Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

  • Feels
  • Lunacy
Reactions: From The Uncanny Valley, Splinters RCVD, Josterman and 1 other person
Shmuel Sam Coinsniffer said:
Only caught this one because someone tried to remove it and got reverted: Kenosha Kid is listed under "right-wing terrorism".

View attachment 2669413
Click to expand...
BootlegPopeye said:
They always have this needless line 'after 9/11' because it would obviously distort the (false) point they are attempting to make - that white right wingers cause most terror attacks. But why is 9/11 separated out? 2001 isn't exactly ancient history. Oh, because it would dismantle the bullshit line they are going for.

Yet, you can see that they cite Timothy McVeigh and various Order attacks, all of which happened before 2001. So we can cite pre 2001 stuff when its convenient? It's almost like there isn't a good reason at all to not include 9/11.
Click to expand...
I've noticed this narrative as well. Usually the lines used are something like, "Since 9/11 more dmoestic terrorists have been right wing lunatics than Islamists."

Yeah, because for a good decade the government honed in on Islamist terrorists. Also which group ted to have larger casualty numbers again? I don't need any Fed groomed schizos driving trucks of peace into a Christmas market.
Shmuel Sam Coinsniffer said:
It will be covered in the "He did it even tho he wasn't convicted" tone of the KKK lynchings of early 1900s. Quite interesting that the total opposite case, where Leo Frank was rightfully convicted of raping and murdering a little girl and then tried to pin the blame on his "nigger beast" (defense's words) employee, is treated as innocent in the article because people were, understandably, antisemitic against him, and that makes the conviction null and void and racist.
Click to expand...
This is the rapist pedo that is the reason the ADL and SPLC were founded right? All because all Jews are totally innocent and not victims at all.

How does Wikipedia portray Morgenthau and his insane genocidal plans for Germany?
 
  • Like
Reactions: From The Uncanny Valley, BiggerChungus, Josterman and 2 others
Corpun said:
How does Wikipedia portray Morgenthau and his insane genocidal plans for Germany?
Click to expand...
Intro for Henry Morgenthau.

54c9ea98be67847a0852ba8235ee162b.png


Yeah, that's one way to put it. You could preface Hitler article by stating "He played a major role in shaping foreign policy, support for Japan, helping German refugees, and proposing ("the Holocaust") to prevent Jews from again being a threat".
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: From The Uncanny Valley, Toolbox, BiggerChungus and 5 others
Shmuel Sam Coinsniffer said:
Intro for Henry Morgenthau.

View attachment 2672129

Yeah, that's one way to put it. You could preface Hitler article by stating "He played a major role in shaping foreign policy, support for Japan, helping German refugees, and proposing ("the Holocaust") to prevent Jews from again being a threat".
Click to expand...
Oh hey look I know that guy if his own version of the Marshall plan the body count would rise
 
Oats12345 said:
Isn't John Rhys-Davis a Welsh actor who has played many British characters and is often mistaken for being British. Form what I read he doesn't get angry when people confused him for being British
Click to expand...
You mean he's mistaken for being English. British is the term for anyone from the United Kingdom.
 
  • Like
Reactions: From The Uncanny Valley, UnsufficentBoobage, BluntyBitch and 5 others
Flaming Insignias said:
Someone loves their Zinn. Not a single point of criticism or reference to Zinn being an actual fucking commie.
Click to expand...

That book has misinformed 20+ years worth of students unfortunate enough to have a prof dumb enough to present it as anything more than a long political tract. Basically, everyone the US opposed was ackshoolee the good guys, but aw shucks, they always lose. Really it is just plain anti-American, there is a point you cross when it's just obvious you despise your own country.

And yes, absolutely Zinn was a commie. After he died, the FBI put out his file:

Zinn's File

It's hundreds of pages. When it first came out, I read the whole thing (the old school FBI files make for interesting reading, from what they release, most of these people had good reason to be looked at). Here he is in 1949 (so way earlier than some others) protesting in favor of some commie sponsored Jewish thing:


Screenshot from 2021-11-01 20-58-47.png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: murgatroid, Toolbox, Sicko Hunter and 5 others
So i was playing some HOI4 this weekend as germany and i saw the General who ill always refer to as bandage head Ernst Hell thought heres an interesting fellow I wondered what he did during the war went the wiki and his fucking page is blanked just listing medals like what the fuck is this bitches problem no biographical details nothing he was hewn from the essence of creation by hitler himself and told to kill russians is all i could gather.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: TheMagician
JJLiautaud said:
So i was playing some HOI4 this weekend as germany and i saw the General who ill always refer to as bandage head Ernst Hell thought heres an interesting fellow I wondered what he did during the war went the wiki and his fucking page is blanked just listing medals like what the fuck is this bitches problem no biographical details nothing he was hewn from the essence of creation by hitler himself and told to kill russians is all i could gather.
Click to expand...

She also removed the citation wording from his Knight's Cross that existed on the (rather short) article before 2015; the citation is going to be the same thing whether she wants it to be or not, if we quote Victoria Cross and Medal of Honor citations Knight's Crosses should be as well.

Again, just some clueless cunt who doesn't know shit about the military, but since the mere presence of NAZI removes brain cells you can describe nothing neutrally. She also made sure to add that the USSR held him as a 'war criminal' until 1955 (I happened to know a German paratrooper who immigrated to the US who was held until 1955 too) - never mind they held tons of random soldiers until the same year, and releasing them was a condition the German government had for eventually joining NATO.

Wikipedia actually has a rule for exactly what she is doing, it's' called WP:IDONTLIKEIT. She doesn't believe that German soliders didn't feast on Jews daily, and that maybe other things happened in their lives worth describing.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Lunacy
Reactions: From The Uncanny Valley, UnsufficentBoobage, murgatroid and 12 others
BootlegPopeye said:
She also removed the citation wording from his Knight's Cross that existed on the (rather short) article before 2015; the citation is going to be the same thing whether she wants it to be or not, if we quote Victoria Cross and Medal of Honor citations Knight's Crosses should be as well.

Again, just some clueless cunt who doesn't know shit about the military, but since the mere presence of NAZI removes brain cells you can describe nothing neutrally. She also made sure to add that the USSR held him as a 'war criminal' until 1955 (I happened to know a German paratrooper who immigrated to the US who was held until 1955 too) - never mind they held tons of random soldiers until the same year, and releasing them was a condition the German government had for eventually joining NATO.
Click to expand...
Ah so the article was always bare bones I see. Dude probably had a pretty interesting life tough being in WW1 and WW2 and still lived to be almost 90 i need to brush up my german or see if theres a Who Whos eastern front edition.
 
JJLiautaud said:
Ah so the article was always bare bones I see. Dude probably had a pretty interesting life tough being in WW1 and WW2 and still lived to be almost 90 i need to brush up my german or see if theres a Who Whos eastern front edition.
Click to expand...

Well, yes, but like I said it did get the 'coffmann touch'. She removed the Knight's Cross citation. She probably removed tons of these, but since they have a NAZI source they can't be quoted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JJLiautaud
BootlegPopeye said:
That book has misinformed 20+ years worth of students unfortunate enough to have a prof dumb enough to present it as anything more than a long political tract. Basically, everyone the US opposed was ackshoolee the good guys, but aw shucks, they always lose. Really it is just plain anti-American, there is a point you cross when it's just obvious you despise your own country.

And yes, absolutely Zinn was a commie. After he died, the FBI put out his file:

Zinn's File

It's hundreds of pages. When it first came out, I read the whole thing (the old school FBI files make for interesting reading, from what they release, most of these people had good reason to be looked at). Here he is in 1949 (so way earlier than some others) protesting in favor of some commie sponsored Jewish thing:


View attachment 2679606
Click to expand...
I do love it when you have those people who claim to not hate their country and than try to paint a clear commie and anti American propaganda book in a positive light.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: From The Uncanny Valley
Flaming Insignias said:
Someone loves their Zinn. Not a single point of criticism or reference to Zinn being an actual fucking commie.
Click to expand...
I'm sure Wikipedians think Marxist infiltration of Western institutions is a conspiracy theory as well.
BootlegPopeye said:
That book has misinformed 20+ years worth of students unfortunate enough to have a prof dumb enough to present it as anything more than a long political tract. Basically, everyone the US opposed was ackshoolee the good guys, but aw shucks, they always lose. Really it is just plain anti-American, there is a point you cross when it's just obvious you despise your own country.

And yes, absolutely Zinn was a commie. After he died, the FBI put out his file:

Zinn's File

It's hundreds of pages. When it first came out, I read the whole thing (the old school FBI files make for interesting reading, from what they release, most of these people had good reason to be looked at). Here he is in 1949 (so way earlier than some others) protesting in favor of some commie sponsored Jewish thing:


View attachment 2679606
Click to expand...
Off topic but do you know of any channels that read old FBI files?
JJLiautaud said:
So i was playing some HOI4 this weekend as germany and i saw the General who ill always refer to as bandage head Ernst Hell thought heres an interesting fellow I wondered what he did during the war went the wiki and his fucking page is blanked just listing medals like what the fuck is this bitches problem no biographical details nothing he was hewn from the essence of creation by hitler himself and told to kill russians is all i could gather.
Click to expand...
Because insane commie Stalin apologie Coffman found the article and ree'd about Natzees as usual. It's a damn shame because most German generals have really interesting histories regardless of politics. A lot were never even particulalry enthused by Hitler, but as careerist officers they stuck by the party as fellow travellers. Most had decades of service goin back to even before WW1.

But of course we can't learn about that or put it on their bios, because Natzees reeeeeee! Whhatever happened to salute the rank, not the man?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: From The Uncanny Valley, Josterman, Da Capo and 2 others
A more mundane find than many of the examples posted ITT so far, but the article for Pedro Lopez cracked me up because of the dire warning displayed prominently at the top of the article:

brave_p6FpmvWqVp.png

This motherfucker was literally convicted of 110 murders (and he confessed to a total of 350), and these faggots are primarily concerned with not libeling him. The talk page is similarly hilarious, where there's some discussion as to whether he's even a real person or not, whether he's dead or not, or which year is most appropriate for the sentence "as of 20xx, his whereabouts are unknown" because -- as one brilliant wikipedoan argues -- "we cannot just say that they do not know where he was in 2018 or 2019 without finding sources from that year that say they do not know where he is."
 
  • Lunacy
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Pope Julius IV, Radola Gajda, TheMagician and 13 others
moocow said:
A more mundane find than many of the examples posted ITT so far, but the article for Pedro Lopez cracked me up because of the dire warning displayed prominently at the top of the article:

View attachment 2689294

This motherfucker was literally convicted of 110 murders (and he confessed to a total of 350), and these faggots are primarily concerned with not libeling him. The talk page is similarly hilarious, where there's some discussion as to whether he's even a real person or not, whether he's dead or not, or which year is most appropriate for the sentence "as of 20xx, his whereabouts are unknown" because -- as one brilliant wikipedoan argues -- "we cannot just say that they do not know where he was in 2018 or 2019 without finding sources from that year that say they do not know where he is."
Click to expand...
Dark Royce lopez
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back