- Joined
- Mar 20, 2013
Car video and wearing a gamer mic... Is he trying to advertise to the world he's a virgin?
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Apparently white people no longer run Google.
View attachment 260101
Because it broke ranks with the narrative. It asked questions that can't be asked, because the entire worldview that leads to the idea "women are underrepresented in tech because they're oppressed!" falls apart when you ask whether most women are actually interested in the field.I don't get the hate. He makes GOOD POINTS and even if you don't agree with him or if he is in fact wrong on some things - NOTHING justifies this insane witch hunt.
He didn't wrote the memo because he hates women or minorities. He wrote them because he wants to help to get MORE women into engineering.
He also says that he still likes google - which is heartbreaking because they don't deserve this. If I was the google CEO, I would offer him another job and work with him to establish ACTUAL diversity. This might be the only thing to end this PR nightmare.
I don't get the hate. He makes GOOD POINTS and even if you don't agree with him or if he is in fact wrong on some things - NOTHING justifies this insane witch hunt.
He didn't wrote the memo because he hates women or minorities. He wrote them because he wants to help to get MORE women into engineering.
He also says that he still likes google - which is heartbreaking because they don't deserve this. If I was the google CEO, I would offer him another job and work with him to establish ACTUAL diversity. This might be the only thing to end this PR nightmare.
I don't get the hate. He makes GOOD POINTS and even if you don't agree with him or if he is in fact wrong on some things - NOTHING justifies this insane witch hunt.
He didn't wrote the memo because he hates women or minorities. He wrote them because he wants to help to get MORE women into engineering.
THIS! FUCKING! POST! I hereby bestow upon it all my Winner, Agree and Like ratings! I mean how many times have we heard "Women are under represented REEEEEEEEEEE" "OH thats bad, what STEM are you studying?" "Oh STEM is misogynistic I'm doing black womens sexual rape studies at an independent feminist college in Puerto Rico!"Because it broke ranks with the narrative. It asked questions that can't be asked, because the entire worldview that leads to the idea "women are underrepresented in tech because they're oppressed!" falls apart when you ask whether most women are actually interested in the field.
Its obvious as hell though, they out competed the other search engines largely thanks to unlimited "investor" funding, no ads, while always finding the money to eat its competitors and bury them and remain ahead of the competition with its search engine, which used to be pretty good. I miss having yahoo as a home page, purely for the news section. I miss Ask Jeeves, Dogpile, and others being relevant.This is all true. Go read Assange's When Google Met Wikileaks. It's all in there, and it's scary as hell.
The fuck?work 80+ hour weeks without asking for overtime.
Apparently white people no longer run Google.
View attachment 260101
Because it broke ranks with the narrative. It asked questions that can't be asked, because the entire worldview that leads to the idea "women are underrepresented in tech because they're oppressed!" falls apart when you ask whether most women are actually interested in the field.
Google's diversity efforts fall flat
Bottom line: Despite Google and its parent company's public statements in support of diversity in technology and multiple outreach and community programs, it seems to have made little headway since it began publishing its workforce demographic data three years ago. For example, U.S. Latino employees now make up 5% of the overall workforce and professional jobs, up from 3% each in 2013, and women now hold 13% of leadership positions, up from 8%. At the same time, black employees still only make up 2% of all U.S. jobs, 2% of technical ones, and 3% of executive roles.
Google declined to provide additional information when asked how it evaluates the effectiveness of its efforts, pointing to its diversity website.
I think there actually are artificial barriers to entry that disproportionately affect women. Few of these, now, are actual, deliberate, malicious sexism. Many are structural or inadvertent, or just related to the fact people hire people who are like themselves, and many of these people are men.
Still, even if you removed every single artificial barrier and installed active measures to recruit and foster women in tech, I think you're just going to find fewer women who actually want to be there than men.
I think the women (and other minorities) who actually do succeed in the field are entirely the equals of their male counterparts.
Still, there are fewer of them, and there probably always will be. This isn't a bad or a good thing. It's just a thing.