Featureman/Tom Wilett - Creator of OFFICIAL eating tutorials and recipes

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I only ever saw the watermelon video of him.
Was wondering why a old man was 'cloning' himself in a youtube-video where he ate a Watermelon.
Seemed like a pretty lonely-people-thing to do.
Thought he might have had his wife die before him or something.
Kinda sad.

Now i know.
100% chance hes got shit on his computers.
 
Also wikipedia editors are fighting over his page
Good god, they're so concerned about their beloved rules that even overwhelming evidence (including admissions by the guy himself) isn't enough to get this shit put on his page. Un-fucking-real. There's a couple of sane voices on the talk page, and they're 100% right when they openly accuse these "editors" of deliberately trying to protect this pervert. It's especially telling that one of them threatened to "report" the user for daring to make the accusation. "Methinks he doth protest too much."

It's fucking disgusting that wretched site is actually relied upon by anybody as a reliable reference for anything.
 
This is such a bummer. I always wondered about his personal life, why he seemed to have no friends or family. I had some suspicions, but I wasn't expecting him to be a flaming pedofaggot. The fact that a lot of this stuff was more or less out in the open waiting for someone to discover is insane. We all really just assumed he was a quirky old man.
 
screenshot of his old website, he used to go to gay pride events and record everyone with a camcorder
edit. not everyone, just young men with muscles
 

Attachments

  • 2035181F-C3E7-49B9-8365-2C7D7F8B26B7.jpeg
    2035181F-C3E7-49B9-8365-2C7D7F8B26B7.jpeg
    1.6 MB · Views: 107
Literally just a few weeks ago I thought of this guy and was like "Oh yeah, that's a wholesome food channel." I guess there'll never be justice for his victim(s?), but it's at least nice to see a bunch of Youtuber united and lit a collective fire under his ass.
Good god, they're so concerned about their beloved rules that even overwhelming evidence (including admissions by the guy himself) isn't enough to get this shit put on his page. Un-fucking-real. There's a couple of sane voices on the talk page, and they're 100% right when they openly accuse these "editors" of deliberately trying to protect this pervert. It's especially telling that one of them threatened to "report" the user for daring to make the accusation. "Methinks he doth protest too much."

It's fucking disgusting that wretched site is actually relied upon by anybody as a reliable reference for anything.
Yeah, I was gonna mention this too. Wikipedia's running damage control for him for some reason, saying the accusations are unreliable and not sourced even though he himself admitted to them in a now-removed video that can easily be found reuploaded.
 
Last edited:
It's fucking disgusting that wretched site is actually relied upon by anybody as a reliable reference for anything.
It's not a surprise when you see what masquerades as "news" across the spectrum.

Edit: I, along with many others are extremely disappointed to find out about Featureman's past. I did a mea culpa in the YouTubers that are cool thread because the facade he put on was so different to all the bullshit we see on the regular. What a fucking fraud.
 
This isn't meant to sound apologist, I genuinely don't know, but doesn't a life sentence seem excessive for this? At least from a legal standpoint. Is that a normal sentence for this? I could see them throwing the book harder because we're talking about homosexuality in 1978. Is that possibly why this got overturned later and why he's trying to defend it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TouchFluffyTail
This isn't meant to sound apologist, I genuinely don't know, but doesn't a life sentence seem excessive for this? At least from a legal standpoint. Is that a normal sentence for this? I could see them throwing the book harder because we're talking about homosexuality in 1978. Is that possibly why this got overturned later and why he's trying to defend it?
The victim was 14 years old at the time of his offenses.
 
From what I can gather (mainly here ) he got out of jail despite receiving three life sentences because the judge allowed the prosecution to present evidence of a different crime into the trial.
Did you even read the decision that you linked? The Nevada Supreme Court did not overturn the conviction and had nothing to do with the sentencing. Rather, it explicitly affirmed the trial court's decision to allow the prosecutor to present evidence of a different but similar crime.
Nevada Supreme Court said:
A jury found appellant Thomas Willett guilty of three counts of violation of NRS 201.190, the infamous crime against nature. He was sentenced to life imprisonment with the possibility of parole on each count with the terms to run concurrently. The sentences were suspended and appellant was placed on probation for a period not to exceed five years with the first year to be served in the Clark County jail. He seeks reversal of his judgment of conviction on the principal ground that the court erred in admitting testimony concerning his illicit sexual relationship with another person other than the victim in the instant case.
The record shows that appellant in November, 1973, while playing in a musical group volunteered to entertain the children at Child Haven in Las Vegas. There he met the victim of this crime, a minor boy. He went with the boy to his room to introduce him to the guitar, but the session ended in the first of several acts of oral copulation on the minor. During the same month appellant visited the Eddie Lee Home for boys in Clark County. There he met a minor boy who testified that while the defendant, a volunteer worker, was "helping us to set up for Christmas", the defendant performed an act of oral copulation upon the young man. This testimony was admitted during the State's case-in-chief, and it is the admission of this testimony upon which the appellant seeks reversal of his judgment of conviction.
...
In the case at hand, the sexual acts committed on the victim and the witness were close in time, both occurring in November of 1973; the circumstances were similar, both were minors in homes for boys; and the modus operandi was the same, both boys were approached while the defendant worked as a "volunteer" at their institutions. This case is squarely within the fourth exception of the criteria listed in Nester, that is, to show "a common scheme or plan".
...
We do not believe the district judge in the case before us abused his discretion in admitting the witness' testimony. The court, in a pretrial hearing and in a hearing without the presence of the jury, balanced the proffered testimony against its probative value, and then determined that the probative value of the evidence outweighed its prejudicial effect. We cannot rule, based on the facts presented, that the lower court abused its discretion. Therefore, we affirm appellant's judgment of conviction.
 
whats mind-boggling is how much of an online presence he had spanning over two decades. pretty sure before he shoahd his YT there were something short of 2,000 videos. plus all of his hollywood “”stardom””. shit he even has a subleddit dedicated to him.


null can we have a suicide prediction poll plz
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Toolbox
Fuck.

FeatureMan’s telling of it, while omitting it was with a minor.

Edit: he pulled the video from YouTube, was re-uploaded to Vimeo.


Just in case, since it's already been re-uploaded once.
 
Back