The last sentence is all you need. Troons and crossdressers are perverts. It's "all sexualized" because trooning out and cross-dressing are mental sickness related to perversions. If you want your children exposed to them it's because you've fallen for the trooniganda, they aren't "just a person too" they're one of the following;
- "just" mentally ill
- a pervert and mentally ill
- groomed to the point that mental illness set in
If you aren't naive, you don't want your children exposed to the mentally ill. You don't want the thought patterns of the mentally ill normalized in your child's impressionable mind. Do you want your children exposed to alcoholics because they're "just a person too"? How about junkies? Schizophrenics? Pathological liars? The last thing you want as a parent is for crazy degenerate behavior to be normalized in their minds.
Nobody is worse off? This shows a lack of experience on your part. Maybe you're from a sheltered ivory towers suburb or something but brazil is complete shithole that has a degenerate culture and brazilians are largely promiscuous, unscrupulous people. Just look at their country, just look at them. The fact that carnival is relatively less outwardly sexual and vile than pride events is staggering.
Well at least you had the balls to reply, rather than just negrate. I've made plenty of posts here piling on the troons political agendas but it's just boring just limp circlejerking all day long. And for a forum that hates reddit and people who cut their balls of there's way too much of that going on here.
First of all there are a few legitimate reasons to troon out.
There's a very slim minority of troons that have hormone-imbalances in them already with genetic issues that caused them to be "born in the wrong sex". These people have to take far fewer pills post/pre surgery because their bodies hormonally are already of the other sex. Now either you acknowledge this or you're yourself too mentally weak to face reality.
Second of all, that line of what is a mental illness or not is itself a societal construct. The whole DSM bible that psychologists use for determining it was by and large made from a fucking vote on their first congress in the 60s or something. And the line keeps changing depending on the society and the mores of that society with the exception of the few medically supported conditions like schizophrenia.
Now it's perfectly fine for a society to decide what is acceptable to it and what is not and throughout history some societies have completely forbidden these types of practices while in others they have existed on the margins of that society. Drag has been part of western culture for a fucking long time, with artists and performers engaging in it for hundreds of years
. British comedy is full of it, including the illustrious Monthy Python. But it was common even in renaissance fairs in the 16th century. The exploration of the female through the male is an artistic freedom I'm better off in having experienced, not worse.
Again though,
troonery as we have it in todays modern western world seems to be a result of other "mental illnesses" rather than a mental illness itself. Meaning we're indeed dealing with
outcasts, socially maladapt, people who have struggled with drugs or abuse, people who are depressed, etc. Changing "everything" about yourself is the
ultimate cop-out, the "get out of jail" free card. From all these issues, at least for a few moments, until it dawns upon most of them that all their problems still persist no matter what sex they have.
Thus the issue should be figuring out and stopping the people who pull the strings of the sexualization and promotion of it. Allowing for these people to function in society and not feel the need to form insulated bubbles that re-enforce their cop-outs should be part of that strategy.
And about
Brazil, you just sound like an uneducated backwater moron picking two metrics (Naked chicks on carnevals and violent societal collapse) and tying them together like there's any fucking link between the two. But anyone can make a mistake.
Here's
Argentina, a culture in other respects very different from the urban Brazilian one you caricatured. Its just part of Latin American culture where people aren't as sexually inhibited, partly by religious dogma on one side and on the other by rad-feminist propaganda.
It reminds me of moral conservatives in America preaching against sleazyness and time and time again being uncovered as being unfaithful, into weird fetish scenes, violent domestic abusers and/or polygamists.
I used to be quite sexually conservative in this way but the more I think about it the more I think I was wrong. It can become a problem when its used to promote degenerate sexuality as opposed to healthy. I'm not in favour of modern Gay parades or people looking like strippers (trans or not) reading stories to my children but perhaps, again, we're the reactionaries of our time, and perhaps that's not a bad thing. But its something worth keeping in mind.
What gives lads?
