ordinarycough
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2014
After looking through the things they've written and "liked" from the profiles of the kiwi members who were kind enough to share their fluffy accounts with us I can safely say there quite a bit of troll shielding going on in this topic. When you are willingly enjoying explicit pictures of ponies getting aroused for neckbeards or bathing in their own piss and shit you are not in a position to say that there are other "actual" lolcows in the community or that it is an intellectual exercise for you.
This is literally just fantasizing about murdering and raping retarded baby animals in the most gruesome fashion possible. You know how those people who end up abusing animals or children irl get their start? They go through an ideation phase, thinking and fantasizing about what they might do to another living thing before they decide to start doing it. A big part of that is rationalizing and intellectualizing or even romanticizing it. Most, if not all, start with animals. Obviously it cannot apply to literally every person who does this thing, but for many in the fluffy community this is their ideation phase. That this fluffy thing has sexual undertones is a giant red flag.
If this is something you have enjoyed being a part of you need to go see a therapist, not defend it on the internet.
But why draw so much attention to all the specific little details about the mutilated retarded animal? If your intention really was "look at this asshole" that really wasn't the focus of your story. It just sounds like you are intellectualizing it. In all of these fuzzy stories with people, they are torturing the animals. You weren't breaking new ground or deconstructing anything there. It is literally the same as everyone else's stories.
But even then, you wrote a second, more explicit story about the animal freezing to death drawing special attention to the fact they had ripped skin, broken limbs, emotional abuse, and was covered in piss. The guy we're supposed to be disgusted by is not in the second story. What's the point of that story? I mean come on the first comment on that story is a guy talking about how turned on he is by your story of mutilation and baby animal death.
This is literally just fantasizing about murdering and raping retarded baby animals in the most gruesome fashion possible. You know how those people who end up abusing animals or children irl get their start? They go through an ideation phase, thinking and fantasizing about what they might do to another living thing before they decide to start doing it. A big part of that is rationalizing and intellectualizing or even romanticizing it. Most, if not all, start with animals. Obviously it cannot apply to literally every person who does this thing, but for many in the fluffy community this is their ideation phase. That this fluffy thing has sexual undertones is a giant red flag.
If this is something you have enjoyed being a part of you need to go see a therapist, not defend it on the internet.
That's not really what the story was about.
When I learned that some people actually froze their animals to death as a form of home euthanasia, I was horrified. So I wrote a story about a person who was selfish and shallow, who wanted the easy way out, because he valued his time and money more than the well being of an innocent animal. You're not supposed to sympathize with the protagonist; you're supposed to be disgusted by him.
But why draw so much attention to all the specific little details about the mutilated retarded animal? If your intention really was "look at this asshole" that really wasn't the focus of your story. It just sounds like you are intellectualizing it. In all of these fuzzy stories with people, they are torturing the animals. You weren't breaking new ground or deconstructing anything there. It is literally the same as everyone else's stories.
But even then, you wrote a second, more explicit story about the animal freezing to death drawing special attention to the fact they had ripped skin, broken limbs, emotional abuse, and was covered in piss. The guy we're supposed to be disgusted by is not in the second story. What's the point of that story? I mean come on the first comment on that story is a guy talking about how turned on he is by your story of mutilation and baby animal death.
Last edited: