- Joined
- Mar 6, 2023
Moral of the story:
If a boomer isn't acting like a cranky uptight asshole, somethings up.
If a boomer isn't acting like a cranky uptight asshole, somethings up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good god, they're so concerned about their beloved rules that even overwhelming evidence (including admissions by the guy himself) isn't enough to get this shit put on his page. Un-fucking-real. There's a couple of sane voices on the talk page, and they're 100% right when they openly accuse these "editors" of deliberately trying to protect this pervert. It's especially telling that one of them threatened to "report" the user for daring to make the accusation. "Methinks he doth protest too much."Also wikipedia editors are fighting over his page
Talk:Tom Willett - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Yeah, I was gonna mention this too. Wikipedia's running damage control for him for some reason, saying the accusations are unreliable and not sourced even though he himself admitted to them in a now-removed video that can easily be found reuploaded.Good god, they're so concerned about their beloved rules that even overwhelming evidence (including admissions by the guy himself) isn't enough to get this shit put on his page. Un-fucking-real. There's a couple of sane voices on the talk page, and they're 100% right when they openly accuse these "editors" of deliberately trying to protect this pervert. It's especially telling that one of them threatened to "report" the user for daring to make the accusation. "Methinks he doth protest too much."
It's fucking disgusting that wretched site is actually relied upon by anybody as a reliable reference for anything.
It's not a surprise when you see what masquerades as "news" across the spectrum.It's fucking disgusting that wretched site is actually relied upon by anybody as a reliable reference for anything.
The victim was 14 years old at the time of his offenses.This isn't meant to sound apologist, I genuinely don't know, but doesn't a life sentence seem excessive for this? At least from a legal standpoint. Is that a normal sentence for this? I could see them throwing the book harder because we're talking about homosexuality in 1978. Is that possibly why this got overturned later and why he's trying to defend it?
Did you even read the decision that you linked? The Nevada Supreme Court did not overturn the conviction and had nothing to do with the sentencing. Rather, it explicitly affirmed the trial court's decision to allow the prosecutor to present evidence of a different but similar crime.From what I can gather (mainly here ) he got out of jail despite receiving three life sentences because the judge allowed the prosecution to present evidence of a different crime into the trial.
Nevada Supreme Court said:A jury found appellant Thomas Willett guilty of three counts of violation of NRS 201.190, the infamous crime against nature. He was sentenced to life imprisonment with the possibility of parole on each count with the terms to run concurrently. The sentences were suspended and appellant was placed on probation for a period not to exceed five years with the first year to be served in the Clark County jail. He seeks reversal of his judgment of conviction on the principal ground that the court erred in admitting testimony concerning his illicit sexual relationship with another person other than the victim in the instant case.
The record shows that appellant in November, 1973, while playing in a musical group volunteered to entertain the children at Child Haven in Las Vegas. There he met the victim of this crime, a minor boy. He went with the boy to his room to introduce him to the guitar, but the session ended in the first of several acts of oral copulation on the minor. During the same month appellant visited the Eddie Lee Home for boys in Clark County. There he met a minor boy who testified that while the defendant, a volunteer worker, was "helping us to set up for Christmas", the defendant performed an act of oral copulation upon the young man. This testimony was admitted during the State's case-in-chief, and it is the admission of this testimony upon which the appellant seeks reversal of his judgment of conviction.
...
In the case at hand, the sexual acts committed on the victim and the witness were close in time, both occurring in November of 1973; the circumstances were similar, both were minors in homes for boys; and the modus operandi was the same, both boys were approached while the defendant worked as a "volunteer" at their institutions. This case is squarely within the fourth exception of the criteria listed in Nester, that is, to show "a common scheme or plan".
...
We do not believe the district judge in the case before us abused his discretion in admitting the witness' testimony. The court, in a pretrial hearing and in a hearing without the presence of the jury, balanced the proffered testimony against its probative value, and then determined that the probative value of the evidence outweighed its prejudicial effect. We cannot rule, based on the facts presented, that the lower court abused its discretion. Therefore, we affirm appellant's judgment of conviction.
Fuck.
FeatureMan’s telling of it, while omitting it was with a minor.
Edit: he pulled the video from YouTube, was re-uploaded to Vimeo.
![]()
Y2Mate.is - My Jailhouse Adventures Recommended For Adults Only-YPBUzaZLSmA-720p-1656321911656.mp4
This is "Y2Mate.is - My Jailhouse Adventures Recommended For Adults Only-YPBUzaZLSmA-720p-1656321911656.mp4" by Ray C on Vimeo, the home for high quality…vimeo.com
Yeah, I'm not clicking that. Whats it say?So redditors traced his email to a website where he posted about pedo shit
You mean, put them down like a lame horse? It was right there.I should honestly just put people this fucking lame down like rabid animals.
Regardless of if it would have been legal or not; it should be at least life (I say we kill ‘em all) from a moral standpoint.The victim was 14 years old at the time of his offenses.