Insurrection 2021

What's going to happen on January 6th?

  • TRUMP JUNTA GOVERNMENT

    Votes: 40 10.1%
  • CHICOM BIDEN ROUNDUP

    Votes: 18 4.5%
  • BOOMERS STANDING AROUND IN Q MERCH ACCOMPLISHING NOTHING

    Votes: 340 85.4%

  • Total voters
    398
  • Poll closed .
Soooo

Aside from the absolute sperging being done by TES and TDSers, I wanna talk about Kamala Harris not stepping down as a senator yet.

I realize there is a good amount of time until she is due to be sworn in, but traditionally I believe most VPs/Predident elects would have stepped down by now. Interestingly enough, the governor gets to hand pick her replacement.

Which comes off as stupid... i feel like if the Georgia run off election can happen,, there isn't too much of an excuse for not doing a quick one for her replacement. I'm not ignorant to the fact that we all know they would elect a Democrat to replace her, I just prefer an elective process over appointments if the original position was filled via an election.

But back to my original point.... what would be the logical/strategic reasoning for her dragging her feet to relinquish her current office? What does she gain by keeping it, that I am clearly missing.
 
Soooo

Aside from the absolute sperging being done by TES and TDSers, I wanna talk about Kamala Harris not stepping down as a senator yet.

I realize there is a good amount of time until she is due to be sworn in, but traditionally I believe most VPs/Predident elects would have stepped down by now. Interestingly enough, the governor gets to hand pick her replacement.

Which comes off as stupid... i feel like if the Georgia run off election can happen,, there isn't too much of an excuse for not doing a quick one for her replacement. I'm not ignorant to the fact that we all know they would elect a Democrat to replace her, I just prefer an elective process over appointments if the original position was filled via an election.

But back to my original point.... what would be the logical/strategic reasoning for her dragging her feet to relinquish her current office? What does she gain by keeping it, that I am clearly missing.
Probably still looking to appoint a successor to fill the seat.
 
Soooo

Aside from the absolute sperging being done by TES and TDSers, I wanna talk about Kamala Harris not stepping down as a senator yet.

I realize there is a good amount of time until she is due to be sworn in, but traditionally I believe most VPs/Predident elects would have stepped down by now. Interestingly enough, the governor gets to hand pick her replacement.

Which comes off as stupid... i feel like if the Georgia run off election can happen,, there isn't too much of an excuse for not doing a quick one for her replacement. I'm not ignorant to the fact that we all know they would elect a Democrat to replace her, I just prefer an elective process over appointments if the original position was filled via an election.

But back to my original point.... what would be the logical/strategic reasoning for her dragging her feet to relinquish her current office? What does she gain by keeping it, that I am clearly missing.
there's still issues for senators to vote for, like stimulus bill and other shit.
 
But back to my original point.... what would be the logical/strategic reasoning for her dragging her feet to relinquish her current office? What does she gain by keeping it, that I am clearly missing.
senate is still close and votes are happening. it's not that uncommon anyway. jfk, lbj, nixon hadn't resigned by now. biden resigned 5 days before he was inaugurated vp. there's probably older ones that went right up to the deadline but cba.
 
Mob refusing to leave capital building in Oregon, livestream: https://youtu.be/R1cOrWw9msc

cops about to start gassing and mass arrests.
>eagle flies by
>people lose their shit and start seal-clapping


Sounds about right.

edit: Oh god, they started yelling "FREEDOM!", I'm now one fat dude in stars-and-stripes shirt on a mobility shooter short of a full bingo.

Edit2: So they started to accost some random dude that's just standing there, accusing him of being a traitor for not shaking someone's hand. Hilarious, while they tell that guy to hit the road, you hear some asshat with a megaphone in the background yelling about how no one can tell them to leave, cause they are patriots exerting their rights. How long till they fence themselves off in some city and start a shitty gardening project in a park, like CHAZ?

Edit3: Fuck me, dude just yelled "This is PAZ - Patriots Autonomous Zone", that stream couldn't fuck with me harder if it tried.
 
Last edited:
Soooo

Aside from the absolute sperging being done by TES and TDSers, I wanna talk about Kamala Harris not stepping down as a senator yet.

I realize there is a good amount of time until she is due to be sworn in, but traditionally I believe most VPs/Predident elects would have stepped down by now. Interestingly enough, the governor gets to hand pick her replacement.

Which comes off as stupid... i feel like if the Georgia run off election can happen,, there isn't too much of an excuse for not doing a quick one for her replacement. I'm not ignorant to the fact that we all know they would elect a Democrat to replace her, I just prefer an elective process over appointments if the original position was filled via an election.

But back to my original point.... what would be the logical/strategic reasoning for her dragging her feet to relinquish her current office? What does she gain by keeping it, that I am clearly missing.
There is a conflict between Black and Hispanics right now, and Newsom is trying to decide which one he cares less about pissing off with Kamala’s successor. They’ll only serve to the end of her term/next election year anyway.
 
I haven't said anything about voter fraud for days, after the texas lawsuit was thrown out I made sporadic appearances on the thread because it's ogre. Considering you're a libtard you shouldn't be using ableist language, gimmick posting as hulk Hogan or be on the farms. There's a difference between knowing a wrong and confusing numbers and spreged out anytime someone told you it was a 3. You fought on the 3 being a 1 for like 4 pages until smarty pants btfoed you. I may be "autstic" but I never confuse a 3 being a 1 and spreged about it for multiple pages.
Well, as someone without crippling autism (just enough autism to be on KF), let me explain to you that if someone admits they're wrong, you don't be a dick about it because it takes strength to admit one is wrong. Especially when, in less than a month, that person is going to be writing a post for you to post. I was going to be really nice, but not so much anymore.

Soooo

Aside from the absolute sperging being done by TES and TDSers, I wanna talk about Kamala Harris not stepping down as a senator yet.

I realize there is a good amount of time until she is due to be sworn in, but traditionally I believe most VPs/Predident elects would have stepped down by now. Interestingly enough, the governor gets to hand pick her replacement.

Which comes off as stupid... i feel like if the Georgia run off election can happen,, there isn't too much of an excuse for not doing a quick one for her replacement. I'm not ignorant to the fact that we all know they would elect a Democrat to replace her, I just prefer an elective process over appointments if the original position was filled via an election.

But back to my original point.... what would be the logical/strategic reasoning for her dragging her feet to relinquish her current office? What does she gain by keeping it, that I am clearly missing.
She won't yet because they're still voting on stuff, like the stimulus bill
 
Took them long enough. That said, couldn't most of the hacking incidents ruin any case they have against controlled opposition Fox News?
Generally speaking, events that occur after the time of an accused crime that are materially different than the accused crime do not make the accusation true. If you accuse me of deliberately killing someone on March 3rd and then I get arrested for public drunkenness on March 18th, that murder accusation doesn't magically stop being slanderous. TMK, none of these hacking incidents occurred during the times when, allegedly, the cabal of two dead Hispanic commies and one alive Chinese commie were busy super-rigging the election even more than the machines allegedly already rigged the election, and none of them compromised the voting rolls and edited them to be different.
 
Well, as someone without crippling autism (just enough autism to be on KF), let me explain to you that if someone admits they're wrong, you don't be a dick about it because it takes strength to admit one is wrong. Especially when, in less than a month, that person is going to be writing a post for you to post. I was going to be really nice, but not so much anymore.
Well you were being a dick towards smarty and other kiwis who told you it was a 3, not a 1. Oh bullshit you done the heel turn on me first, I was actually quite cordial to you until you done the first shoot on me👁👄👁.
 
Last edited:
Mob refusing to leave capital building in Oregon, livestream: https://youtu.be/R1cOrWw9msc

cops about to start gassing and mass arrests.
Same as in the UK where cops literally run away from nig nogs rioting but whip out the batons for white nationalists, I'll be completely unsurprised if there's a protestor or two shot today by the police after months and months of faggots larping as Frozen characters trying to firebomb a Portland federal building resulted in indefinite stand down orders.
 
with enough data you can prove a negative. For example, if you had the pollbook and voter roll you check and see if the number of votes don't exceed registered voters. you could look at the signatures on mail in envelopes and see if there's one signature on multiple or see if they match the voter registration.

that kind of thing.
Thanks man!

Hey, I have this fluid here that freezes at 0°C and when i put my hand in it it gets wet? Could you help me identify it and its properties?
 
Biden won't. If anything, the role of that will go to Congress, where there a lot of the progressives who'll push on that shit. And the only ones to be executed would be the ones that are defiant and refuse to go to the camps like Alex Jones. All Biden (or Harris) need to do is sign off on it after it's been spun with a good PR angle.
Still waiting on those death camps Obama was supposed to start.

No wait he was just taking over Bush Jr's, silly me how could I forget? :story:
 
Back