- Joined
- May 30, 2023
Are you sure that's not a heart medication logo?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you sure that's not a heart medication logo?
I'm pretty sureAre you sure that's not a heart medication logo?
I actually despise the overly simplistic redesigns. Most look like corporate powerpoint presentation art. The green and wavy lines especially hit me weird, as if they are making a flag for a new brand of diet soda or a new band aid.
I fucking hate the whole premise of redesigning flags, no matter how good or bad looking they are. It’s sad to see the old flags go, because even if they’re ugly they have history and charm to them. These new flags look soulless, and they’re obviously made to appear as “brand icons” and to distance themselves from “evil white supremacy” or some shit. It doesn’t feel like a legitimate reason to replace a flag at all.
For reference, the three finalists:
You reposted the video, 2 huge pictures (which were referenced in the video), your essay, and then posted TLDR. Put the TL;DR first FFS.For reference, the three finalists:
View attachment 5568126
View attachment 5568127
View attachment 5568128
@Black Man Underwear I get your point but you're a bit MATI. Yes in flaglore there's a split between two styles - "corporate redesign" and "flag nerd's cool concept." The first is regrettably popular right now (especially during the current wave of flag makeovers) but it's not that bad. The new flags of Mississippi and Utah have heraldic meaning for example. This last proposal is good, it has meaning (outline of Minnesota, North Star, snowy forest colors). It doesn't need to be in the federal colors because states can have their own colors.
TLDR: Calm down before posting.
Just be glad Corporate Memphis/Alegria/globohomo hasn't invaded flags. Yet.Tbh, I am just glad the modern art redesigns were rejected in favor of something traditional if simple.
Stylized animals and things like wheat are really common in even old heraldry.The Loon is definitely imposing, and the native American name for the region fits historically. So it gets a pass.
Source: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojh...n/members/null.1/#profile-post-comment-548194Null said:Yes. The modern concept of a flag was not a thing in the Medieval times, so what you'd see instead of flags are family crests, and land was represented by these crests. Important, powerful rulers who held lots of crowns would had composite crests featuring dozens of extremely disjointed designs matched together. The closest contemporary example is is the Maryland flag, which is a combination of the coat of arms for Calvert and Crossland families.
The HRE had dozens of constituents, so here is the HRE's coat of arms.
Kentucky being the Awkward Slowdance State is memorable, at least.
Yeah, so I am with the "fuck the haters" crowd on this one. Minnesota's redesign Commission did a good job. The Polaris Tricolor and the Angry Loon Seal hit all the beats. Easily identified, grounded in the land, and most important of all won't look dated in 100 years.Stylized animals and things like wheat are really common in even old heraldry.
Couldn't they at least have made the chevron yellow or green, or at least some color besides light blue? It clashes pretty hard with the darker blue.They fucked up at the Finish line. It's hideous. Legitimately PowerPoint Clip Art.
View attachment 5579050