Dwarf Fortress adds trans dwarves - basement dwellers who are confused about their sexuality are outraged.

If they're doing this as a way to just make the gameplay crazier than it currently is, then fine, I don't think people will have too much trouble with that outside of initial pushback. I'm fairly certain tranny dwarves wouldn't be the weirdest thing you can do in Dwarf Fortress.

If they're attempting to push some crappy woke agenda into the game, then it's just an omen of worse things to come. Everyone knows the "feminist" advocates will not stop just at that, they will keep adding more. If that's the case, the message to the developers should be this:

I agree with you, but let's be honest we all know it's the second one and they won't stop now that they've started.

If you're unable to enjoy a game because there are trans characters in it, maybe you're the one with the problem

Then again if you're unable to enjoy a game because there aren't trans characters in it you might also have a problem

Everyone needs to lol calm down imo

"If you're unable to enjoy a game because there is political agenda pushing in it, maybe you're the one with the problem."

"Then again if you're unable to enjoy a game because there isn't political agenda pushing in it, maybe you're the one with the problem."

One of these is sane, and the other bullshit.
 
Play Rimworld instead.

Build an empire on harvesting prisoner organs and manufacturing yayo.

Then lose your entire colony because the master of your bear army gets one-shotted and causes a mass animal murderous rage moodlet.
I already did. I built a large, walled pot- and beerfarm with several amenities and junkies armed with sniper rifles and bionic limbs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PantsFreeZone
I mean these are the same people that made Liberal Crime Squad. Sure LCS might be a parody game, but it doesn't surprise me they added this to DF.

What DOES surprise me is that they are still working on it.
 
"If you're unable to enjoy a game because there is political agenda pushing in it, maybe you're the one with the problem."

"Then again if you're unable to enjoy a game because there isn't political agenda pushing in it, maybe you're the one with the problem."

One of these is sane, and the other bullshit.
I guess it depends on if you consider the mere existence of trans characters to be agenda-pushing or not, then
 
This. This so fucking much.

The quality and substance of a game and not the wokeness is all that counts.
It really says something about these people that they don't buy a game to enjoy it themselves, they buy it to get mad at other people who don't enjoy it the correct way.
 
LCS predates Trump being anywhere near close to being elected President. Either way, love that game.
That's what makes it so great tbh, they could see in the future and correctly create a game that was absurd in it's time and would get awards at Waypoint, Resetera, Polygon if they would release it today.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Unog
I guess it depends on if you consider the mere existence of trans characters to be agenda-pushing or not, then

Article said:
The Twitter user who requested the trans dwarves replied on behalf of Bay 12 Games, stating that it was about gender identity and expression rather than serving any sort of meaningful, functional purpose.

I'm not stepping on that rake, buddy. It's agenda pushing plain and simple.
 
...Of all games DF has the perfect cover to do this without controversy...
I think these kinds of games with minimalistic graphics that provide for intentional and unintentional hilarity, i.e. Dwarf Fortress, Space Station 13, Cataclysm: Dark Days Ahead, etc. are the best games to have this kind of thing in without any kind of pushback from players (or at least some initial pushback, because at this point people are conditioned to be on their toes when transgender-related things are concerned). It's not the fact that they're adding it that makes it bad, but the suspicion in people's minds (or a very clear statement) that an unnecessary agenda is being pushed onto them in a game where you can rip people's testicles off and beat their previous owner to death with them.
 
yeah but in the function of the game it'll probably be irrelevant. Doesn't bother me any more than some dev saying "hey, animate a 3rd of the townspeople as black"

So I'm supposed to be passive or even appreciative of a dev effectively confirming that they have an agenda, and will be using their game as a method of proselytizing it?

Nah, I think I'll be sane and do as another user upthread said, and instead just get Rimworld. Damn shame, I really like DF too.
 
So I'm supposed to be passive or even appreciative of a dev effectively confirming that they have an agenda, and will be using their game as a method of proselytizing it?

Nah, I think I'll be sane and do as another user upthread said, and instead just get Rimworld.
The problem is, once the question is asked either answer is technically an agenda. Would saying "we refuse to include trans characters" not also be an agenda?
 
Sounds like a bug, but because it's a feature that involves supposedly complex pronouns I'm looking forward to the bugs that comes out of it.
 
If you're unable to enjoy a game because there are trans characters in it, maybe you're the one with the problem

Then again if you're unable to enjoy a game because there aren't trans characters in it you might also have a problem

Everyone needs to lol calm down imo
It's not about any particular issue, it's about control. If trans become ubiquitous in everything, then they'll find a new problem.
Where you draw the line is irrelevant--the question is "do you want to stand up and control your own art, or be told what to make by people who will always find fault with you and your art, forever?"
 
The problem is, once the question is asked either answer is technically an agenda. Would saying "we refuse to include trans characters" not also be an agenda?

You know what they could've done instead?

Ignored it.

But they didn't. I find it interesting that you're invested in pushing the idea that it's not proselytizing.
 
You know what they could've done instead?

Ignored it.

But they didn't. I find it interesting that you're invested in pushing the idea that it's not proselytizing.
C'mon, man, "trans people exist" is barely one step up from "black people exist" in "proselytizing". If you wanna turn every little thing into some culture war battle that's fine, I'd rather just sit back and enjoy things.
 
Back