Insurrection 2021

What's going to happen on January 6th?

  • TRUMP JUNTA GOVERNMENT

    Votes: 40 10.1%
  • CHICOM BIDEN ROUNDUP

    Votes: 18 4.5%
  • BOOMERS STANDING AROUND IN Q MERCH ACCOMPLISHING NOTHING

    Votes: 340 85.4%

  • Total voters
    398
  • Poll closed .
Mike the Pillow Guy finally released his "absolute proof" of election fraud video... to youtube of all places... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKaSX9SKR1A

Haven't watched it yet, curious how long before it gets taken down.




EDIT:
Ok, interesting. At 1:37:00 they are claiming to have some kind of firewall logs of China switching votes. Confused how they could have gotten firewall logs of every county in the USA.
 
Last edited:
1612550510089.png


I told you all.

Organization. It's not magic. It's hard work. It just looks like magic to those who have been trained to never, ever, organize but continue to be shocked when people one the left "conspire" or "collude" to defeat them.

Here's Time Magazine and some of the people that organized the theft of the election bragging about it. Rubbing it in your faces now that there's no way to undo it.

 
Mike the Pillow Guy finally released his "absolute proof" of election fraud video... to youtube of all places... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKaSX9SKR1A

Haven't watched it yet, curious how long before it gets taken down.


View attachment 1898447

EDIT:
Ok, interesting. At 1:37:00 they are claiming to have some kind of firewall logs of China switching votes. Confused how they could have gotten firewall logs of every county in the USA.
yeah its gone now.
 
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: dorxter¼
yeah its gone now.

Here's a shot of part of the logs of "foreign intrusion flipping votes":

vlcsnap-2021-02-05-13h14m30s667.png

And then an animated chart of it happening in "real time":

vlcsnap-2021-02-05-13h13m24s576.png


I mean, this stuff preaches real good... but not sure where this info is sourced from. Other than that, most of the video was talking data that was already made public in the lawsuits, so not really sure under what reason youtube would take it down for violating "community standards"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michael Wade
Here's a shot of part of the logs of "foreign intrusion flipping votes":

View attachment 1898661

And then an animated chart of it happening in "real time":

View attachment 1898666


I mean, this stuff preaches real good... but not sure where this info is sourced from. Other than that, most of the video was talking data that was already made public in the lawsuits, so not really sure under what reason youtube would take it down for violating "community standards"
You know why, the mask is off.

Free speech doesnt matter anymore.
 
View attachment 1898603

I told you all.

Organization. It's not magic. It's hard work. It just looks like magic to those who have been trained to never, ever, organize but continue to be shocked when people one the left "conspire" or "collude" to defeat them.

Here's Time Magazine and some of the people that organized the theft of the election bragging about it. Rubbing it in your faces now that there's no way to undo it.

Read the entire time article you retard.
 
Pillow man is smoking rocks again. What a shit show.
If someone says something that confirms what I believe, it must be true.
Read the entire time article you retard.
Won't matter. Despite the fact that most of the people bitching about mail-in voting cannot tell you how a single mail-in ballot is actually tabulated, all mail-in ballots are fraudulent and thus an entire article dedicated to explaining how this process was insured and overseen (among others) for transparency won't matter, as base-zero the dogma is that every mail-in-vote should be immediately purged (and not given an opportunity to vote again).

It also speaks in any case to an obvious truth: conservatives believe that they're above playing the political game. You guys need to lose that belief, unless you're really keen on being a regional party capable of not much beyond hemorrhaging. The Enlightened Centrists™ here would really prefer an actually capable opposition to the progressive retards.
 
If someone says something that confirms what I believe, it must be true.

Won't matter. Despite the fact that most of the people bitching about mail-in voting cannot tell you how a single mail-in ballot is actually tabulated, all mail-in ballots are fraudulent and thus an entire article dedicated to explaining how this process was insured and overseen (among others) for transparency won't matter, as base-zero the dogma is that every mail-in-vote should be immediately purged (and not given an opportunity to vote again).

It also speaks in any case to an obvious truth: conservatives believe that they're above playing the political game. You guys need to lose that belief, unless you're really keen on being a regional party capable of not much beyond hemorrhaging. The Enlightened Centrists™ here would really prefer an actually capable opposition to the progressive retards.
The real issue with mail in votes is that they're susceptible to man in the middle attacks and there's absolutely no way to detect it, so there will never be any evidence of it happening unless someone's stupid enough to confess to doing so.

That and it removes the guarantee of private voting, since you're doing it at home and members of your household can pressure you to do it infront of / with them.

Forged signatures/someone fraudulently mailing someone else's votes is technically detectible (can be found out by asking voters directly if they voted and if the signature on the envelop is theirs). But it's a lot of work so it's really never been done.
 
man in the middle
The vote scanners aren't connected to any networks, unless you're speaking colloquially rather than the network security meaning. At that point - yes, there's a way to notice. People who open the envelopes tally the votes while they're doing it. This is prone to human error of course, but it helps to detect wildly inaccurate swings in the vote totals. If you pulled out the memory sticks / security tokens necessary to upload the data to their final destination, you'd be able to notice that someone accessed the machine/pulled the sticks between pickup and dropoff.

The woman in Georgia who showed herself on the computer her adjudicating other peoples' votes for particular ballots wasn't herself sure of whether the software actually would overwrite the scanned-in votes, and the footage from Delaware county PA shows that rejected ballots are filled out on completely new ballots by two people of different party affiliations with a security guard watching - one reading, one filling it in.

With all that in mind, for someone to mess with the vote tallies either on a level that would influence elections, you would need complete cooperation among virtually everyone in an entire area to a degree that boggles the mind. And this has to be somehow more plausible than "the guy who barely won against Hillary Clinton by 80k votes failed to make significant inroads outside of his base demographic."
That and it removes the guarantee of private voting,
Using PA as an example, I know here I can look up how anyone I know voted. The situation you're describing sounds like it's either someone without a spine or in an abusive situation, and an abuser will check the records through this manner. It does lower the barrier of entry to some degree, sure, but for every person whose vote gets beaten one way, you could argue there's someone else who will cast a vote that might otherwise not have bothered.
Forged signatures/someone fraudulently mailing someone else's votes is technically detectible
It's imperfect, prone to human error, and a fairly faulty system. Depending on what state you're in, though, you already didn't need to provide any form of ID to vote (some do require proof of it). The Cobb audit found that there were a whopping two signatures that deviated largely from the totals, due to a woman signing for her husband and some idiot signing in the wrong spot. There is no doubt that some degree of fraud could have happened with the issuance of these ballots, but the burden of proof lies not on finding a single instance, but on a repeating pattern of peoples' ballots being mailed to improper addresses, actively used, and not flagged by the signature comparisons - to a degree large and wide enough to affect elections.
I'm going to guess that Pillowman doesn't really address much of this, and instead clings to the bizarre assertion that "if at least one ballot is fraudulent, then theoretically an arbitrary-enough value of them could be fraudulent, and thus we should throw them out regardless of the actual fraudulent:real ratio, so that my guy can win." I'll recommend it for bad movie night with some friends and get around to it then.
 
Any one noticed the elation on these suits faces whenever theyre on camera?
 
View attachment 1898603

I told you all.

Organization. It's not magic. It's hard work. It just looks like magic to those who have been trained to never, ever, organize but continue to be shocked when people one the left "conspire" or "collude" to defeat them.

Here's Time Magazine and some of the people that organized the theft of the election bragging about it. Rubbing it in your faces now that there's no way to undo it.


Most be hard to go through life with out having the ability to read.

So this fixing of the election is a bipartisan support to create a robust election system. How evil.
 
"Inciting violence against Trump is fine when he was literally president! He's not supposed to be protected!"
"Politicians are a protected class, normals can't march on the capitol it's literally sacred, violence is bad"

Like at least try to pretend to have consistency
 
Back