Jim Sterling / James "Stephanie" Sterling / James Stanton/Sexton & in memoriam TotalBiscuit (John Bain) - One Gaming Lolcow Thread

[Oliver Onions]

Why is this so common?

You answered your own question:

It's like he watched a shit load of "bimbo" porn movies and based his view of women on that.

A generation totally immersed in porn every single place they look combined with an increasingly sedentary lifestyle has absolutely ruined a subset of the population who are unable to exercise basic impulse control (a problem Jim readily admits he has).

Our Dear Leader has spoken about this on MATI a few times, but people like Jim simply aren't built for a society where your every hedonistic desire can be instantly gratified; you either learn discipline or wank yourself into an early grave.

View attachment 3467970

Spot the Jim. Lots of bodybuilders would kill for those calves. Islam me all you want, if I had to fucking see it so do you.

I'm not being an asshole here: Is that a fucking downie third in from the right?

 

[Nixxit]

Jim's bodyshape on that wrestling photo' (which is in itself something) is...I don't know, is that normal ?

Like, comparing him to the guy to his left, either there's something going on with the clothes hiding his shape, or he really does look like an amorphous ball of fat. Also his mask makes it obvious his head is much smaller than the other guy's, but I'm not sure which is actually abnormal, there.

 

[Vril-Dame vom Aldebaran]

at the end they're left with no penis or tits, sloppy makeup and a much deeper hole of depression than when they "transitioned"

The hole in their crotch or chest where their manhood/womanhood used to be is representative of the hole in their soul.

Poetic, in a way.

 

[Fag Albert]

Why is jim shaped like a minion

 

[From The Uncanny Valley]

Why is jim shaped like a minion

he committed war crimes

 

[Moja Zemlja]

Jim's bodyshape on that wrestling photo' (which is in itself something) is...I don't know, is that normal ?

Like, comparing him to the guy to his left, either there's something going on with the clothes hiding his shape, or he really does look like an amorphous ball of fat. Also his mask makes it obvious his head is much smaller than the other guy's, but I'm not sure which is actually abnormal, there.

Its very normal but you don't often see people that fat wearing such form fitting clothing like that, usually its something baggy that ends up hanging down from the upper torso. Compare how he looks in that to this from a few months ago, he looks far more like a normal fat guy when he's wearing something not form fitting.

Usually he wears stuff that helps accentuate feminine features (usually his moobs) like that corset he wears nowadays or the belts he'd wear halfway up his torso, but without them he just looks like a normal fat man.

 

[Hankus McSix]

Its very normal but you don't often see people that fat wearing such form fitting clothing like that, usually its something baggy that ends up hanging down from the upper torso. Compare how he looks in that to this from a few months ago, he looks far more like a normal fat guy when he's wearing something not form fitting.
View attachment 3472593
Usually he wears stuff that helps accentuate feminine features (usually his moobs) like that corset he wears nowadays or the belts he'd wear halfway up his torso, but without them he just looks like a normal fat man.

That is absolutely uncanny. I mean he normally is but even more so.

The only difference between him and a normal fatty is tat his moobs look a bit stiffer which actually makes him look even more fat.

 

[Shotgun Badger]

View attachment 3467970

Spot the Jim. Lots of bodybuilders would kill for those calves. Islam me all you want, if I had to fucking see it so do you.

I just love it, the thing about Jim is that he has such a catastrophically bad fashion sense he can't even blend in properly with the 'real' queers who can at least wear form fitting outfits and bright colours in a way that can work, multiple people here seem to be able to pull off that garish look, especially since just having a reasonably decent figure goes a long way.

In contrast, Jim literally looks like a fat granny with a luchadore mask on.

 

[Do I Look Foolish]

If I looked as preposterous as Jim does dressed as a woman I'd avoid being in public as much as possible, never mind being filmed or photographed all the time.

 

[blablabla]

View attachment 3378423View attachment 3378425
View attachment 3378424View attachment 3378426

shave your moustache you fat retarded píg

 

[Prince Vegeta]

View attachment 3472593
Usually he wears stuff that helps accentuate feminine features (usually his moobs) like that corset he wears nowadays or the belts he'd wear halfway up his torso, but without them he just looks like a normal fat man.

I don't think he looks like a normal fat man. I've seen plenty. He is that other type. With that body shape of relatively normal looking top and somehow huge fat gut and legs. It never looks right to me. He looks like he has lipedema.

Also if you look at his shoulders you see the type of skinny fuck he was meant to be. Can you imagine the weight he puts on his joints. He is standing cross legged just to lock his joints into place.

It reminds me of this picture of an MRI scan of two women. One healthy weight and one morbidly obese. You can see the fat deposits in the brai and the compressed and awkward position of the joints and bones.

 

[I (Don't) Have A Gun]

Jim is fatter than I thought he was. Has he only lost weight on the upper upperbody somehow? Is this the drugs doing strange things?

It's probably to his advantage. Below all that fat he does have a male skeletal structure but thanks to all the fat clumped around his face it gives it a more amorphous look so its easier to pass as a fat ugly woman and not a ugly troon.

The fat and hormones gives him the same body type as Robert Paulson though...

 

[Oliver Onions]

Was just checking Jim's Graphtreon, as I'm wont to do, and I noticed that the precipitous drops always happen on the 1st of every month.

Has this been discussed before? Is this a result of how Graphtreon aggregates data, or how Patreon processes charges? Can you pledge to a Patreon for a single month without committing or do you have to manually cancel?

 

[Spud gun]

I just love it, the thing about Jim is that he has such a catastrophically bad fashion sense he can't even blend in properly with the 'real' queers

That is common with autogynephilia troons like Jim, it just adds yet another easy tell for the sane that they are just a dude with a fetish in a dress.

​

 

[ShoFuKan]

Was just checking Jim's Graphtreon, as I'm wont to do, and I noticed that the precipitous drops always happen on the 1st of every month.

Has this been discussed before? Is this a result of how Graphtreon aggregates data, or how Patreon processes charges? Can you pledge to a Patreon for a single month without committing or do you have to manually cancel?

Patreon charges the first of every month. With some creators doing weekly posts, some users can pledge, grab content till the end of the month then cancel the pledge before billed. It's why most builds and such for patreon games are restricted to higher tiers and only released after people have been billed.
Patreon then takes into account the amount of people that have cancelled their pledges and adjusts the subscriber numbers accordingly. So instead of looking for monthly sub loss with Jim, a more median line average can tell how badly he's bleeding instead.
Graphtreon is just a website that aggregates data using Patreon's API. The bad thing about it is that when users hide how much they earn or how many subs they have out of fear of ridicule, Graphtreon can't track that. So it estimates instead.

Since we're on Graphtreon, let's go over some graphs.
A basic overview of Jim's Patreon:

6.4k subs paying about $2 = about 12k a month for him. This number has more or less been consistent for the past 5 years.

When he came out as Non-Binary, he had 7.5k subs and was earning about 14k a month at his height.
This is his weekly graph-rate, the date listed, September 2020 is special because that's when he takes a dip in subs.

It was also around this time he started posting with the wig on twitter I think. That's where we see the first drop off of pledges. He had slowly gained subs through 2020 but that is what caused people to unpledge.
The spike was in May of 2021, when people in wrestling or left leaning found out about him and pledged I think. Anyway, take a note of that slow drop off in subs, 2k lost beginning in May 2021.
He's basically back to how much he was earning in 2019.

One more, total video ranking. Patreon has categories like podcasts, video commentaries, adult games, that sort of thing. What ranking does is it ranks the total number of pledges a channel has. A channel below in rank can earn more than a channel above in rank if they have more pricier subscriptions. $5 a sub as opposed to $2. You can hide per month donations and but you can't hide ranking. This is how Graphtreon estimates how much a patron earns I think, subs x min pledge. You can hide pledge numbers by turning a membership private but then you don't get ranked and good luck if anyone finds you organically.
Anyway, Jim has been in the "Video" category since he started his Patreon in 2014 and he's always been in the top 10 in pledges till about 2018 when he got bumped down to top 20.

Oh look, October 2020. He went from 14th to 28th in the space of about 4 months and sits at 36 today.

Q.E.D, Jim's patreon hasn't grown in 3 years despite coming out as Non-Binary and the dosh thrown at him by lefty loonies.

 

[Oliver Onions]

@ShoFuKan I figured the system would work something like that, so how would that be likely to apply to someone like Jim who provides no Patreon exclusive content (let's be honest, he barely provides any content at all)? In fact, actually looking at Jim's Patreon, he specifically states he has no tiers at all.

Even with your info I can't work out what's creating this pattern with Jim's gains and losses on Patreon. It looks like a whole bunch of people don't renew their subscription each month, but a small amount of new people sign up (or come back), then that process repeats, but it seems way too consistent to be natural (unless this is another of those phenomena like how true random doesn't feel random).

Graphtreon seems to scrape the figures every day and Jim doesn't hide any of his figures so this data should be pretty accurate.

 

[AngryTreeRat]

@ShoFuKan I figured the system would work something like that, so how would that be likely to apply to someone like Jim who provides no Patreon exclusive content (let's be honest, he barely provides any content at all)? In fact, actually looking at Jim's Patreon, he specifically states he has no tiers at all.
View attachment 3476746
Even with your info I can't work out what's creating this pattern with Jim's gains and losses on Patreon. It looks like a whole bunch of people don't renew their subscription each month, but a small amount of new people sign up (or come back), then that process repeats, but it seems way too consistent to be natural (unless this is another of those phenomena like how true random doesn't feel random).
View attachment 3476747
Graphtreon seems to scrape the figures every day and Jim doesn't hide any of his figures so this data should be pretty accurate.

I believe I discussed this in the past, long ago ITT, before we got a huge surge of the usual AGP haters, and randoms passing through shitting up the thread to say the same three things over and over for a bunch of pages for Jim hitting front page a few times, I did a huge post on his Patreon behaviour.

I also did a bit of analysis with his social blade for subscribers and views and narrowed down the exact day Jim went net negative. Look up my name in this thread, mobile fag currently so I'm not going to do so myself right now.

I worked out, after comparing Jim to other Patreon subscriptions, that what's happening is Jim is losing people to dead cards, bouncing withdraws, and other bank nonsense, as well as people just purging unwanted recurring payments through their bank, rather than through Patreon itself, or doing other forms of "end this at the end of the month" rather than "end this immediately" type subscription ending. This is resulting in a quirk of of all of these kicking in at once. There's also quirks of some payments being in limbo meaning for 1-3 days they are counted as "unsubscribed" by Patreon, or people not intending to unsubscribe being unsubscribed by a payment issue, receiving an email, seeing the issue, and resubscribing, creating the tiny recovery each month. I suspect a lot of people who have payment issues never notice the email, so they never resubscribe to his Patreon, even if they intended to say subscribed, which would also account for some drop off.

The echodip that happens each month is people getting pissed off at a recurring payment and unsubscribing immediately and deliberately.

Sawtooths like this are common in older Patreons, where the banking nonsense is accounting for a large amount of attrition due to the subscribers who completely forgotten about said Patreon, as it's just yet another subscription.

 

[Oliver Onions]

@AngryTreeRat That makes perfect sense now you write it all out, and now I look at the Graphtreon for a successful Patreon like Critikal's podcast it's actually got the exact same pattern, only trending upwards.

 

[teriyakiburns]

One thing I still can't get over is how much money this fat fuck earns, essentially for doing nothing. £114,000 a year, if I got all my fingers in the right order. He lives nearish Halifax, or certainly somewhere in Calderdale, where the median wage is about 29.8k a year, yethe has the gall to screech about workers rights and solidarity with people whose lives he fundamentally cannot understand. I don't care how he grew up, he's lived in the lap of luxury for long enough to become a degenerate aristocrat by comparison. I'll only believe he's all that if he starts sharing his wealth with people who actually need it, instead of blowing it all on cheap, shitty wigs, corsets, and plastic tat for his "polycule house", or whatever it is.

This is probably going to earn me top hats. Oh well. That would at least be appropriate in a TB-related thread.

 

[Mr Pancakes]

1) Can someone explain whats going on here? I dont see any mocking of ptsd if anything it sounds like they are mocking the LGBTQIA+++ shit, unless jim is trying to suggest being part of that group = mentally ill which would be a very funny self own to him and his speshul snowflake followers.

2) I've heard about living rent free in someones head but fuck for someone who apparently is trying to genocide him (no exaggeration he said this himself) he sure followers her words like a stan.

3) Considering the shit hes said in the past which included telling women they should get raped and others to kill themselves you would think he would have some humility, but you notice its always the mouthy ones who are this easily triggered kek.