- Joined
- Aug 21, 2024
i think I might know why there were less chimpouts. Some states chose to finance snap using thier own money.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No one ever is topping Jeet Nigger Justin Trudeau
I've found it works out better to steam it.Isn't cooking lobster just putting it in boiling water?
The original statement was something along the lines that "human rights do not exist if they require the labor of others". I partially disagreed with that statement because the legal system involves the labor of others and right pertaining to children involved the labor of others. The next poster irrelevantly sperged out about children being economic resources in the past. Now there seems to be a Captain Obvious derail about the concept of human rights evolving over time. It doesn't change the fact that at least some modern rights do involve the labor of others.European common law has existed for almost a millennia now. "No freeman shall be taken or imprisoned... or in any other way destroyed... but by the lawful judgement of his peers", that ring a bell? Not all of Europe was quick on the uptake of common law (and the kingdoms that did have it on the statutes didn't always adhere to it 100%), but the concept has been around for a very, very long time. As for horse & cattle rustlers, justice was the way it was back in those times for a reason. life was hard in the frontier and everyone needed to cooperate to survive. Banditry could have and would have caused untold damage if not kept in check, so anyone caught was made an example of to deter other would-be outlaws. hell, the entire concept of being outlawed was a deterrence. it's in the name itself, they were outside of the law, so anyone could do anything to them without consequence. An outlaw sought to live by depriving the rights and livelihood of others, so all rights were deprived from him.
It's a testament to how successful the systems of ordered liberty white men created have been to have so much civilizational inertia as to be able to support this huge number of parasitic luxury ideals that no one will be able or willing to defend after the fall.Obvious derail about the concept of human rights evolving over time. It doesn't change the fact that at least some modern rights do involve the labor of others.
IIRC, the estimates I was told were put forward show that the states able to do this will not be able to fund this past maybe a month and the selection on who gets paid out will be stringent.i think I might know why there were less chimpouts. Some states chose to finance snap using thier own money.
But I thought republicans don't support big government and welfare systems?You've clipped the important top part of that off. I was pleasantly surprised to see that the full version makes clear that the Democrats have actively voted against funding SNAP.
View attachment 8112687
I think this from
is also something that needs to go around to show exactly what the Dems are demanding (shared by @Bland Crumbs earlier):
View attachment 8112692
There's a lot of political value in making clear to people that Democrats wont approve SNAP funding unless they get extra traffic rights for driving an electric car.
It’s actually far more likely to be Hispanics and illegals than black. There’s like over 15% of Hispanics and less than 1.5% in all of Utah. There’s more violent parts of Utah like Ogden have much higher percentage of Hispanics lmfao. 26% in Ogden and that’s supposed to be a legit shithole shock shock.Are there even enough blacks in Utah for that?
And if a legal system cannot be provided, the accused has to be let go. Society as a whole is attempting to infringe upon that person's liberty, so society has to pony up for it.the legal system involves the labor of others
Human rights, are a western concept, and the reason why the left screeches about them while screeching about de-colonization, is because cabals of rich people are trying to take away our rights so that they can become richer and more powerful. Behind the marxists are billionaires, because those billionaires realized that the best way to screw over poor people is with marxists.There are no such thing as human rights at all. There are no universally agreed rights that every country shares.
We have the laws of man and civilized polite society. That's all we're hanging onto as a collective, the gentlemen's agreement of "I won't do it to you if you don't do it to me" pact.
I'm so sick of people acting like every little thing is their god given right. God didn't give us shit as humans except the gift of life. The rest of it is up to us to figure out.
I love how every person in that article looks fat and is likely diabetic.
Everyone gets healthcare. What you mean is that you think it’s a universal right for someone else to pay the bill for the goods and services. If we accept that standard then nothing can ever be charged for because it would obviously be less important.i dunno man i think healthcare is a human right
They're still pumping them full of growth hormones. Apparently 92% of US beef is raised with hormones.I know this is supposed to be a joke, but "they" were actively feeding cows parts of other cows and sheep for protein, and only stopped because of mad cow outbreaks.
Just a few more steps to Outer Heaven....If and when trump pulls this off, then suddenly the dems have quite literally nothing to stand on. This would not only be a rug pull bigger than all of crypto combined but in political history it would knee cap them for a long time.