James Cameron's Avatar to get four sequels - The message will still be the same

[Drag-on Knight 91873]

Maybe imprinting the cloned memories in an alien brain creates an unstable psychosis mind or something. Good for evil dehumanized villain, bad for the viewpoint hero that the audience is supposed to empathize with.

So Zombie Evil Colonel comes back to life as the N'avi terminator? I mean, people like the villain Terminator more than Kyle Reese and it would subvert the first movie's expectations just like T2 did.

 

[Kiwisee]

Judging by the Quaritch reveal, does that means he’s now TransNavi like Jake is?

 

[Raging Capybara]

Cameron is butt mad because he knows the third film, that's already completed, is going to be a trimmed-down version with a post-production budget cut in half that will be released straight to Disney plus.

Quite sad for a filmmaker like him to end up in the direct-to-video territory.

 

[74164978231]

I read somewhere that the plot contrivance to bring back the Colonel is that they scanned and backed up a copy of his brain prior to death and then imprinted it into an avatar body. So get ready to see Stephen Lang in blueface.

Which is utterly idiotic as it makes his death in 1 meaningless and leads to questions like this which completely invalidate the whole reason behind the first story;

So how come they didn’t do that with original protagonist’s brother? The guy that died and they had to bring in his wheelchair brother to replace him or whatever

 

[Fluoxetine Man]

Wait, WHAT?!
View attachment 4001487

Man literally too angry to die.

 

[Raging Capybara]

Somehow the new film is even more bland and inconsequential than the first one.

 

[LightDragonman1]

Really, this is definitely a movie to see on the big screen, but after it leaves, not so much.

Even so, I'll probably still go see it. Hey, if it is at least a fun popcorn flick like the first, then that'll do.

 

[Johan Schmidt]

Really, this is definitely a movie to see on the big screen, but after it leaves, not so much.

Even so, I'll probably still go see it. Hey, if it is at least a fun popcorn flick like the first, then that'll do.

Yeah, it'll be forgettable trash. But watching vaguely near future military stuff pound aliens into goo like it's space vietnam was a pretty good time in the first film.

 

[ZehnBoat]

Somehow the new film is even more bland and inconsequential than the first one.

View attachment 4020252

everyone will rave about it for a month, and in a year people will forget it exists

 

[BrunoMattei]

everyone will rave about it for a month, and in a year people will forget it exists

I read that too quickly and thought you said "In a year we'll forget people exist."

 

[wtfNeedSignUp]

Somehow the new film is even more bland and inconsequential than the first one.

View attachment 4020252

3 hours! For something that has even worse plot than the first? Holy shit.

And considering the VFX and the length, the fuckers needed to cut down a forest for the energy required to compile this bastard.

 

[LightDragonman1]

On the note that the plot is worse, that's actually only a few peoples opinions. Other pre-reviews I've seen claim that it is much better written than the first, even by people who didn't care much for the first, with some even saying that the visuals are more in service of the characters this time around.



Guess I'll just have to see for myself.

 

[Halmaz]

Quite sad for a filmmaker like him to end up in the direct-to-video territory.

No, the faggot deserves it.
I hope Avatar 2 underperforms and makes Jimmy buttmad. His ego needs to be taken down a notch.

 

[LightDragonman1]

Welp, like I said, we'll just have to wait see what the end result is, if it ends up being surprisingly good, or an absolute trainwreck.

All I can hope for is that, at the very least, it is an entertaining popcorn flick.

 

[The Penultimate Warrior]

So it looks like exactly the same film as the first, but wetter. Mankind bad, environment good, can see why it took so long to come up with such a brave and original message. Still, it looks pretty so the critics will love it.

 

[Hazel Motes]

Reviews are pouring in; most praising the special effeccts.

 

[mlanguishi]

Reviews are pouring in; most praising the special effeccts.
View attachment 4064397

Yeah, I wasn't going to a theater to see this unless it was 90%+. You know this is a terrible movie if it's getting under that.

 

[wtfNeedSignUp]

So it looks like exactly the same film as the first, but wetter. Mankind bad, environment good, can see why it took so long to come up with such a brave and original message. Still, it looks pretty so the critics will love it.

Pretty much my entire life it's been "Reviewers know film is bad due to deep reasons while general audience only cares for explosion and tits", but it's clear nowadays that reviewers only care for eye candy and political messaging

 

[LightDragonman1]

Yeah, I wasn't going to a theater to see this unless it was 90%+. You know this is a terrible movie if it's getting under that.

Pretty much my entire life it's been "Reviewers know film is bad due to deep reasons while general audience only cares for explosion and tits", but it's clear nowadays that reviewers only care for eye candy and political messaging

I don't quite know how a film getting a favorable score in the 80% range means it'll be terrible, nor did I find the politics in the first film to be all that distracting (though they definitely got a bit too preachy), but again, that's just me.

 

[mlanguishi]

I don't quite know how a film getting a favorable score in the 80% range means it'll be terrible, nor did I find the politics in the first film to be all that distracting (though they definitely got a bit too preachy), but again, that's just me.

Cause for leftwing cuck critics to give an environmental blowjob a review of under 99% means it's shit. C'mon man.