wtfNeedSignUp
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
It's strongly implied in the prophecy given to Dany.Is it confirmed fact that "Aegon" is in fact false?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's strongly implied in the prophecy given to Dany.Is it confirmed fact that "Aegon" is in fact false?
Unless there had been indications otherwise, this Aegon is false until proven otherwise. There has been too many witnesses to the Mad King's fall to have an additional secret child somewhere.Is it confirmed fact that "Aegon" is in fact false?
Mummer's dragon.Is it confirmed that "Aegon" is in fact false?
I can tell by the casting choices alone that it's going to be a mess, they got that goofy looking guy from Doctor Who to play Daemon Targaryen who is supposed to be this rugged adventurer type, some dumpy looking chick for Rhaenyra Targaryen who was known as 'the realm's delight' and one of the most beautiful women ever and they made fucking Corlys Velaryon black which makes no sense whatsoever since the Velaryons came from Valyria with the Targaryens and are essentially a Targaryen cadet branch with the same pale skin, silver hair and purple eyes.its the upcoming show, one of three spinoffs to GoT, mostly likely going to be a trainwreck
I think people read too deeply into this. I never took it to mean he's shitting on Tolkien but that he wanted to do something different, which is kind of the reason most of us are reading ASoIaF.Martin thinks he's better than Tolkien.
Nah, he shits on Tolkien all of the time. Catelyn and Jon are both brought back from the dead because he didn't like how Tolkien did it with Gandalf.I think people read too deeply into this. I never took it to mean he's shitting onhh/ Tolkien but that he wanted to do something different, which is kind of the reason most of us are reading ASoIaF.
Unsurprising that he completely misses the point of Gandalf's resurrection. Gandalf is strongly implied within the story (and outright explicitly stated in secondary material) to be a higher being of sorts, someone who was sent to Middle-Earth to ensure the forces of good prevail. Tolkien himself likened Gandalf to an angel incarnate.Nah, he shits on Tolkien all of the time. Catelyn and Jon are both brought back from the dead because he didn't like how Tolkien did it with Gandalf.
He was also a veteran of the Somme who lost most of his friends in the war, while Martin chilled in the States during Vietnam asOne major detail not mentioned in the thread is Tolkien had real jobs and a career throughout his adult life and writing was something he did on the side.
You can tell Tolkien expirienced the most brutal and terrible war in human history, a lot of the stuff set in Mordor seems like he's drawing from personal memories regarding nomansland and the trenches. Like when Sam and Frodo are forced to drink some putrid, stinking water since it's the only spring that they could find. Some other things, like the arrival of reinforcements to a raging battle and how it turns the tides, seems pretty in line with those memories, too.He was also a veteran of the Somme who lost most of his friends in the war, while Martin chilled in the States during Vietnam astoo fat for basic traininga conscientious objector.
Some other things, like the arrival of reinforcements to a raging battle and how it turns the tides, seems pretty in line with those memories, too.
I mean, just compare a shitty writer like Chuck Wendig, who dares speaking up against such masters like Tolkien, and what kind of life that guy had compared to a veteran and scholar like Tolkien. I don't know where to put Martin in this spectrum, I would wager that he at least read enough stuff and is smart enough to think and theorize about some things, so he can put certain themes into his books, kinda like they were second hand experience based on his readings whereas someone like Wendig isn't even worthy of offering his works as a substitute for toilet paper to a writer like Tolkien.
The eerie, preserved, and haunted corpses in the Dead Marshes (leftovers from the battles to invade Mordor over 3000 years before) were directly inspired by things like the soldiers who drowned in the mud at Passchendaele by the thousands.
Say what you will about Martin, it's clear he's had real life experiences (if not on the level of being a Great War combat veteran), where writers like Wendig are mostly drawing on the stuff they've absorbed from writers who came before them. There's a similar problem with comic books, where the great writers and artists of the last generation were blue collar dudes and veterans, while now comics are being made by ... comics fans. Yech.
And these tards now win Hugo awards like clockwork, since all it takes is sucking the right cock and kissing the right asses, writing ability is no longer a requirement to be an award-winning author.
There's a bit from How Not to Write a Novel that summarizes this: "God can work with the most mind-bending coincidences, far-fetched plot contrivances, and perverse dramatic ironies, never giving a moment's thought to whether or not his audience will buy it. You do not have this luxury." When writing a fantastical world, internal consistency is important (which Martin realizes) but part of that consistency is following through even if the realism is questionable. If you have Sir So-and-so who's got a career-defining joust coming up that you've been building towards for half a novel, don't have him step on a rusty nail and die of lockjaw out of nowhere, even though tetanus was something that really killed people in the Middle Ages. If the story is going to end on a complete anticlimax, you probably should just remove it.The folly of realism is that reality is so much more complex and bizarre. Constantine, Alexander, Genghis Kahn, Nobunaga, Atilla, and so many others are remembered for the nearly impossible achievements they made.
I've seen people try to make excuses, that the inconsistency of the seasons don't allow for development, that constant warfare doesn't allow for development, that there's a secret sci-fi order holding society back, etc. These are all excuses for a critical lack of accuracy in an accuracy based series and don't explain things like how the "common tongue" is able to be spoken across an entire feudal continent for 8,000 years.
Unsurprising that he completely misses the point of Gandalf's resurrection. Gandalf is strongly implied within the story (and outright explicitly stated in secondary material) to be a higher being of sorts, someone who was sent to Middle-Earth to ensure the forces of good prevail. Tolkien himself likened Gandalf to an angel incarnate.
I wish Harlan Ellison was still alive to give his grumpy old man take on this.And these tards now win Hugo awards like clockwork
yeah, I’m imagining a major sci-fi twist is largely reaponsible for his procrastination and hesitation.Wait, isn't "feudal stasis that's secretly enforced by high-tech alien cabal" the premise of the Gor books?
Considering how sex usually shakes out in ASoIaF, I'm starting to see a resemblance.