Jacob Stuart Harrison Storytelling Thread - FSTDT Forums Ex-Pet Lolcow

  • Thread starter Thread starter MW 590
  • Start date Start date
Jacob Harrison said:
Is anyone here good at animation? If so, then will you agree to animate the scripts my video ideas for the alternate universe connection of the Star Wars Universes, Star Trek, Lord of the Rings, Super Mario, and Catholicism. I plan for many animated YouTube videos about it. I’m not that good at animation and through teamwork, me doing the scripts and someone doing the animation, the videos will be done faster.
Click to expand...
Can you please stop being a troll. Thank you.
 
Jacob Harrison said:
Oliver Cromwell was a Puritan fanatic who enacted tyrannical Puritanical laws and committed genocide against the Irish Catholics in Wexford and Drogheda and send Irish children to the West Indies as slaves. He was England’s worst ruler.

https://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/stuart-england/life-in-england-under-oliver-cromwell/
Click to expand...

Even a cursory glance at that 'history' site is enough for a non-academic to deduce it is unsourced bullshit. OP is not a scholar, OP is a shitty troll.
 
Buster O'Keefe said:
Even a cursory glance at that 'history' site is enough for a non-academic to deduce it is unsourced bullshit. OP is not a scholar, OP is a shitty troll.
Click to expand...
These facts are widely accepted by historians. The worst tyrannical law the fucking Puritans in England made was the banning of Christmas. They were the precursors to the ACLU's war on Christmas today. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christmas_controversies#Puritan_era

Cromwell's atrocities in Ireland are also widely accepted by historians. The Irish still hate him today. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cromwellian_conquest_of_Ireland#Historical_debate
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Buster O'Keefe
Jacob Harrison said:
They were the precursors to the ACLU's war on Christmas toda
Click to expand...
The ACLU isn't waging a war on Christmas. Stores say happy holidays of their own volition. And even if they said merry christmas, the ACLU couldn't do anything if it wanted to. Private companies can say whatever they want.
 
DrJonesHat said:
The ACLU isn't waging a war on Christmas. Stores say happy holidays of their own volition. And even if they said merry christmas, the ACLU couldn't do anything if it wanted to. Private companies can say whatever they want.
Click to expand...
The ACLU sues towns that have nativity scenes and crosses in public squares. And it is not just the ACLU that is waging war on Christmas. The fact that stores say happy holidays instead of merry Christmas shows the horrible political correctness that liberals promote.
 
Jacob Harrison said:
The ACLU sues towns that have nativity scenes and crosses in public squares. And it is not just the ACLU that is waging war on Christmas. The fact that stores say happy holidays instead of merry Christmas shows the horrible political correctness that liberals promote.
Click to expand...
Yes, it's illegal for governments to promote religion.
 
DrJonesHat said:
Yes, it's illegal for governments to promote religion.
Click to expand...
The ACLU only makes it illegal by their flawed interpretation of the Constitution. The First Amendment in fact should protect the right to have crosses and nativity scenes because that is their free exercise of religion.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: KimCoppolaAficionado
Jacob Harrison said:
The ACLU only makes it illegal by their flawed interpretation of the Constitution. The First Amendment in fact should protect the right to have crosses and nativity scenes because that is their free exercise of religion.
Click to expand...
The government doesn't have freedom of religion. If the town mayor wants to put up a cross in his front yard, he can, because it's his property. The government has to be neutral towards religion. Putting up a cross on public land isn't being neutral.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: KimCoppolaAficionado
DrJonesHat said:
The government doesn't have freedom of religion. If the town mayor wants to put up a cross in his front yard, he can, because it's his property. The government has to be neutral towards religion. Putting up a cross on public land isn't being neutral.
Click to expand...
That was not the original intent of the First Amendment. The original intent was that the US could not establish an official national religion or violate people's religious freedom. Back then, states still had anti blasphemy laws showing that the framers did not have forbidding the government from promoting religion whatsoever in mind.

It is similar to how the Supreme Court used a false interpretation of the 14th amendment to legalize sodomite false marriages despite the fact that it wasn't the original intent of the 14th amendment.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Dumb
Reactions: KimCoppolaAficionado
Jacob Harrison said:
That was not the original intent of the First Amendment. The original intent was that the US could not establish an official national religion or violate people's religious freedom. Back then, states still had anti blasphemy laws showing that the framers did not have forbidding the government from promoting religion whatsoever in mind.

It is similar to how the Supreme Court used a false interpretation of the 14th amendment to legalize sodomite false marriages despite the fact that it wasn't the original intent of the 14th amendment.
Click to expand...
I love you man but the supremacy clause makes all of that invalid
 
  • Agree
Reactions: KimCoppolaAficionado
The First Amendment didn't really apply to the states until the 14th Amendment was ratified and applied the Bill of Rights to the states via the incorporation doctrine through the privileges and immunities clause. That's why states had official churches and anti-blasphemy laws.
 
DrJonesHat said:
The First Amendment didn't really apply to the states until the 14th Amendment was ratified and applied the Bill of Rights to the states via the incorporation doctrine through the privaleges and immunities clause. That's why states had official churches and anti-blasphemy laws.
Click to expand...
Fair point, but Christian symbols in public places does not mean that the government established Christianity as the official religion of the town, because it is not stopping people of other religions from putting their own religious symbol on display.
 
Jacob Harrison said:
Fair point, but Christian symbols in public places does not mean that the government established Christianity as the official religion of the town, because it is not stopping people of other religions from putting their own religious symbol on display.
Click to expand...
The problem is that towns do precisely that when other religions try to put up a display. In Texas they just stopped allowing displays altogether rather than let a humanist group put up a Bill of Rights display. Ironic, no?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FierceBrosnan
  • Winner
Reactions: KimCoppolaAficionado, Francis E. Dec Esc. and Dildo
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back