Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

[lolcow yoghurt]

Archive it

Tranny shark toy article archived

Blåhaj - Wikipedia

archived 23 Mar 2023 16:35:41 UTC

archive.md

 

[scathefire]

Tranny shark toy article

Blåhaj - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

This reminded me how they claim literally anything with blue, pink and white on it as theirs. In this case though it's a major reach, literally no sane person would look at a dark blue shark plushie and think "this reminds me of how I want to cut my penis off."

 

[General Emílio Médici]

This reminded me how they claim literally anything with blue, pink and white on it as theirs.

Oh God oh fuck they are gonna take over a entire Brazilian state as tranny country aw hell naw

Let's hope the slogan keeps them away

 

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

Sam Hyde, well a fan of his, is supposedly in a dispute with Wikipedia over his MENSA membership.

 

[Dan Schneider]

Some autists on the Brianna Wu article just debated if the BLP policy should be applied to grammar fixes, demanding "consensus" first before those changes get added to the article. I kid you not, there was an essay-length discussion on whether it was appropriate.

Archives:

Talk:Brianna Wu - Wikipedia

archived 23 Mar 2023 22:22:28 UTC

archive.md

Page history - Wikipedia

archived 23 Mar 2023 22:50:20 UTC

archive.md

https://archive.md/NtIpC

 

[Moral Decay]

Some autists on the Brianna Wu article just debated if the BLP policy should be applied to grammar fixes, demanding "consensus" first before those changes get added to the article. I kid you not, there was an essay-length discussion on whether it was appropriate.

Archives:

Talk:Brianna Wu - Wikipedia

archived 23 Mar 2023 22:22:28 UTC

archive.md

Page history - Wikipedia

archived 23 Mar 2023 22:50:20 UTC

archive.md

https://archive.md/NtIpC

View attachment 4862029View attachment 4862036
View attachment 4862048View attachment 4862049

I had a sliver of hope for a second seeing all the "bystanders" gawking at how insane this was.

Then I saw where the punctuation guy got indefinitely banned just like the retard who reverted the edits. Fucking Wikipedia.

 

[Lucille Bluth]

Sports fans on Wikipedia are quite autistic. Aaron Rodgers page had to be blue locked because of the disruptive editing.

I can't believe I never realized that any sport, be it football (American), basketball, baseball, and so on, you will find many handful of "expert" users who watch every sports related page like a hawk. Waiting for some clueless user to fuck up and revert all their edits. Basketball articles are usually watched by this user, who totally has a life outside of editing Wikipedia.

Also, Wikipedia's list on all the Asian Academy Award winners and nominees is surprisingly non-discriminant in including all people from Asia or of Asian ancestry beyond the Chinks. It really shows that any media propaganda of Michelle Yeoh's "historic" win as the first and only "Asian" actress to win an award is a load of bullshit that requires extreme goalpost moving. It looks like she would be the fifth "Asian" actress to win Best Actress to win and like the 8th one nominated.

I think this list has been far more influential than I thought, because I saw media articles acknowledging that Vivien Leigh and Natalie Portman are technically Asian women, but change the goal post to state that Michelle Yeoh is "undoubtedly Asian", is not "full Asian descent" and by American standards, is considered "Asian", because the Anglo-Indian Vivien Leigh was too round eyed to ever be seen as "Asian" by Americans.

 

[AnOminous]

Then I saw where the punctuation guy got indefinitely banned just like the retard who reverted the edits. Fucking Wikipedia.

What a pathetic fake encyclopedia.

Some autists on the Brianna Wu article just debated if the BLP policy should be applied to grammar fixes, demanding "consensus" first before those changes get added to the article. I kid you not, there was an essay-length discussion on whether it was appropriate.

So literally a punctuation war and these fucking retards went absolutely ballistic.

Meanwhile John Walker Flynt is a man who cut his own dick off and married a chink.

 

[Flexo]

I think this list has been far more influential than I thought, because I saw media articles acknowledging that Vivien Leigh and Natalie Portman are technically Asian women, but change the goal post to state that Michelle Yeoh is "undoubtedly Asian", is not "full Asian descent" and by American standards, is considered "Asian", because the Anglo-Indian Vivien Leigh was too round eyed to ever be seen as "Asian" by Americans.

It's still hilarious to me that they want to call Michelle Yeoh the first "oriental" winner, but can't because "oriental" is now a bad word.

 

[Corpun]

Vladimir the Great - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Another victim of Wikipedia's Ukraine fetish

Vladimir I Sviatoslavich or Volodymyr I Sviatoslavych[6] (Old East Slavic: Володимѣръ Свѧтославичь, Volodiměrъ Svętoslavičь;[a]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_the_Great#cite_note-9 c. 958 – 15 July 1015), nicknamed the Great,[8] was Prince of Novgorod, Grand Prince of Kiev, and ruler of Kievan Rus' from 980 to 1015.

 

[Sayer of the N-Word]

At least "Vladimir" comes first.

 

[TitusOvid]

How long is this misgendering of a tranny going to stand?

 

[Corpun]

At least "Vladimir" comes first.

Looking at the edit history there seems to be an edit war over the past few days which should come first. The edit seems to originally came from an unresgistered account justifying it with he was born in what is now Ukraine. That's so fucking dumb for an excuse.

I mean we don't Italianize Roman names, we don't Hispanize the names of Incan emperors. What's so special about this Slav? Oh yeah, Ukroshilling. It's been a debate that's over a decade old but the change seems recent.

 

[lolcow yoghurt]

Vladimir the Great - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Another victim of Wikipedia's Ukraine fetish

Vladimir I Sviatoslavich or Volodymyr I Sviatoslavych[6] (Old East Slavic: Володимѣръ Свѧтославичь, Volodiměrъ Svętoslavičь;[a]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_the_Great#cite_note-9 c. 958 – 15 July 1015), nicknamed the Great,[8] was Prince of Novgorod, Grand Prince of Kiev, and ruler of Kievan Rus' from 980 to 1015.

I think they should just say "Volodimer Sviatoslavich" ahead.

 

[Fathomless Eminence]

There's a discussion now on the Trumpism talk page:View attachment 4683516


Well, that paragraph says it's uncertain how to classify Trumpism, which (I hope) weighs against making definitive claims such as putting it in a Fascism infobox.

Long story short I was on a wiki-walk, saw that trumpism page, thought it was hilarious and saw that Di guy too.

He's written some pretty cringe articles and is a confirmed anime/D&D fella as they usually are.

Here's a rejected fanboy article he wrote on some breadtuber I didn't really dig into this one but I saw it links to BreadTube and had a chuckle because it just fits so well with the aura of soy he emanates.

This might be his YouTube, it has the name from his wikipedia page, a Public Domain movies playlist (He listed he likes Public Domain in his Wikipedia profile) and a guy in his YouTube comments who has a few accounts related to the shared interest of heraldry sperging.

This could be his twitter, I have no way to verify that other than searching Di Amador and seeing a hispanic fella being really really fucking gay about Anne Hathaway - https://twitter.com/astronautamex I archived it just in case but there's really nothing on there and I don't expect anything to come of it, he's just kind of the standard weirdo lefty. https://archive.is/f3acc

 

[Something Awful]

For the record, currently, the Jan 6 article is about 17,500 words. The article on World War 2, a 6 year conflict across the globe and the bloodiest human conflict in living memory is 3,000 words LESS.

lol wut? That's a very disingenious comparison. There are over 9000 articles about World War II, taking the word count of the main article and trying to use that to prove some kind of point is ridiculous.

 

[870EVO]

I was recently researching Nazi stuff, just for shits and giggles. Never really decided to get into that stuff until now. I was reading the article on the Holocaust.

There is one line devoted to Typhus in the article.

The British 11th Armoured Division found around 60,000 prisoners (90 percent Jews) when they liberated Bergen-Belsen,[411][416] as well as 13,000 unburied corpses; another 10,000 people died from typhus or malnutrition over the following weeks.[417]

The Holocaust - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

I had looked up the article on Typhus, since someone had mentioned some Nazis had died in the camps from it, and discovered it was much more prevalent than stated in the Holocaust article.

During World War II, many German POWs after the loss at Stalingrad died of typhus. Typhus epidemics killed those confined to POW camps, ghettos, and Nazi concentration camps who were held in unhygienic conditions. Pictures of mass graves including people who died from typhus can be seen in footage shot at Bergen-Belsen concentration camp.[40] Among thousands of prisoners in concentration camps such as Theresienstadt and Bergen-Belsen who died of typhus[40] were Anne Frank, age 15, and her sister Margot, age 19 in the latter camp.

Typhus - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

I thought it interesting the Holocaust largely overshadows what appears to be a Typhus epidemic during the second World War. The problem is, it's far too a touchy subject to ever get resolved. Everyone seems to have their own personal opinion.

 

[General Emílio Médici]

The "idea" of the Holocaust is far more important than any facts. There is, simply put, a sect of Jews who have made the Holocaust into their religion. And of course zionists and bolsheviks both love to use it as a quick blunt trauma solution to get their way on arguments.

The point about typhus epidemic is one of the issues that comes from this. A honest discussion of it isn't allowed because it is seen as being adjacent to "holocaust denial" even if you don't mention it at all. The mere idea of addressing it is enough to cause endless kvetching. And so it gets ignored.

Ironically this does more to keep holocaust denial going, as it makes for a convenient way to show how "(((they))) are lying about it" for people talking about it. But it's a calculated maneuver to make sure the topic is always taboo and always sensitive to be used as a weapon. Similar to how no one counters the argument about "wow 6 million cookies baked in years? but the ovens couldn't have worked so long and so often and where did the fuel come from? :^)" with the obvious "not all 6 million jews killed were cremated dumbass" and end it. No they have to go into a long, wordy and verbose condemnation of antisemitism and talk about how disappointing it is and emotionally blackmail people into feeling bad for even considering hearing it. Because the memory needs to be kept fresh and painful for the grift to work.

 

[Skeletonized Cow]

Especially since these types claim to hate lobbying when it's done by groups like the NRA or similar 'right wing' groups. Bringing up people like Soros buying out DA appointees to spending billions during campaigns and all the other rich elite assholes doing shit like that isn't kosher when it is the 'good guys'

They won't ever question it because fact-checkers declared such a question anti-Semitic.

The "idea" of the Holocaust is far more important than any facts. There is, simply put, a sect of Jews who have made the Holocaust into their religion. And of course zionists and bolsheviks both love to use it as a quick blunt trauma solution to get their way on arguments.

The point about typhus epidemic is one of the issues that comes from this. A honest discussion of it isn't allowed because it is seen as being adjacent to "holocaust denial" even if you don't mention it at all. The mere idea of addressing it is enough to cause endless kvetching. And so it gets ignored.

Ironically this does more to keep holocaust denial going, as it makes for a convenient way to show how "(((they))) are lying about it" for people talking about it. But it's a calculated maneuver to make sure the topic is always taboo and always sensitive to be used as a weapon. Similar to how no one counters the argument about "wow 6 million cookies baked in years? but the ovens couldn't have worked so long and so often and where did the fuel come from? :^)" with the obvious "not all 6 million jews killed were cremated dumbass" and end it. No they have to go into a long, wordy and verbose condemnation of antisemitism and talk about how disappointing it is and emotionally blackmail people into feeling bad for even considering hearing it. Because the memory needs to be kept fresh and painful for the grift to work.

Fundamentally, the inability to discuss the Holocaust in an objective manner or place it in it's context will prove a far larger thorn in the side of Jews than I suspect they think. Because the people who kvetch about the Holocaust are correct on one matter: it did not spring out from nothing.

The inability to truthfully discuss how things went from discrimination, to ghettoization, to internment, to slave-labor, to extermination prevents a meaningful understanding of how to prevent such a thing in the future.

Furthermore, most Holocaust rhetoric is genuinely marginalizing to other victims of National Socialist terror before and during WW2. This further decreases trust by most outsiders, and considering that within a few years *everyone* will be an outsider to some degree very shortly when the last survivor finally dies, that might not be a good thing to let happen.

 

[Corpun]

Death mask - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

All well and good except for this random paragraph.

In Russia, the death mask tradition dates back to the times of Peter the Great, whose death mask was taken by Carlo Bartolomeo Rastrelli. Also well known are the death masks of Nicholas I, and Alexander I. Stalin's death mask is on display at the Stalin Museum in Gori, Georgia.

One of the first real Ukrainian death masks was that of the poet Taras Shevchenko, taken by Peter Clodt von Jürgensburg in St. Petersburg, Russia.[5]

In early spring of 1860 and shortly before his death in April 1865, two life masks were created of President Abraham Lincoln.[6]

I can see referencing Russian and Lincoln's death masks, but why some Ukrainian poet no westerner will ever care about? How Ukrainian can putting a mold on a dead person's face be that prior death masks weren't real Ukrainian?