GPUs & CPUs & Enthusiast hardware: Questions, Discussion and fanboy slap-fights - Nvidia & AMD & Intel - Separe but Equal. Intel rides in the back of the bus.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
An interesting little note, the Mac mini turns 20 today.

Launched in 2005, with:
OS: OSX 10.3 Panther
CPU: 1.25 GHz/1.42 GHz G4
RAM: 256 MB of PC2700 DDR RAM (upgradeable to 1 GB),
GPU: ATI Radeon 9200 32 MB dedicated DDR
Storage: 40 or 80 GB hard drive. Updated twice, before it received the Intel Core Solo/Core Duo in 2006.

For those curious, a decade later, it had:
OS: OSX 10.10 Yosemite
CPU: 1.4/2.6/2.8 GHz dual core i5, could be configured to have a 3 GHz dual core i7
RAM: 4 - 8 GB 1600 MHz LPDDR3 (upgradeable to 16 GB)
GPU: Intel HD Graphics 5000 / Intel Iris Graphics 5100 (could use up to 1.5/2 GB system RAM)
Storage: 500 GB/1 TB hard drive, 1 TB fusion drive or a 256 GB SSD.

Not the first mini PC out there, but it probably drew a lot of others in.
 
70% off from AliExpress, a price that is putting it well below the price of used cards, doesn't seem shady at all. Go for it. Buy three and sell the other two for profit on ebay.
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Brain Problems
I didn't even know Soyo still existed, let alone made graphics cards.
They don't and they don't

70% off from AliExpress, a price that is putting it well below the price of used cards, doesn't seem shady at all. Go for it. Buy three and sell the other two for profit on ebay.
And they get refund denied and are out of money and with rebaked 980 card with fake drivers

I mean, go for it. I want to see how it turns out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brain Problems
VideoCardz: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 “Blackwell” Graphics Cards Review Roundup

Tom's Hardware
vs. 40904K Ultra1440p Ultra1080p Ultra1080p Medium
Raster+25.1%+13%+3.18%+0.3%
Ray Tracing DXR+37.5%+14.6%-4.2%+4.4%

They are finding the 9800X3D w/ 5090 in the lead in raster, 13900K w/ 5090 in ray tracing (usually), so I picked the top result.

Power draw at 4K Ultra is 476W (9800X3D) to 500W (13900K) which is 18.7-24.7% more than the 4090's 401W average.


Raster 4K ranges from around +20-50%, Ray tracing 4K from around +27-35%


Raster 1080p = +1%, 1440p = +12.3%, 4K = +26.9%
Ray tracing (5 games) 1080p = +13.8%, 1440p = +17.1%
 
Last edited:
I'm genuinely curious. They may actually be 3060s but counterfeit in one way or another
It was weird how the $100 3070s only had 8gb of ram tho.
 
VideoCardz: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 “Blackwell” Graphics Cards Review Roundup

Tom's Hardware
vs. 40904K Ultra1440p Ultra1080p Ultra1080p Medium
Raster+25.1%+13%+3.18%+0.3%
Ray Tracing DXR+37.5%+14.6%-4.2%+4.4%

They are finding the 9800X3D w/ 5090 in the lead in raster, 13900K w/ 5090 in ray tracing (usually), so I picked the top result.

Power draw at 4K Ultra is 476W (9800X3D) to 500W (13900K) which is 18.7-24.7% more than the 4090's 401W average.


Raster 4K = +20-50%, Ray tracing 4K = +27-35%

IMG_7273.png

another chart from TPU, 15-52% uplift depending on games
basically exactly what everyone expected
 
from what GN said you pretty much need a 4k 120hz gaming monitor to get any real use out of it and its CPU bottlenecked on anything under 4k. When did 4k monitors over 60hz even come out?

edit:2018 was the answer
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Betonhaus
from what GN said you pretty much need a 4k 120hz gaming monitor to get any real use out of it and its CPU bottlenecked on anything under 4k. When did 4k monitors over 60hz even come out?
mate we’ve had 4K 240Hz OLEDs for a while now, anyone buying this GPU is going to have a top tier premium monitor as well
 
T
from what GN said you pretty much need a 4k 120hz gaming monitor to get any real use out of it and its CPU bottlenecked on anything under 4k. When did 4k monitors over 60hz even come out?
here's a lot, but they're all over like $500.
Honestly we might as well be agonizing over changes Rolex makes to their latest $20,000 watch. What happens at the high end is meaningless to most of us
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Ugly One
from what GN said you pretty much need a 4k 120hz gaming monitor to get any real use out of it and its CPU bottlenecked on anything under 4k. When did 4k monitors over 60hz even come out?
My 4k120Hz TV was made in 2020, we’ve had them for a while.
 
Intel confirms Core Ultra 3 205 CPU with 8 cores, then removes the specs

4+4 cores, 2 (of 4) Xe cores. Good iteration on the low-end i3-12100/i3-13100.

The gimped iGPU may be faster than UHD 770, not sure. But there could be a Core Ultra 3 215 above this with 3-4 Xe cores.

from what GN said you pretty much need a 4k 120hz gaming monitor to get any real use out of it and its CPU bottlenecked on anything under 4k. When did 4k monitors over 60hz even come out?
You're late. 4K 240 Hz are not hard to find, and the first 27" 4K 240 Hz OLED was just launched this month according to search results.
 
Given that Cyberpunk 2077 can't hit 60 fps at max settings on a 4090, sounds like an exaggeration.
4K, Avg FPS (rounded down)509040905090 RT4090 RT
FFXIV181138
Black Myth: Wukong85668865
Starfield10792
Dragon's Dogma 21329811385
Cyberpunk 2077 (Phantom Liberty)95635339
Dying Light 21269110879
Resident Evil 4206151209159

Gamers Nexus: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWSlOC_jiLQ
 
Can we just say this is a repeat of the 400 and 500 series or
5080 is 4080 ti
5090 is 4090 ti
5090 might be +30-35% generously, which is better than what a 4090 Ti would have been. But it's using a lot of power to get there.

Maybe 5080 vs. 4080 Super will be even worse than expected.

CoresClocksBandwidthTDP
509021,760 (+32.8%)2.01 - 2.41 GHz1792 GB/s (+77.8%)575 W
409016,3842.23 - 2.521008450 W
508010,752 (+5%)2.30 - 2.62960 (+30.4%)360 W
4080 Super10,2402.205 - 2.55736320 W
40809,7282.21 - 2.505716.8320 W
 
Last edited:
Back