ITT We argue about how fatties get fat, why they stay fat, and what they should do instead - It's a mystery! It's an obesity sperging containment thread!

I don't have a TV, amigo, and I've not eaten fast food- even on road trips- since I started feeding myself. That's WHY I was curious. Something about the ad pipeline isn't reaching me in particular, so I want to know where that break is specifically.

Well, there it is. I'm in a similar position. No TV, aggressive adblock, and I live in a well-laid out urban area with no food deserts. When you look at places hardest hit by obesity, it's suburban or rural areas where there's little to no resources, recreation, or food options. Or it's urban areas in food deserts. Income also plays a big role, for a myriad of factors. But I'd say in the cases of chantal and amber reid, shitty food is one of a few entertainments they can afford. That's why you see a reduction in childhood obesity when you introduce kids to recreational activities. Food can and should be a form of entertainment, but it should be one of many. For a lot of people, it's one of a handful.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: NoReturn
No TV, aggressive adblock
Ah ha. Here's what we've got in common. I totally feel you on the food desert thing, that part totally checks out, but it was the part about "Why would you do it if you have access to better food. What's so appealing?" that was getting to me.
 
I'll say this much: It's hard to not eat this shit all the time. It's constantly in our faces, and the large fast food corporations hire psychologists, nutritionists, and marketing experts to make their food as tantalizing and habit-forming as possible. You don't even notice how much it saturates our society until you go somewhere it doesn't. When I traveled in [somewhere not america] I noticed that there weren't ads every five seconds for tacobellmcdonaldsburgerkingwhatever. And I didn't see any of them, either. Coming back to the states was wild.
it's literally NOT hard, though. only deathfats with fucked up food relationships have trouble regulating their intake.
 
it's literally NOT hard, though. only deathfats with fucked up food relationships have trouble regulating their intake.

it clearly is hard, given that obesity is one of the most common health complications in the western world. you can jerk yourself off over how much "better" you are, but that won't change the science.

Ah ha. Here's what we've got in common. I totally feel you on the food desert thing, that part totally checks out, but it was the part about "Why would you do it if you have access to better food. What's so appealing?" that was getting to me.

Yeah I mean deathfats and obesity in general are less common in demographics with higher incomes. In my moments of weakness I'd have a taco bell "feast" but only because I'm a poorfag. If I had money I'd have a poke feast instead, with half the calories as a result.

Not to mention that as I edited into my post after you quoted it because im slowpoke, food is a form of entertainment. When you have more money, you can afford more entertainment, and a wider variety of entertainment.
 
it's literally NOT hard, though. only deathfats with fucked up food relationships have trouble regulating their intake.

I think a bigger problem honestly are North American portion sizes.

If you’ve ever been in North America (or are an American/Canadian who’s been abroad) you’ll realize that they’re fucking huuuge.

Burgers are bigger (well, a Big Mac is a Big Mac, but you got double Big Macs and double quarter pounders that don’t exist elsewhere.) the fries are bigger, the drinks are bigger.

And it’s not just fast food, but also regular restaurants.

If you want to fix obesity, portion sizes would be a good place to start.


fucking terrifying. she's always been fat but she still looked like a person. in three years she's turned into an actual blob.

Shit is crazy. She’s in her thirties and needs a walker! You’d think that was a hint that she should quit stuffing her face.
 
Last edited:
I think a bigger problem honestly are North American portion sizes.

If you’ve ever been in North America (or are an American/Canadian who’s been abroad) you’ll realize that they’re fucking huuuge.

Burgers are bigger (well, a Big Mac is a Big Mac, but you got double Big Macs and double quarter pounders that don’t exist elsewhere.) the fries are bigger, the drinks are bigger.

And it’s not just fast food, but also regular restaurants.

If you want to fix obesity, portion sizes would be a good place to start.




Shit is crazy. She’s in her thirties and needs a walker! You’d think that was a hint that she should quit stuffing her face.

It's not about portion sizes, really. The prevalence of obesity is a multifaceted issue that's largely socioeconomic in nature. The portion sizes are a result, not a cause.

The walker is atrocious. I don't know how she isn't deeply ashamed of being seen using it in public.
 
My knowledge of deathfats is limited to this site (so please correct me if I’m wrong) but underneath all that blubber she must be pretty strong already? I mean, you can’t hoist around all that weight day after day without having developed some musculature - or am I completely off?

I always assumed that explained the cockroach immortality of the mobile fatties, that underneath it they have the strength of 10 men. Bed bound fatties, nope but the mobile ones must surely be flexing, if only we could see it?

Show me one over the age of 45. Show me a living 55 year old deathfat.
Their average lifespan is 30. The fat encapsulates their internal organs, their heart can't take the strain, and diabetes ravages their entire circulatory system.
When they die (young) we always have to autopsy, they're always in that age range. (Any sudden death of a non hospitalized/no hospice person under 40). It's the worst part of the job, and I've worked on bloated, two-week-decayed drowning victims. These people are worse.
Then they have to be sectioned to get cremated.
Dismembered, basically. Burned a chunk at a time.

*shudder*
"I DON'T WANT TO GET BACK INTO DATING!"
Bold of her to assume she has a choice.
I mean, who wouldn't want to snuggle up with this at night?
View attachment 1488380
"Calm down, it's legal!" Where have we heard that before?
[/SPOILER]
Holy Christ I thought she was naked for a second. Fuck that.
 
This is absolutely not true. Crematories do not dismember people. She would be refused cremation, pure and simple. Deathfatties get buried.
oh, we do it. it depends where you go.
she's Canadian though so it may differ. places I've worked will definitely section and cremate, family has to consent to the chunkening though.
 
oh, we do it. it depends where you go.
she's Canadian though so it may differ. places I've worked will definitely section and cremate, family has to consent to the chunkening though.

You have not worked in a crematory that dismembers people. It does not happen.

This is what happens.
 
Last edited:
You have not worked in a crematory that dismembers people. It does not happen.
Glad you haven't. There are some unpleasant places in the US. Keep in mind as well- I've been in this field for almost 20 years. (standards do change)

Given all that gorge I'm wondering how she's feeling right now. I know she likely can't feel her feet, but she's got to be hung over from the carb load.
 
Glad you haven't. There are some unpleasant places in the US. Keep in mind as well- I've been in this field for almost 20 years. (standards do change)

Given all that gorge I'm wondering how she's feeling right now. I know she likely can't feel her feet, but she's got to be hung over from the carb load.

Sorry, here to 2nd this, you absolutely are full of insane amounts of shit. Crematories do not dismember decedents and even the most creative restoration professionals do not desecrate corpses. Additionally, the funeral industry is dominated by about 3 major firms, where there are extreme legal incentives to not break the law. Sheisty business practices? Sure. Corpse desecration? Maybe if you are personally doing it.
 
Show me one over the age of 45. Show me a living 55 year old deathfat.
Their average lifespan is 30. The fat encapsulates their internal organs, their heart can't take the strain, and diabetes ravages their entire circulatory system.
I get what you're saying, but there are certainly deathfats that live to see their 50's. There isn't a list of all deathfats in the states, but you can see this just by looking at M600PL.
I don't know exactly what we're defining as a deathfat either, but if we're considering peoples in their 400s, than there are plenty of 400 lb 40 and 50 year olds getting WLS.

Again, I get what you're saying and no one is arguing that being super morbidly obese cuts decades off you life, just maybe you fell victim to a bit of hyperbole :)

Allen.png

Renee.png

Janie.png

Diane.png

Pauline.png
 
I get what you're saying, but there are certainly deathfats that live to see their 50's. There isn't a list of all deathfats in the states, but you can see this just by looking at M600PL.
I don't know exactly what we're defining as a deathfat either, but if we're considering peoples in their 400s, than there are plenty of 400 lb 40 and 50 year olds getting WLS.

Again, I get what you're saying and no one is arguing that being super morbidly obese cuts decades off you life, just maybe you fell victim to a bit of hyperbole :)

The reason you don't see super morbidly obese people over the age of about 50 (unless you're a health care provider) is because virtually all of them are either house-/bedbound, or in a care facility by then. They can't even get out of the house on a scootypuff with a lift-assisted van, they're so far gone. They may not be dead yet, but they're in the waiting room.

And if you see anybody over 65 who is that huge and still living, it's because they didn't get that big until relatively late in life. They had decades of being no more than overweight behind them, and didn't start gaining weight in earnest until their 40s or older.

I can think of one man I knew who only started gaining huge amounts of weight after retiring from farming at around age 65. He'd always been a big eater, but doing farm labor burned most of it off. He was about 6'3", very muscular, and 200-225lbs during his prime working years, but in his 50s started gaining weight as he slowed down. He probably weighed 300lbs when he retired (which was fucking huge, back then).

Once he stopped working, however, he kept eating as he always had, gained weight rapidly, and refused to change his accustomed eating habits even as his health fell apart. He died slowly of heart failure following a massive heart attack at age 78, weighing around 450-500lbs, after being completely housebound for the last five years of his life (this was in the '70s, and bariatric wheelchairs, scootypuffs, and motorized vehicle lifts were nonexistent).

Age 78 is fucking ancient for a deathfatty, but he only was one for the last 12-15 years of his life (if you can consider the torturous final five years "life"). Had he been hauling around 300+ lbs since his teens or early 20s, he would not have lived anywhere near as long as he did.

Today, we've got a population that is far fatter than their ancestors at a much younger age. Grandma may have let herself go and surpassed 200lbs in her late 40s, as menopause kicked in, but her granddaughter weighed 200lbs by the time she entered high school. Grandma may have developed type 2 diabetes in her mid-60s (which used to be the expected age for it), but her granddaughter will develop it in her 30s--and maybe even earlier. Grandma still has a good chance to live to 80 with both feet intact, even if she doesn't lose weight and relies on insulin to do most of the heavy lifting in controlling her BG, but her granddaughter will be lucky to make it to 55.

And this is despite increased bariatric accommodations/equipment, and increased ability by healthcare providers to shore up fatties' failing health and keep them alive. Getting fat when you're old is bad, but getting fat when you're young (and staying that way) is a fucking disaster.

Chantal has always been fat; there has never been a time in her life when she wasn't (though she was less fat after that teen group home experience, she gained it all right back, and has kept gaining). So she's falling apart right on schedule.
 
The reason you don't see super morbidly obese people over the age of about 50 (unless you're a health care provider) is because virtually all of them are either house-/bedbound, or in a care facility by then. They can't even get out of the house on a scootypuff with a lift-assisted van, they're so far gone. They may not be dead yet, but they're in the waiting room.

And if you see anybody over 65 who is that huge and still living, it's because they didn't get that big until relatively late in life. They had decades of being no more than overweight behind them, and didn't start gaining weight in earnest until their 40s or older.

I can think of one man I knew who only started gaining huge amounts of weight after retiring from farming at around age 65. He'd always been a big eater, but doing farm labor burned most of it off. He was about 6'3", very muscular, and 200-225lbs during his prime working years, but in his 50s started gaining weight as he slowed down. He probably weighed 300lbs when he retired (which was fucking huge, back then).

Once he stopped working, however, he kept eating as he always had, gained weight rapidly, and refused to change his accustomed eating habits even as his health fell apart. He died slowly of heart failure following a massive heart attack at age 78, weighing around 450-500lbs, after being completely housebound for the last five years of his life (this was in the '70s, and bariatric wheelchairs, scootypuffs, and motorized vehicle lifts were nonexistent).

Age 78 is fucking ancient for a deathfatty, but he only was one for the last 12-15 years of his life (if you can consider the torturous final five years "life"). Had he been hauling around 300+ lbs since his teens or early 20s, he would not have lived anywhere near as long as he did.

Today, we've got a population that is far fatter than their ancestors at a much younger age. Grandma may have let herself go and surpassed 200lbs in her late 40s, as menopause kicked in, but her granddaughter weighed 200lbs by the time she entered high school. Grandma may have developed type 2 diabetes in her mid-60s (which used to be the expected age for it), but her granddaughter will develop it in her 30s--and maybe even earlier. Grandma still has a good chance to live to 80 with both feet intact, even if she doesn't lose weight and relies on insulin to do most of the heavy lifting in controlling her BG, but her granddaughter will be lucky to make it to 55.

And this is despite increased bariatric accommodations/equipment, and increased ability by healthcare providers to shore up fatties' failing health and keep them alive. Getting fat when you're old is bad, but getting fat when you're young (and staying that way) is a fucking disaster.

Chantal has always been fat; there has never been a time in her life when she wasn't (though she was less fat after that teen group home experience, she gained it all right back, and has kept gaining). So she's falling apart right on schedule.
I agree with everything you've said. There isn't a statistically proven "average age" for the super morbidly obese, but everyone agrees that it takes many years off your life. I was only suggesting that the previous poster was being hyperbolic claiming that these people live an average of 35 years (it's probably more like 55 to 60) or that you'd be hard pressed to find a super morbidly obese (let's say 400 pound) 55 year old.

And agree with you're "young fat people now-a-days" rant too
 
Jeezus, we have the makings of bona fide revolution in the streets, and these fat, useless, proletariat (in the Roman sense, not Marxist sense) loads think they are Che Guevara just for waking up in the morning and not hating themselves?

Here's another thought, fatties: just waking up in the morning is one more day you didn't manage to kill yourselves with gluttony.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. The "love yourself" philosophy, an outgrowth of hippie dippy bullshit of the 1960's, has ruined this culture more than anything. Not only is lack of any achievement praiseworthy, those who don't praise you for doing absolutely nothing are bigoted. Self love leads to solipsism and dissipation; a pox on the Boomers for this one.

Once upon a time, such self love was seen as immodest and self-centered. Being humble was seen as virtuous. If Chantal were to actually hate herself and hate what she does, it would represent a first step toward realizing a better future. Her little moments of semi-clarity are the closest she comes, and they are scare her into considering how damaged she is and force her to make attempts at breaking the cycle. But then she is busy loving herself again, and nothing says love like pizza and poutine. And here we are looking at the same mindless memes we have seen a hundred times, knowing that they will lead absolutely nowhere.

If one of these fattards ever actually lost weight, maybe I'd be willing to entertain the conceit that it is "revolutionary". Until then, self love is really just a more delusional form of necrophilia.

Imagine if the biggest thing in your life was worrying about what people think about 400 pound losers. Think of all the thoughts you'd have to exclude to make that your primary concern in life.

These fatsos better wise up. If this is a revolution, or even a prolonged disruption of society like a great depression, very few deathfatties will survive. A few might lose some weight before they croak, though.
more like act of delusion. i don't think it's fair to call it self love tbh. self love is just the term they use to hide their inability to improve themselves. no one who actually loves themselves would let themselves get that fat. people who actually love themselves stay healthy and actively work to improve their lives.
 
I need to address the dissection issue really briefly. it's not desecration, and it's definitely not done in a funeral home, where family are involved and planning a cremation and all that. I've seen it mostly in unclaimed, unpaid hospital deaths, and in rural areas for bodies that are unclaimed from the ME's office.

There's nothing unkind or improper about doing it, it's frowned on, families being involved usually means it's not brought up (those bodies are then shipped to the nearest XL crematory, there are a few in each region of the US), but it's not illegal nor terrible. It's body disposal, and the workers doing this are dispassionate about it.

The only time bodies are treated in sections for cremation is if they're unclaimed and need to go into Potter's field.

I said this about Chantal, because I don't think her family is likely to claim her and pay that kind of bill. Maybe they would be though- they're financing all the rest.

and yes- my age sperg was hyperbole, but based in fact. It's not "morbid" obesity because it's healthy.
 
It's not about portion sizes, really. The prevalence of obesity is a multifaceted issue that's largely socioeconomic in nature. The portion sizes are a result, not a cause.

The walker is atrocious. I don't know how she isn't deeply ashamed of being seen using it in public.
I can see where you’re coming from with the socioeconomic issues. I just don’t understand it. It is way cheaper and healthier to prepare meals than eat fast food. Maybe it’s where I live, or the fact I was raised dirt poor, or that people just don’t know how to buy and prepare food, idk, but I can prepare a dozen relatively healthy meals for $30-$40.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: NoReturn
I can see where you’re coming from with the socioeconomic issues. I just don’t understand it. It is way cheaper and healthier to prepare meals than eat fast food. Maybe it’s where I live, or the fact I was raised dirt poor, or that people just don’t know how to buy and prepare food, idk, but I can prepare a dozen relatively healthy meals for $30-$40.

From having lived with a wide variety of people from various social groups, I dare say that quite a large part of the population (under 40) in the western world - though this will probably differ markedly by country/culture - is not capable of producing a variety of decent meals on a regular basis for themselves. This seems to be case both for the affluent and the less fortunate. However, an architect can afford to go to his favorite italian for a nice supper on a daily basis, while the part-time cashier is more likely to open up a tin, put some frozen goods in the oven or visit a McDonalds.
Once you reach a particularly low budget however, I find that people are more likely to be able to prepare cheap foods (beans, lentils, cheap veggies and various basic baked goods) quite well and historically, many a great culinary dish has come from the inventiveness that poverty demands.
 
Last edited:
From having lived with a wide variety of people from various social groups, I dare say that quite a large part of the population (under 40) in the western world - though this will probably differ markedly by country/culture - is not capable of producing a variety of decent meals on a regular basis for themselves. This seems to be case both for the affluent and the less fortunate. However, an architect can afford to go to his favorite italian for a nice supper on a daily basis, while the part-time cashier is more likely to open up a tin, put some frozen goods in the oven or visit a McDonalds.
Once you reach a particularly low budget however, I find that people are more likely to be able to prepare cheap foods (beans, lentils, cheap veggies and various basic baked goods) quite well and historically, many a great culinary dish has come from the inventiveness that poverty demands.
I agree. I sometimes forget that most people weren’t raised as pragmatically as I was. Honestly I think the ability to prepare meals has become lost in the cloud of convenience food.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoReturn
Back