Facebook post, 27 September: Megan.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
:roll: It's just like Chandler to blame somebody else for a mess he himself created.

Too bad Megan can't sue him.
 
This post really highlights Chris' disgusting Nice Guy attitude. "I had been nothing but Good, Nice, and Loyal to her; she should have repaid me with Good and Pleasant Hanky-Panky, like girls do for their Guy Pals in the Romantic Comedy Movies we watched together; IT WAS BASICALLY PROMISED!"

You were nothing like Good, Nice and Loyal to her, Chris, you fuckwitted loveshy. Anyone willing to give you the time of day is a better friend than you deserve.
 
CKO87 said:
Too bad Megan can't sue him.
Click to expand...

I think it's more like she just doesn't want to. I think she may actually pity him because of his self destructive lifestyle. Plus, it would just give her unwanted attention anyway and she wants no part in it.
 
Shadow Fox said:
This post really highlights Chris' disgusting Nice Guy attitude. "I had been nothing but Good, Nice, and Loyal to her; she should have repaid me with Good and Pleasant Hanky-Panky, like girls do for their Guy Pals in the Romantic Comedy Movies we watched together; IT WAS BASICALLY PROMISED!"

You were nothing like Good, Nice and Loyal to her, Chris, you fuckwitted loveshy. Anyone willing to give you the time of day is a better friend than you deserve.
Click to expand...
Marvin and I were discussing this the other day. I pointed out that Chris is basically a naturally-evolving loveshy: he didn't learn any of the lingo or get his ideas by being exposed to the community of already established loveshys, but he fits their victim-complex dogma to a T. He just came to it by being so self-centered and full of resentment.
 
Alec Benson Leary said:
Shadow Fox said:
This post really highlights Chris' disgusting Nice Guy attitude. "I had been nothing but Good, Nice, and Loyal to her; she should have repaid me with Good and Pleasant Hanky-Panky, like girls do for their Guy Pals in the Romantic Comedy Movies we watched together; IT WAS BASICALLY PROMISED!"

You were nothing like Good, Nice and Loyal to her, Chris, you fuckwitted loveshy. Anyone willing to give you the time of day is a better friend than you deserve.
Click to expand...
Marvin and I were discussing this the other day. I pointed out that Chris is basically a naturally-evolving loveshy: he didn't learn any of the lingo or get his ideas by being exposed to the community of already established loveshys, but he fits their victim-complex dogma to a T. He just came to it by being so self-centered and full of resentment.
Click to expand...
To a T?, don't you mean to an M and S?
 
This is why Chris is naive on getting girls.

scS.jpg
 
The Dude said:
You know, the way that Chris has treated/still treats Megan is one of the things I dislike most about Christian. I hesitate to use the word "hate" because there are few people I genuinely hate, but I "hate" that Chris acts like this about one of the precious few real friends Chris has ever had. It's disgusting.
Click to expand...
This shit with Megan is particularly infuriating because it's literally insult on top of injury. Chris treated her like shit, humiliated her, repeatedly violated her personal space, and made her uncomfortable to go to one of the only places in town where she actually felt comfortable with people and had a fun time. Now he's publicly calling her a bitch and a terrible person years after the fact. That is her repayment for being one of the only people in his entire life who was kind enough to look past his ridiculously off-putting appearance/behavior and genuinely befriend him. For whatever faults Megan may have, Chris didn't deserve for her to ever so much as look in his general direction.
 
I wonder what would have happened if Chris did win that Parappa contest. The audience knew Megan wasn't gonna go on the trip with him, how would that have progressed?
 
Chris would have had fun with Barb, taking her to a really extravagent [sic] destination (he is not rich), taking a long-wanted tour of the Nintendo of America company tour, with her, playing Guitar Hero against the guy in the PaRappa costume, jamming with Barb in the hotel room and possibly their first time in the bed... *sigh*
 
A-№1 said:
Alec Benson Leary said:
One can argue that such a strong degree of self interest is malevolent. He believes so strongly that it's okay to destroy other people's lives to protect his own ego, he never even thinks it over when he does it.
Click to expand...
Never mind protecting his own ego; Chris would readily destroy other people's lives for a ham sandwich.

But is it truly malevolence, or just incredible callousness? Chris has absolutely no empathy. Other people aren't real to him, and don't matter to him, but he can already taste that delicious ham sandwich. Admittedly the end result is almost identical to malevolence.

I mean I can't really see Chris kicking a puppy just to make it suffer, but at the same time I can see him driving over that same puppy without a second thought if it prevents him from anything he thinks he deserves.
Click to expand...

Along these lines...dude needlessly ran over a snake on purpose. If that's not malevolent I don't know what is.

Henry Bemis said:
The Dude said:
Alec Benson Leary said:
^More like I'm saying his fear of letting go of power has led him to the dark side.
Click to expand...

So what your saying is Chris is an IRL Darth Vader. :alog:
Click to expand...

Just swap James Earl Jones's ominous, threatening voice and David Prowse's stature for...Chris.
Click to expand...

Or just cast Jones as the Darth Vader body and David Prowse as the voice :lol: .

The Dude said:
CatParty said:
more like bent helmet.
Click to expand...

Duck 'Bator.
Click to expand...

That should be Chris' porn name (in HOMO porn of course :julay: )
 
Holdek, it's a fucking snake. How many normal people do you know would give a shit in practice?
 
Mr. 0 said:
Holdek, it's a fucking snake. How many normal people do you know would give a shit in practice?
Click to expand...
Depends if its cute or dangerous
 
Everyone, please, your boobage, let it be peaceful. You don't have to think that a pet snake is literally equivalent to a person in cognition and emotion, etc. to recognize that deliberately running over a snake that he was safe from -- being in his car and all -- is just kind of a dick move. It's like the kid on the block who squashes ants for fun. It's not that the ants are people. It's that, at least in the neighborhood I grew up in, they weren't ants that inflicted horrible bites or invaded your home; they were just hanging out being harmless, and they were neither tasty nor a trophy you could proudly display on your wall. Ergo, dick move. If Chris intended to eat the snake, I'd still be squicked because acculturation, but it would be a lot more comprehensible for him to kill it.
 
MetroidJunkie said:
CKO87 said:
Too bad Megan can't sue him.
Click to expand...

I think it's more like she just doesn't want to. I think she may actually pity him because of his self destructive lifestyle. Plus, it would just give her unwanted attention anyway and she wants no part in it.
Click to expand...

She has a good case. I would go to law school on my own dime, take the bar in Virginia, and sue Chris pro bono for her just for the lulz.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom