Wait wait wait. -That- scene got backlash? There was nothing transphobic about it as despite revealing the character's true gender .It was supplimental to the story and it handled it with a certain tact... Except maybe towards the end.
Yeah. That's kind of the point I was making in my post .if critics had actually watched the movie (As most reviewers will take second hand word or written word, at least these days) then opinionate on this one awkward scene that looks so glaring and out of place and "Much political feelings!"
well i'd be disturbed as well if i found out i was fucked by a trap
The argument is that when male characters are a wish fulfillment device for a male author it's called A Protagonist, not a Mary sue.
I swear, on a long enough timeline, everything will be considered offensive. Drinking water will be culturally appropriating fish.
"Sadly, the pants cannot cure cancer." I was looking up random shit out of boredom, and stumbled onto the article for The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants. I got to that sentence and it struck me as so ridiculous and bizarre that I laughed out loud for a good ten minutes.
This was posted a while back, so I WAS gonna rate it “late,” but I genuinely thought they deleted this article ages ago because it was too shit even for them. I could’ve sworn it was at least nominated for deletion, but I’m too lazy to check. I wonder what the case was for keeping it?
