🐱 Interesting clickbait, op-eds, fluff pieces and other smaller stories

CatParty
102943266-caitlyn.530x298.jpg


http://www.cnbc.com/2015/08/24/caitlyn-jenner-halloween-costume-sparks-social-media-outrage-.html

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/ne...een-costume-labeled-817515?utm_source=twitter

It's nowhere near October, but one ensemble is already on track to be named the most controversial Halloween costume of 2015.

Social media users were out in full force on Monday criticizing several Halloween retailers for offering a Caitlyn Jenner costume reminiscent of the former-athlete's Vanity Fair cover earlier this year.

While Jenner's supporters condemned the costume as "transphobic" and "disgusting" on Twitter, Spirit Halloween, a retailer that carries the costume, defended the getup.

"At Spirit Halloween, we create a wide range of costumes that are often based upon celebrities, public figures, heroes and superheroes," said Lisa Barr, senior director of marking at Spirit Halloween. "We feel that Caitlyn Jenner is all of the above and that she should be celebrated. The Caitlyn Jenner costume reflects just that."
 
A similar incident happened earlier at an Arby's. It's mentioned in the OP.

Two similar incidents is a bit worrying, but I wouldn't say it's a trend just yet. Hopefully it'll stay to just these two, but knowing the herd mentality of these people, I wouldn't be surprised if we see more of this in the near future.
Not to mention all the copycats who will think this is a brilliant idea.
 
The cause seems to be holding the cops in your town accountable for the cops in another city's bad behavior, which is irrational, self-defeating and guaranteed to cause problems between you and your town's cops where their wasn't any before.

My sympathy is with pissed off people who've had it with the occasional power-tripping cop, but it ends the moment they take that out on the next person they find wearing a badge
 
My sympathy is with pissed off people who've had it with the occasional power-tripping cop, but it ends the moment they take that out on the next person they find wearing a badge

I dunno, it's always the police line that any problems with their behaviour are down to the individual qualities of the misbehaving cops, not to any problems with police culture as a whole. I am suspicious that the police line is objectively correct. It's also doubtless wrong that every cop is a personally bad individual but you wouldn't have to believe that to have problems with police officers as a group, any more than a racist has to believe in the low moral character of literally every single black person.
 
You know Russia was once called godless.

It's funny that they now refer to it as "godly" just because they have a hard on for persecuting homosexuals.

To be fair there have been some fairly major changes in Russia between those two descriptions.

In Bush 2's day, it was when he signed the the Defense budget for 2006 that the left-leaning side of the web swore that this was the first step towards a military dictatoriship with Bush at the head.

If only it was that recent! People believed Thomas Jefferson was going to rule as a Robespierre-esque ultramajoritarian.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuskEngine
Anna, is that you?

Because comparing
If he wasn't autistic I bet literally none of you would give a crap. Also can we please have one news thread that mentions an autistic person that doesn't turn into a bunch of retarded A-logging? I swear to God you guys are more autistic than the people mentioned in these articles.
(Incoming dumb and autistic ratings. Oh well.)

Spot on.

If the abuser's son were not autistic, they'd be spewing a different tune.

But since the son was an autist (and his mother had mental issues, too), they think it's funny to act like total cunts about this.
 
I see the point you're trying to make but cops (in America anyway) aren't legally required to protect anyone from harm.

Actually preventing crimes is a secondary purpose at most for normal police. Generally, police act after the fact to investigate and enable prosecution of crimes already committed.
 
I won't say I like the police and the direction they're going, but common sense says to treat them with a modicum of respect. They're not the enemy.

I know several cops well and most of them are decent people. I also know a few that are complete assholes. As long as you're not a fucking moron, cops are pretty easy to get along with. Treat them like people and they tend to do the same.

I'll admit it may be different in cities though, that could get impersonal.
 
I dunno, it's always the police line that any problems with their behaviour are down to the individual qualities of the misbehaving cops, not to any problems with police culture as a whole.


But refusing service to cops doesn't do anything to address that and only furthers the divide between the police and civilian populace. I mean there are places where talking about police culture and drawing attention to it can make a positive difference but this is just likely to make any officer who is denied service feel alienated from the community they're policing, which doesn't bode well.
 
But refusing service to cops doesn't do anything to address that and only furthers the divide between the police and civilian populace. I mean there are places where talking about police culture and drawing attention to it can make a positive difference but this is just likely to make any officer who is denied service feel alienated from the community they're policing, which doesn't bode well.

I haven't heard of any real businesses doing this recently. Just a couple dumbfucks like the Whataburger guy, who was immediately fired, and that idiotic anarchist coffee shop that went out of business because John Langley is incompetent and their coffee was shitty.
 
But refusing service to cops doesn't do anything to address that and only furthers the divide between the police and civilian populace. I mean there are places where talking about police culture and drawing attention to it can make a positive difference but this is just likely to make any officer who is denied service feel alienated from the community they're policing, which doesn't bode well.

No, but if there is somebody who is genuinely uncomfortable around cops, I think that's something that people need to respect, and I think given how much crazy shit cops are doing, I think we should give somebody the benefit of the doubt if they claim to be uncomfortable. I know fast food jobs aren't supposed to be great fun but nobody should be required to do work that is genuinely traumatising, and I'd rather err on the side of a few cops having to go down the block for coffee to a few people being fired for not serving them. And yes I know the law doesn't reflect my views, but I'm arguing for what's moral, not what's legal.

With anarchist cafes excluding cops, it's really a rational business decision to promote their brand, either directly or indirectly, so I totally endorse it and would expect anybody who cares about the rights of small businesses (LOL) to do the same thing.
 
If we're comparing globally, Russians are fairly religious, comparable to Americans, generally more religious than most other European countries (honorable exception for Poland obviously). The big difference that an American dominionist might approve of, aside from the whole hatin'-dem-gays thing, is that Russia has no separation of Church and State - the Russian Orthodox Church is explicitly protected by the Russian government and the state's duty to preserve and maintain Orthodoxy is written into the constitution.

This is one of the best indicators that, despite what lazy op-ed columnists might say, Putin is not just resurrecting the Soviet Union wholesale - he's fashioning a new autocracy that draws from some aspects of Soviet totalitarianism (mostly its military successes) but draws, I would argue, equally heavily on the cultural and political legacy of Imperial Russia, with the Orthodox Church playing a major part of that.
 
No, but if there is somebody who is genuinely uncomfortable around cops, I think that's something that people need to respect, and I think given how much crazy shit cops are doing, I think we should give somebody the benefit of the doubt if they claim to be uncomfortable.

I think we disagree on whether denying them service is something that's done primarily out of discomfort, or as a deliberate act of exclusion. I don't find the latter to be productive at all.
 
Back