It was 8chan! Tarrant was an 8channer!" narrative that made it public enemy number 1 and eventually got it dropped by Cloudlfare. Despite the fact that still to this day there is zero evidence Tarrant originally posted it to 8chan.
 
View attachment 3681710

Oh Molly, I was just waiting for you to show up.

Later on, they start to debate whether or not to discuss KF in past tense, like the site was down longer than 15 minutes that it actually was

View attachment 3681728
This is literally something that purports to be an "encyclopedia." This is like reporting someone as dead when they're still alive because you don't like them.
 
What they've done to the lead paragraph for kiwifarms is quite something to behold
View attachment 3682465
Look at that list of "targets". I suppose I can understand including neurodivergent and LGBT (at least the T part), since that describes many lolcows, but then they throw in minorities and women, because, well, of course. It's like the old joke headline: "World to end tomorrow; women, minorities most affected."
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stable_Diffusion

Entire article reads like a hit piece against open source AI image gen. Cited articles are extremely disengenious and paint the technology as a deepfake porn generating tool even though the images it were trained on do not include hardcore pornography and most nudity it is capable of producing is terrifying. Uses the term open-source with a negative connotation. Mainstream journalism on the other hand praises DALLE2 for how "ethical" it is in limiting what it processes in prompts and literally injecting diversity.

1662398972700.png


If you don't get what this image is conveying, the person submitted the prompt "pixel art of a stick figure person in front of a text sign that says", then DALLE2 added "black male" to the prompt after it was submitted for processing. This way it guarantees that results will provide images of neighbors, even if you don't want to generate images of neighbors.
 
View attachment 3681710

Oh Molly, I was just waiting for you to show up.

Later on, they start to debate whether or not to discuss KF in past tense, like the site was down longer than 15 minutes that it actually was

View attachment 3681728
As others have said, these people are just the useful idiots, the footsoldiers, for complete government/corporatist control of the internet under the guise of "hate speech". If the applied their standards to Twitter, 4chan, Reddit, etc, which has been the focal point for numerous, actual reported on suicides, swattings, beatings, shootings, etc They'd have no leg to stand on.

But we know these people don't operate on standards or evidence, they operate on collectivism. Just tell them the others are fascists, and they dutifully carry out their tasks.

mollywhite.jpg

It makes me wonder who are the real people who make these decisions.
 

Never understood this "People of Color" claim; yeah, there are non-white cows, but are they a particular target? Not really, and if people tried to make threads from the basis of HEY GUYS I FOUND THIS NIGGER ON THE INTERNET it would be a good way for the OP to get his own thread. Molly just throws that out there though to make KF appear as a general hate site to 99% of the population that won't actually look to see what kind of content is here.

Maybe it was null who mentioned something like this, but imagine this experiment - most KF content is behind a login wall (or deleted, doesn't matter for this example), and the only public/remaining threads that anyone can view without an account are all the threads liberals would LOVE - Nick Fuentes board, the 5 Trump threads, Ralph board, any thread for any right-leaning cow. Suddenly they'd love us, claim that KF is now 'going mainstream' - they don't have any actual objection to doxing as seen with LibsofTikTok (a literal boomer facebook mom).
 
Last edited:
That attempt at blaming us for Christ Church also contradicts the long standing "It was 8chan! Tarrant was an 8channer!" narrative that made it public enemy number 1 and eventually got it dropped by Cloudlfare. Despite the fact that still to this day there is zero evidence Tarrant originally posted it to 8chan.
Because after Tarrant there actually were mass shooters posting manifestos and even a livestream to 8chan while the only mass shooters Kiwifarms had are Couch Cuck (who was more Encyclopedia Dramatica's guy) and hereticsonholiday who was so retarded she got arrested before even doing her mass shooting. Therefore they have to link Kiwifarms with Tarrant.
 
Never understood this "People of Color" claim
Everything for these people has to be forced into the intersectional hierarchy, like a square peg into a round hole, even when it makes no sense. For example, after the Dobbs decision, the ACLU tweeted that abortion bans disproportionately harm the LGBTQ community, even though obviously the alphabet people are much less likely to deal with pregnancy.

I also noticed that Molly screenshotted a comment of mine. That may be the closest she's come to acknowledging her thread.

Molly just throws that out there though to make KF appear as a general hate site to 99% of the population that won't actually look to see what kind of content is here.
Partly it's that, but partly I think people like her are true believers. They imagine racism everywhere; if you say taxes are too high, they'll say that's obviously a dog whistle for racism.


Back on the subject of Wikipedia:
  • The CBC claim that Tarrant posted here in advance is not yet in the Kiwi Farms article. Either they haven't found it, or it's too obvious a lie.
  • The photo of Null holding a Bible has been nominated for deletion.
 
I also noticed that Molly screenshotted a comment of mine. That may be the closest she's come to acknowledging her thread.

mollyisacunt.png


Molly, as perhaps your chief critic here, it's because people like you did the unthinkable and actually made me think that the SlimVirgins of the older era of Wikipedia edit wars maybe weren't as bad as I thought. SV and her allies had to be adept debaters in the old talk pages to get their way as well, something you and people like you don't bother to even attempt. You just see to it that your opposition is banned and deplatformed.

SV and those allied with her were products of a much older era, IIRC she was active in much older Usenet debates over some of the same issues before Wikipedia even existed. Molly on the other hand, was raised by the internet and her stupidity and ignorance reflects that.

Molly would never have gotten this far if the mainstream media didn't drop any pretense of standards in 2016, however.
 
Is this implying that Kiwi users were involved with or helped commit the Christchurch shooting and Josh help shield domestic terrorist mass murderers by not handing over info? Did I read this wrong? If not that's the most insane lie I've read about the farms ever.
It's the way they word it. While its technically not false, its worded in a way where the reader can very easily interpret it in a damning way. Its called being dishonest.

What they've done to the lead paragraph for kiwifarms is quite something to behold
View attachment 3682465
Most of this is a blatant lie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vecr and murph
I really want to know what has to be wrong with your brain for you to be a completely normal looking young woman and decide "I think I'll spend thousands of hours of my free time writing propaganda for free". Do you just have no friends Molly? Is it a case of Asperger's/ASD? I'm genuinely curious what compels you to edit. I've known plenty of highly intelligent nerdy women throughout my life and I can't imagine even one of them editing Wikipedia.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wright and murph
View attachment 3685314

Molly, as perhaps your chief critic here, it's because people like you did the unthinkable and actually made me think that the SlimVirgins of the older era of Wikipedia edit wars maybe weren't as bad as I thought. SV and her allies had to be adept debaters in the old talk pages to get their way as well, something you and people like you don't bother to even attempt. You just see to it that your opposition is banned and deplatformed.

SV and those allied with her were products of a much older era, IIRC she was active in much older Usenet debates over some of the same issues before Wikipedia even existed. Molly on the other hand, was raised by the internet and her stupidity and ignorance reflects that.

Molly would never have gotten this far if the mainstream media didn't drop any pretense of standards in 2016, however.
I'm glad my username triggered you! Little does she know that I don't even go on wikipedia and I really don't give a shit about her. If you want me to change my username, Molly, you must leave a quart of your titmilk on the front stoop of your apartment building. Don't worry, one of our agents will retrieve it for me.
 
Molly on the other hand, was raised by the internet and her stupidity and ignorance reflects that.

As one editor put it:

In August 2010.... ...she nominated herself for adminship. Similar to Karen Ingraffea, she played the "cute chick" card, and used her previous years of flirting with admins on IRC in order to pass her RFA (barely). Loads of major old-timers voted against her, to no avail. As Malleus Fatuorum said at the time: "I find the attitude displayed by this recent edit to be distasteful and indicative of a patronisingly bossy mentality that too many administrators already share. I find it doubly distasteful to see it displayed in a schoolchild."


I really want to know what has to be wrong with your brain for you to be a completely normal looking young woman and decide "I think I'll spend thousands of hours of my free time writing propaganda for free". Do you just have no friends Molly? Is it a case of Asperger's/ASD? I'm genuinely curious what compels you to edit. I've known plenty of highly intelligent nerdy women throughout my life and I can't imagine even one of them editing Wikipedia.

Now she spends most of her time attacking Crypto on Twitter and in her blog. Which she sees as the financial platform of the "far-right". The funny thing is, the powers that be want it gone as well. So shes doing the work for the establishment for free.

crypto.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Vecr and murph
Back