- Joined
- Jul 14, 2019
Soooo
Aside from the absolute sperging being done by TES and TDSers, I wanna talk about Kamala Harris not stepping down as a senator yet.
I realize there is a good amount of time until she is due to be sworn in, but traditionally I believe most VPs/Predident elects would have stepped down by now. Interestingly enough, the governor gets to hand pick her replacement.
Which comes off as stupid... i feel like if the Georgia run off election can happen,, there isn't too much of an excuse for not doing a quick one for her replacement. I'm not ignorant to the fact that we all know they would elect a Democrat to replace her, I just prefer an elective process over appointments if the original position was filled via an election.
But back to my original point.... what would be the logical/strategic reasoning for her dragging her feet to relinquish her current office? What does she gain by keeping it, that I am clearly missing.
Aside from the absolute sperging being done by TES and TDSers, I wanna talk about Kamala Harris not stepping down as a senator yet.
I realize there is a good amount of time until she is due to be sworn in, but traditionally I believe most VPs/Predident elects would have stepped down by now. Interestingly enough, the governor gets to hand pick her replacement.
Which comes off as stupid... i feel like if the Georgia run off election can happen,, there isn't too much of an excuse for not doing a quick one for her replacement. I'm not ignorant to the fact that we all know they would elect a Democrat to replace her, I just prefer an elective process over appointments if the original position was filled via an election.
But back to my original point.... what would be the logical/strategic reasoning for her dragging her feet to relinquish her current office? What does she gain by keeping it, that I am clearly missing.