- Joined
- Feb 25, 2013
What's the problem?
Cannon fodder has its uses...
Cannon fodder has its uses...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If they're doing this as a way to just make the gameplay crazier than it currently is, then fine, I don't think people will have too much trouble with that outside of initial pushback. I'm fairly certain tranny dwarves wouldn't be the weirdest thing you can do in Dwarf Fortress.
If they're attempting to push some crappy woke agenda into the game, then it's just an omen of worse things to come. Everyone knows the "feminist" advocates will not stop just at that, they will keep adding more. If that's the case, the message to the developers should be this:
If you're unable to enjoy a game because there are trans characters in it, maybe you're the one with the problem
Then again if you're unable to enjoy a game because there aren't trans characters in it you might also have a problem
Everyone needs to lol calm down imo
I already did. I built a large, walled pot- and beerfarm with several amenities and junkies armed with sniper rifles and bionic limbs.Play Rimworld instead.
Build an empire on harvesting prisoner organs and manufacturing yayo.
Then lose your entire colony because the master of your bear army gets one-shotted and causes a mass animal murderous rage moodlet.
Worst part is that no-one knows about that satire game the DF devs made about resisting Trump
I guess it depends on if you consider the mere existence of trans characters to be agenda-pushing or not, then"If you're unable to enjoy a game because there is political agenda pushing in it, maybe you're the one with the problem."
"Then again if you're unable to enjoy a game because there isn't political agenda pushing in it, maybe you're the one with the problem."
One of these is sane, and the other bullshit.
It really says something about these people that they don't buy a game to enjoy it themselves, they buy it to get mad at other people who don't enjoy it the correct way.This. This so fucking much.
The quality and substance of a game and not the wokeness is all that counts.
That's what makes it so great tbh, they could see in the future and correctly create a game that was absurd in it's time and would get awards at Waypoint, Resetera, Polygon if they would release it today.LCS predates Trump being anywhere near close to being elected President. Either way, love that game.
I guess it depends on if you consider the mere existence of trans characters to be agenda-pushing or not, then
Article said:The Twitter user who requested the trans dwarves replied on behalf of Bay 12 Games, stating that it was about gender identity and expression rather than serving any sort of meaningful, functional purpose.
I think these kinds of games with minimalistic graphics that provide for intentional and unintentional hilarity, i.e. Dwarf Fortress, Space Station 13, Cataclysm: Dark Days Ahead, etc. are the best games to have this kind of thing in without any kind of pushback from players (or at least some initial pushback, because at this point people are conditioned to be on their toes when transgender-related things are concerned). It's not the fact that they're adding it that makes it bad, but the suspicion in people's minds (or a very clear statement) that an unnecessary agenda is being pushed onto them in a game where you can rip people's testicles off and beat their previous owner to death with them....Of all games DF has the perfect cover to do this without controversy...
yeah but in the function of the game it'll probably be irrelevant. Doesn't bother me any more than some dev saying "hey, animate a 3rd of the townspeople as black"I'm not stepping on that rake, buddy. It's agenda pushing plain and simple.
yeah but in the function of the game it'll probably be irrelevant. Doesn't bother me any more than some dev saying "hey, animate a 3rd of the townspeople as black"
The problem is, once the question is asked either answer is technically an agenda. Would saying "we refuse to include trans characters" not also be an agenda?So I'm supposed to be passive or even appreciative of a dev effectively confirming that they have an agenda, and will be using their game as a method of proselytizing it?
Nah, I think I'll be sane and do as another user upthread said, and instead just get Rimworld.
It's not about any particular issue, it's about control. If trans become ubiquitous in everything, then they'll find a new problem.If you're unable to enjoy a game because there are trans characters in it, maybe you're the one with the problem
Then again if you're unable to enjoy a game because there aren't trans characters in it you might also have a problem
Everyone needs to lol calm down imo
The problem is, once the question is asked either answer is technically an agenda. Would saying "we refuse to include trans characters" not also be an agenda?
C'mon, man, "trans people exist" is barely one step up from "black people exist" in "proselytizing". If you wanna turn every little thing into some culture war battle that's fine, I'd rather just sit back and enjoy things.You know what they could've done instead?
Ignored it.
But they didn't. I find it interesting that you're invested in pushing the idea that it's not proselytizing.