Facebook Update: "Smiley" Review

[Rio]

Re: New FB Post.

Hold on, Smiley? http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/smiley_2012/ this thing? I haven't seen it, but it doesn't look like a very good movie at all to me.

Also, is anyone else completely unsurprised by the fact that even when he's reviewing a movie, he can't stop himself from switching to talking about himself again? But I guess the whole victim complex-part of the review was the reason he wrote it to begin with.

 

[CatParty]

Re: New FB Post.

or, did chris find the movie because he reads cole's site?

http://www.colesmithey.com/filmblog/201 ... ailer.html

 

[Alec Benson Leary]

Re: New FB Post.

Also, is anyone else completely unsurprised by the fact that even when he's reviewing a movie, he can't stop himself from switching to talking about himself again? But I guess the whole victim complex-part of the review was the reason he wrote it to begin with.

Well, yeah, it's the latter. Chris doesn't go find things that aren't about him and turn them so. He just talks about himself, and if he encounters something he thinks already applies to him, then he'll talk about that. But his interests are incredibly limited and he is really a very boring person. From the moment he wakes up til the moment he goes to bed, all he cares about is himself and his victimhood. He literally does not have any interests outside of that.

 

[He Sets Me On Fire]

Re: New FB Post.

Looks like Chris erased OP's response, and his super-mature follow up.

 

[DrChristianTroy]

I don't think the idea of showing R-Rated movies in high schools is that outlandish. Smileys can't be as bad as some of the birth footage you'd see in health class or the disturbing shit they make you watch for driver's ed.

To me it isn't the graphic content of the movie. In middle school we were shown Glory which was rated R. The baffling part is his reasoning of showing it. He thinks that a movie about a fictional, outlandish serial killer is a good deterrent of trolling that should be shown to children. That somehow this will decrease the suicide rate. What you have mentioned has it's purpose within a school curriculum. This can't even fulfill the purpose Chris wants because it lacks merit.

Also I can't be the only one that found things like red asphalt fairly tame. Maybe it's the sheen of 80's educational film but I didn't take it seriously.

Looks like Chris erased OP's response, and his super-mature follow up.

I was under the impression that it was a message not a comment on his review.

 

[Alec Benson Leary]

Re: New FB Post.

^Actually, that message back-and-forth is weird. Why doesn't Chris's user pic show up on his "fuck off" response? Instead there's just facebook's standin image for people who don't have pics. What's going on there?

 

[Marvin]

Re: New FB Post.

Hold on, Smiley? http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/smiley_2012/ this thing? I haven't seen it, but it doesn't look like a very good movie at all to me.

Oh, after Chris posted about it last night, we watched it together. It's ridiculously stupid. It's pretty much what old people would think of the internet if they spent five minutes on ED.

 

[KatsuKitty]

Re: New FB Post.

^Actually, that message back-and-forth is weird. Why doesn't Chris's user pic show up on his "fuck off" response? Instead there's just facebook's standin image for people who don't have pics. What's going on there?

I believe if you message people who are not your friends, they show up under a default profile (no profile image, and black text).

 

[Surtur]

Re: New FB Post.

How did the OP reply anyways? I thought you could not reply to his posts?

 

[CatParty]

Re: New FB Post.

Hold on, Smiley? http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/smiley_2012/ this thing? I haven't seen it, but it doesn't look like a very good movie at all to me.

Oh, after Chris posted about it last night, we watched it together. It's ridiculously stupid. It's pretty much what old people would think of the internet if they spent five minutes on ED.

they obviously haven't seen "cyberbully"


[youtube]QiYGwGq399Y[/youtube]


actually i'd love to hear what chris thinks of that cinematic gem

 

[Alec Benson Leary]

Re: New FB Post.

^He would think "hey, I sure would like to have sex with that pretty teen girl as soon as she turns 18".

 

[DrChristianTroy]

Re: New FB Post.

Hold on, Smiley? http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/smiley_2012/ this thing? I haven't seen it, but it doesn't look like a very good movie at all to me.

Oh, after Chris posted about it last night, we watched it together. It's ridiculously stupid. It's pretty much what old people would think of the internet if they spent five minutes on ED.

they obviously haven't seen "cyberbully"


[youtube]QiYGwGq399Y[/youtube]


actually i'd love to hear what chris thinks of that cinematic gem

Well it has the chick from Hannah Montana so it'd be right up his alley.

 

[The Hunter]

Re: New FB Post.

How did the OP reply anyways? I thought you could not reply to his posts?

You can always message other people as long as they exist. However, if they block you, you can no longer view their profile or message them anymore. Which is why Chris's name is in black and his profile pic is gone in OP's pic.

 

[Alec Benson Leary]

Re: New FB Post.

How did the OP reply anyways? I thought you could not reply to his posts?

You can always message other people as long as they exist. However, if they block you, you can no longer view their profile or message them anymore. Which is why Chris's name is in black and his profile pic is gone in OP's pic.

Oh, that makes sense. If there's one thing Chris knows how to do, it's block other people so he can't hear reason.

 

[DevilDog]

Re: New FB Post.

How did the OP reply anyways? I thought you could not reply to his posts?

You can always message other people as long as they exist. However, if they block you, you can no longer view their profile or message them anymore. Which is why Chris's name is in black and his profile pic is gone in OP's pic.

So OP can't message Chris anymore then? The way to tell would be that his pic is gone?

 

[LM 697]

Re: New FB Post.

I demand that potrzebie's new usertitle should be "fuck-face".

 

[DevilDog]

Re: New FB Post.

Hold on, Smiley? http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/smiley_2012/ this thing? I haven't seen it, but it doesn't look like a very good movie at all to me.

Oh, after Chris posted about it last night, we watched it together. It's ridiculously stupid. It's pretty much what old people would think of the internet if they spent five minutes on ED.

they obviously haven't seen "cyberbully"


[youtube]QiYGwGq399Y[/youtube]


actually i'd love to hear what chris thinks of that cinematic gem

Can't even get the cap off, well, they are child proof xD.

 

[CatParty]

Re: New FB Post.

I demand that potrzebie's new usertitle should be "fuck-face".

seconded!

 

[The Hunter]

How did the OP reply anyways? I thought you could not reply to his posts?

You can always message other people as long as they exist. However, if they block you, you can no longer view their profile or message them anymore. Which is why Chris's name is in black and his profile pic is gone in OP's pic.

So OP can't message Chris anymore then? The way to tell would be that his pic is gone?

Yeah. I've blocked people and been blocked before on Facebook. Should still work that way. Of course, they can always make an alt account with a different email address and try again, but chances are Chris'd block them as soon as a new message arrives in his inbox.

I demand that potrzebie's new usertitle should be "fuck-face".

Actually, I think it would be better if we gave all banned users the reason, "fuck off fuck-face," from now on.

 

[DevilDog]

Re: New FB Post.

Yeah. I've blocked people and been blocked before on Facebook. Should still work that way. Of course, they can always make an alt account with a different email address and try again, but chances are Chris'd block them as soon as a new message arrives in his inbox.

So, if his pic is still there in a private message, then he hasn't blocked you?