Careercow Jonathan "Full" McIntosh / RadicalBytes - "Pop Culture Detective", Cucked hard by Anita Sarkeesian, King Snowflake

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Star Wars really brings out the :autism: in everyone.
deep diving.jpg

it couldn't possibly be because of all of those articles declaring "white dudebro fanboys hate The Last Jedi because they're sexist misogynist racist pissbabies -- And That's A Good Thing!", could it?

please hire me The Verge.jpg

I keep seeing this complaint about- oh, nevermind.

unironically.jpg

there's a twitter account called "Jonathan McIntosh" that's unironically like this every single day:
fishintosh.jpg

You couldn't make this stuff up.
 
it's probably worth noting that it never occurs to Rian and Jonathan that perhaps people are upset because last jedi was a mediocre movie and wasted Both Carrie and Mark in their last chance to work together.
Regardless his observations on Luke and the fan are wrong, Luke can and has killed on multiple occasions, he probably has one the highest body counts of a heroic character ever at about 2 million, Luke can and will take life when their are no other options but only then. the entire first half of return of the jedi emphases this when Luke spends 40 odd minutes indulging Jabba's bullshit and giving him chances to back down before executing the entire cartel without breaking a sweat.

During the 2nd confrontation with Vader is Luke taking a calculated risk to save a family member due to emotional investment and ignorance of how dangerous Palpatine and Vader are. The danger isnt in Luke killing an evil man in combat-luke can and has done that before without issue. the danger is him killing his own father in a rage. Without that family connection Luke would have most likely introduced the Emperor to his lightsabre without any spiritual peril.
Mackintosh's misreading is a total straw man and no one thinks like he proposes.
It also fails to justify last Jedi, where the bold, patient and kind Luke who redeemed Vader is replaced with the spineless, shallow,callous dipshit. Luke risked the legacy of the jedi to save his asshole dad in return of the jedi, wereas Luke contemplates killing his troubled nephew for dubious reasons and then tells him to go fuck himself later on despite the guy being about as conflicted as Daddy. Even if you agree with mackintosh's interpretation it's still not really the same character.

EDIT-also way to miss the point of Batman's refusal to kill.
 
Last edited:
Watching their stuff, McIntosh was the brains. Ignoring their Star Wars arguments, McIntosh's videos are better edited and cogent while Anita's is unfocused cattiness.



I don't think she's the cynical grifter that Zoe is, but she accidentally fucked her way into SJW celebrity too. She's dim and it didn't take much until she was high on her own hype. Unlike Quinn, she got rid of people useful to her. Since then, he's more successful in YouTube hits, gets a lot of Patreon money, and is less of a dramacow. All Anita gained was weight.
 
Watching their stuff, McIntosh was the brains. Ignoring their Star Wars arguments, McIntosh's videos are better edited and cogent while Anita's is unfocused cattiness.

Full McIntosh has another advantage over Anita, which is sincerity. He actually believes this bullshit.

It's funny a male feminist could only make a woman like Anita palatable to a mass audience by writing all her shit and using her as a sock puppet.
 
Mackintoshs video isnt very good and is pretty simplistic in it's analysis of the jedi (it falls apart at the 6 minute mark when he forgets that Jedi are a monastic group of warrior mystics and not a trauma support group, and saw it really wouldnt pan out with Anakin), he also presumes too much of the relationship between emotional control and masculanity. He also fails to account that the philosophy is a direct reaction to thousands of years of trial and error to a proactive supernatual evil, he also totally neglects Anakins obssession with control which ironically would feed into toxic masculinity models.
sheev.jpg


This guy really agree's with johns thoughts on being in touch with your emotions, just accept that it's how you feel and go for it.

His video is academically better than Anita's however. Although hers is way more concise, articulate and attempts to be fun. She's not particulary charismatic but johns actually difficult to listen too.


Their's a strange irony in mackintosh that he frowns upon emotional stoicism but has such dour, joyless view on life with a cold moralistic demenour.
 
Last edited:
Full McIntosh has another advantage over Anita, which is sincerity. He actually believes this bullshit.

I think it's even sadder. Anita champions the cause but she's too much off a fluffbrain to have a consistent viewpoint. McIntosh is an serious thinker, so he takes his views seriously. But Anita has no foundation for her beliefs other than grrrrlpower. OMG, Lupita is sosososo wonderful, right guys? And men will have to stay on Earth because beaming up which is Star Trekwars lol

In retrospect Sarkeesian was the pretty mouthpiece but McIntosh was the academic ideologue and Cross did the social scheming. She dumped everyone who was propping her up because she thought she was a modern Betty Friedan. That's arrogant and delusional even by the measure of other GamerGate moochers. Wu keeps Frank and Zoe exploited Alex until his family intervened. On social blade her reach is now lower than every major player I just mentioned and she will likely never understand why.

She comes off as the dumb college sorority girl who was easy to trick into sex by calling her smart and even easier to manipulate by calling her original.
 
I think it's even sadder. Anita champions the cause but she's too much off a fluffbrain to have a consistent viewpoint. McIntosh is an serious thinker, so he takes his views seriously.

That's the funny thing. McIntosh has the persuasive words, but all the charisma of a moldy doughnut. His words sound better coming from a pretty face, even if the brain behind that face is mush.

It's almost like he inadvertently proved the exact opposite of what he was trying to prove.
 
I remember looking through Anita's stuff on 4chan to find the first mention of Tropes vs Videogames came up. Seems like a lot of her early posts to /v/ are missing from various archives maybe just due to age. It was around May 2012, but I found a screenshot in another thread. This was before Anita was known to anyone outside of a handful of hardcore feminists.
sarkeesian.jpg



I remember at the time going through the posts the Anita registered to the tripcode made. She advertised on /v/ /tv/ and /cgl/ then she started posting in a Buffy the Vampire slayer thread. Then lo and behold this year.
tropes.jpg


I think it may have been Anita trying to poke the bear in the same way Zoe attempted to poke wizardchan and later during GG:
40b.jpg



Not that it matters these days, I just thought these were interesting observations.
1534519183963.jpg
 
Anita Sarkeesian is a moralistic softbrain that got lucky running a con on betas. Josh, on the other hand, seems to have some idea what he's doing but is such a fucking pasty looking downy bastard that no one really wants to pay attention to but have to because he's the only person making the product that validates their opinions.
 
I remember looking through Anita's stuff on 4chan to find the first mention of Tropes vs Videogames came up. Seems like a lot of her early posts to /v/ are missing from various archives maybe just due to age. It was around May 2012, but I found a screenshot in another thread. This was before Anita was known to anyone outside of a handful of hardcore feminists.
View attachment 521079

Anita was getting attention for a little while before the TvW shit.In particular her Kanye West and "Gendered Legos" videos had been making rounds and annoying people. The idea that it had to be her, because nobody knew who she was before then so nobody would've had a reason to fake it doesn't hold up.
 
Anita and Jonathan are a constant reminder that many of fellow graduates education never really gave them anything beyond comprehension-application level of learning and never really hit Evaluation.
 

I don't think she's the cynical grifter that Zoe is, but she accidentally fucked her way into SJW celebrity too. She's dim and it didn't take much until she was high on her own hype. Unlike Quinn, she got rid of people useful to her. Since then, he's more successful in YouTube hits, gets a lot of Patreon money, and is less of a dramacow. All Anita gained was weight.
How many views did she get from that Star Wars video?
 
Watching their stuff, McIntosh was the brains. Ignoring their Star Wars arguments, McIntosh's videos are better edited and cogent while Anita's is unfocused cattiness.



I don't think she's the cynical grifter that Zoe is, but she accidentally fucked her way into SJW celebrity too. She's dim and it didn't take much until she was high on her own hype. Unlike Quinn, she got rid of people useful to her. Since then, he's more successful in YouTube hits, gets a lot of Patreon money, and is less of a dramacow. All Anita gained was weight.
she does however have a nice ass
 
Anita was getting attention for a little while before the TvW shit.In particular her Kanye West and "Gendered Legos" videos had been making rounds and annoying people. The idea that it had to be her, because nobody knew who she was before then so nobody would've had a reason to fake it doesn't hold up.

Yeah but it seems like a lot of effort to go to. Register a tripcode under her name, then advertise her project across the site and mimic her interests for lulz? Doesn't add up. Since she wasn't that well known yet. It was only after she was almost funded it blew up. Why register a tripcode you are only using for a few days to advertise? The only reason I could think of is that she had to be identified so her asking for donations threads wouldn't be deleted.


Christopher Poole already had several connections in Silicon Valley due to the startups he got funded through investors, Canvas, and the app DrawQuest. Which both later fell through.

He's BFF at the time was Mallory Greitzer who was herself a person who often made her own startups and eventually landed herself a job at Gawker. So it can be pretty fairly assumed he ran in those circles. In 2016, he sold 4chan it to current 2chan owner Nishimura. And then ended up with the job at Google.

mal.jpg


The old alleged janitor logs during Gamergate confirms his intention to sell 4chan and how he was sympthetic to feminist causes. His instagram posts during this period also confirms he was at XOXO at the time.

1410966352011.jpg


[9/18/14 12:43 AM] moot: Cracked sent me an email a few days ago
[9/18/14 12:43 AM] moot: The same day Zoe issued her article, to be exact
[9/18/14 12:43 AM] moot: They told me they are strong supporters of the Social Justice Movement, and are through sitting behind while the harassment goes on
[9/18/14 12:44 AM] moot: They said if I didn't stop Gamergate on 4chan, they would write an article that "exposes" 4chan for the "true cesspit" it is. They're also going to basically get feminists to hack in and take down my site.
[9/18/14 12:44 AM] moot: And coincidentally, I got a letter that threatened to lynch me in the streets, from a group of hackers who strongly support feminism.
[9/18/14 12:44 AM] moot: A day before this, I went to see Anita speak at XOXO, and she was absolutely lovely. Behind the scenes, I got to have a word with her. We hit it off perfect, and we're now friends through online communication.
[9/18/14 12:44 AM] moot: I told her my situation, and her advice was to get my mods to delete everything Gamergate on site.
[9/18/14 12:44 AM] moot: I was reluctant, but after that day, I did what she said. You all remember the day I told you to delete Gamergate shit, we were convinced it would work.
[9/18/14 12:44 AM] moot: But it didn't fucking work.
[9/18/14 12:45 AM] moot: That hacker group is real btw.
[9/18/14 12:45 AM] moot: They've been sending more letters to my house, and emails to my personal address.
[9/18/14 12:45 AM] moot: Funny thing is, I still support them more than I do Gamergate.
[9/18/14 12:45 AM] moot: So, that's why I'm so worried. I got Cracked making threats and a group threatening to take down my site.
[9/18/14 12:45 AM] moot: The two are very powerful, and can get done what they say they want to get done.
[9/18/14 1:32 AM] moot: I'll have to rebuild it from the ground up, or I'll sell it to someone else.
[9/18/14 1:32 AM] [REDACTED 7]: Why would you be worried about hackers taking it down if you yourself want to take it down?
[9/18/14 1:32 AM] moot: I said sell it, not shut it down.
[9/18/14 1:33 AM] [REDACTED 7]: Either way, can you make sure to permanently ban everyone who's posted in Gamergate threads?
[9/18/14 1:33 AM] [REDACTED 4]: Yeah, if you want to rebuild 4chan, the first step is banning EVERY. SINGLE. GAMERGATE. SUPPORTER.
[9/18/14 1:33 AM] moot: It'll take a lot of work, but I'll probably do that.
[9/18/14 1:33 AM] moot: Don't know yet.


So my guess is based on the info above, is that Sarkeesian probably called in a favor with someone close (probably a mod) to moot to get a tripcode to use on 4chan for some free advertising for her project back in 2012. Since moots close friends would probably be the social justice types considering who he was hanging with.
 
Last edited:
Yeah but it seems like a lot of effort to go to. Register a tripcode under her name, then advertise her project across the site and mimic her interests for lulz? Doesn't add up. Since she wasn't that well known yet. It was only after she was almost funded it blew up. Why register a tripcode you are only using for a few days to advertise? The only reason I could think of is that she had to be identified so her asking for donations threads wouldn't be deleted.


Christopher Poole already had several connections in Silicon Valley due to the startups he got funded through investors, Canvas, and the app DrawQuest. Which both later fell through.

He's BFF at the time was Mallory Greitzer who was herself a person who often made her own startups and eventually landed herself a job at Gawker. So it can be pretty fairly assumed he ran in those circles. In 2016, he sold 4chan it to current 2chan owner Nishimura. And then ended up with the job at Google.

View attachment 522217

The old alleged janitor logs during Gamergate confirms his intention to sell 4chan and how he was sympthetic to feminist causes. His instagram posts during this period also confirms he was at XOXO at the time.

View attachment 522212

[9/18/14 12:43 AM] moot: Cracked sent me an email a few days ago
[9/18/14 12:43 AM] moot: The same day Zoe issued her article, to be exact
[9/18/14 12:43 AM] moot: They told me they are strong supporters of the Social Justice Movement, and are through sitting behind while the harassment goes on
[9/18/14 12:44 AM] moot: They said if I didn't stop Gamergate on 4chan, they would write an article that "exposes" 4chan for the "true cesspit" it is. They're also going to basically get feminists to hack in and take down my site.
[9/18/14 12:44 AM] moot: And coincidentally, I got a letter that threatened to lynch me in the streets, from a group of hackers who strongly support feminism.
[9/18/14 12:44 AM] moot: A day before this, I went to see Anita speak at XOXO, and she was absolutely lovely. Behind the scenes, I got to have a word with her. We hit it off perfect, and we're now friends through online communication.
[9/18/14 12:44 AM] moot: I told her my situation, and her advice was to get my mods to delete everything Gamergate on site.
[9/18/14 12:44 AM] moot: I was reluctant, but after that day, I did what she said. You all remember the day I told you to delete Gamergate shit, we were convinced it would work.
[9/18/14 12:44 AM] moot: But it didn't fucking work.
[9/18/14 12:45 AM] moot: That hacker group is real btw.
[9/18/14 12:45 AM] moot: They've been sending more letters to my house, and emails to my personal address.
[9/18/14 12:45 AM] moot: Funny thing is, I still support them more than I do Gamergate.
[9/18/14 12:45 AM] moot: So, that's why I'm so worried. I got Cracked making threats and a group threatening to take down my site.
[9/18/14 12:45 AM] moot: The two are very powerful, and can get done what they say they want to get done.
[9/18/14 1:32 AM] moot: I'll have to rebuild it from the ground up, or I'll sell it to someone else.
[9/18/14 1:32 AM] [REDACTED 7]: Why would you be worried about hackers taking it down if you yourself want to take it down?
[9/18/14 1:32 AM] moot: I said sell it, not shut it down.
[9/18/14 1:33 AM] [REDACTED 7]: Either way, can you make sure to permanently ban everyone who's posted in Gamergate threads?
[9/18/14 1:33 AM] [REDACTED 4]: Yeah, if you want to rebuild 4chan, the first step is banning EVERY. SINGLE. GAMERGATE. SUPPORTER.
[9/18/14 1:33 AM] moot: It'll take a lot of work, but I'll probably do that.
[9/18/14 1:33 AM] moot: Don't know yet.


So my guess is based on the info above, is that Sarkeesian probably called in a favor with someone close (probably a mod) to moot to get a tripcode to use on 4chan for some free advertising for her project back in 2012. Since moots close friends would probably be the social justice types considering who he was hanging with.
Great post, you notice that since the era of Moot 4chan has had a major reduction in bafoonery, aka no more /pol/harbor where /pol/ is intentionally ruined so the Politics Posters go and shit on the rest of the site in comedic protest.

Hiro might sell data, but damn he’s far more benevolent than Poole’s faggotry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anonymus Fluhre
Yeah but it seems like a lot of effort to go to. Register a tripcode under her name, then advertise her project across the site and mimic her interests for lulz? Doesn't add up. Since she wasn't that well known yet. It was only after she was almost funded it blew up. Why register a tripcode you are only using for a few days to advertise? The only reason I could think of is that she had to be identified so her asking for donations threads wouldn't be deleted.

Unless I'm ignorant of a particular part of 4chan history, you never registered a tripcode. It's literally just # followed by whatever string of nonsense you want, and so long as you keep it the same, that's your tripcode. Knowing that it makes it even more obvious someone was fucking around trying to rile up autists; they did it for free.
 
Unless I'm ignorant of a particular part of 4chan history, you never registered a tripcode. It's literally just # followed by whatever string of nonsense you want, and so long as you keep it the same, that's your tripcode. Knowing that it makes it even more obvious someone was fucking around trying to rile up autists; they did it for free.

No, because the responses weren't telling of hatred towards her, most showed indifference or telling her to fuck off and saging the threads in /v/. Whereas in other boards she recieved a lukewarm reception from others.
It's only after the word got out she had $150,000 that people actually attacked her.

How do I use a "tripcode"?

Tripcodes can help verify a user's identity to others, and are a type of pseudo-registration.



What is a "secure tripcode"?

A secure tripcode can be generated by placing two hash marks in the [Name] field, as opposed to one as with anormal tripcode (ex. "User##password"). Secure tripcodes use a secret key file on the server to help obscure their password. The previous example would display "User!!rEkSWzi2+mz" after being posted.
 
Last edited:
Back