- Joined
- May 18, 2024
I agree with the Stolas sucks part of your post, but I disagree with the idea characters shouldn't be likeable. Likeability is a big part of being captivated by what they do. If I don't like a character, it's hard to find what they're doing interesting because I won't really care what's going on with them. I think it's a big reason Hazbin is so bad, a lot of the characters are just so bland and boring and having no real charm to them, and the few that are likeable or potentially interesting tend to get shoved in the background so the bland and boring characters can take center stage. Or characters that seemed likeable in the pilot ultimately became boring and unlikeable in the main series.
It can also make or break the premise of a show. With shows like Dexter, where the main character is an undeniably bad person, you need to have said character be likeable, otherwise, all you have is hate watchers tuning in each week waiting to see if he dies. Hazbin fans latched onto Adam because he was likeable compared to the rest of the cast. And I think that was due to him basically saying he wants to murder all the likeable characters. If he was constantly threatening people the audience actually cared about, I'm sure he'd lose most of his fanbase. Smaller, more character focused shows are also make or break on whether the characters are likeable. Something like Six Feet Under would fall apart if you don't like at least some of the main characters because the show is really just about them.
But being a likeable character doesn't have to mean the same thing as being a likeable person. Obviously, we wouldn't befriend someone in the real world who wasn't likeable, but with fictional characters, you can like a character even if they're an in-universe monster. While he is by no means a monster, it's one of the reasons Kramer was so popular on Seinfeld. In reality, I don't think anyone would actually want to be friends with a guy like that who has zero respect for your privacy and constantly takes your food/personal items or rope you into crazy, potentially harmful schemes, but as a viewer, all those zany things are precisely what makes him likeable. Similarly, a show with the Bizzaro cast from that one episode where Elaine makes new friends that are the opposite of the main cast wouldn't work because, while all of those people are friendly and probably great to hang around in real life, following their plotlines would be really boring, so we wouldn't like the characters. It's also why a lot of Mary-sue types fail as characters, they're usually doing good things in the universe and making it a better place, but they just come off as so unlikeable that it's hard to care or root for them, even if what they're doing is good and their motivation makes sense.
I think we're conflating "likable" with "interesting". A character is that, a character. They're not a person. they are, at the most fundamental level, a vessel made to convey a story in a captivating way. If a character cannot convey a story, nor do it in an interesting way, then it has fundamentally failed as a character. I do agree that not all characters need to be Likable, I dont think you need to give your characters enjoyable personality traits, But if you cannot make said characters interesting, if you can't make them engaging to read/watch, then you have failed as a story writer.Characters in fiction shouldn't be likeable, in my opinion, especially if they're not made to sell shirts or twenty dollar plastic cutouts. The purpose of their existence will be achieved if you're captivated by what they do with their motives given reasons for. For me, I find Stolas to be the most unbearable and repulsive character in the series at the moment, which is a shame, because I absolutely adore his design reminiscent of furryfyed Grimm from Hollow Knight. His relationship with Blitz confuses me at most, as judging by their characters I can't find any cause why Blitz would decide to hang out with him in the first place: Stolas is a huge hypocrite with surface-level emotional intelligence, completely illogical feelings and his value of Blitz supported by the fact that he makes him "not feel lonely" is derogatorily deranged. I'm not sure if it would have been a better option to move with a more Stella-like-minus-anger-management-issues Stolas from the pilot, but it could be so much fascinating to witness their interaction in a form of a more intuitive relationship where both would want, but struggle to settle with each other because of different standards and beliefs, without openly emphasizing the fact that they have very subtle and sentimental mutual feelings. Instead there's a gay bird with a child that cucks his wife with a toony fiend.
I will admit that I haven't watched HH since the end of S1, I just can't be bothered to, but from my memory of the show and reading up on the discussion surrounding the current episodes, Blitzo/Stolas is a case of characters being not only unlikable, but just uninteresting to watch. They are set up in a way so that their relationship goes absolutely fucking nowhere, and any meaningful progress gets reset to zero.
Everybody knows where this shit's gonna end. Stolas is gonna remain an Uwu sad boi, Blitzo is still gonna be a dumb retard, and nobody is gonna have any impactful character development. It's gonna be the same dumb shit that everybody is tired of, and we know this because we've retreaded this shit before in the show; we know how this is gonna end because we've seen them in the same situation before. That is the failure of blitzo/stolas as characters. They are physically unable to progress the story in ways that aren't the same queer song & dance, over and over again. Their shit personalities are just the cherry on top.