Jonathan Yaniv / Jessica Yaniv / @trustednerd / trustednerd.com / JY Knows It / JY British Columbia - Canada's Best Argument Against Transgender Self-Identification

The Dec16 is Donald's restraining order / action against Yaniv, not vice versa, I think:
Smith, Donald v Yaniv, Jessica should be an indicator.

 VLC-S-S-1914076-Case-Basics.jpg
 VLC-S-S-1914076-Case-Documents.jpg
 VLC-S-S-1914076-Case-Parties.jpg
 VLC-S-S-1914076-Case-Hearings-and-Results.jpg

I recommend against anyone else paying for this information from BC: CSO until there are more developments. They gouge you, and you have a limited session to download the documents before it times out. I'll try to mirror this stuff on a separate site when I can later tonight or tomorrow.

The newest one is an action against Donald Smith. Today Yaniv tried to bring a without notice application for what is in essence a restraining order.
Please clarify what you mean by "newest one". The only one I see from Dec16 is Smith v Yaniv. Please clarify.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry, I got scolded for sharing that screenshot.

I was told it could compromise something important, but rest assured that the "end game is near". I would love to archive it, but if someone's going to jail, I want that to happen!
Scolded by who exactly? Without much of the content aggregated here by many of us close to Yaniv, half the gay ops happening wouldn’t have shit. Don’t come here and delete content like a pussy.
 
Sorry, I got scolded for sharing that screenshot.
I was told it could compromise something important, but rest assured that the "end game is near". I would love to archive it, but if someone's going to jail, I want that to happen!

Panties or gtfo. If you have a source, provide verification. If necessary, contact somebody more experienced in dealing with deniable leaks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wabbits
Scolded by who exactly? Without much of the content aggregated here by many of us close to Yaniv, half the gay ops happening wouldn’t have shit. Don’t come here and delete content like a pussy.
It was a ss of a request from the Langley RCMP to provide contact info and a copy of the alleged video of the potato masturbating while communicating with a minor. If this video exists it could be a catalyst to the end of Yaniv.

Personally, I don't believe there is such a video. If there was we would have seen it by now. I hope I am wrong.

And I don't give a flying fuck who I piss off. Scold me, baby.
 
I was told it could compromise something important, but rest assured that the "end game is near".

A load of people on Twitter shared it too. They're all speculating that JY is finally about to get charged for child luring/CP/one of the many other heinous acts involving children he's very obviously guilty of.


Given the subtleties of Canadian law and the large number of things the charges could be, I don't think this will compromise anything. But in any case the information is already out there due to the Twitter post.
 
A load of people on Twitter shared it too. They're all speculating that JY is finally about to get charged for child luring/CP/one of the many other heinous acts involving children he's very obviously guilty of.

I think that the location data is not being publicized because of the clusterfuck at the last hearing. It is the same date the weapons charges were adjourned to.
 
It was a ss of a request from the Langley RCMP to provide contact info and a copy of the alleged video of the potato masturbating while communicating with a minor. If this video exists it could be a catalyst to the end of Yaniv.

Personally, I don't believe there is such a video. If there was we would have seen it by now. I hope I am wrong.

And I don't give a flying fuck who I piss off. Scold me, baby.
The one Blaire White mentioned recently? Perhaps they haven't splashed it online due to not wanting to jeopardise anything? Then again, why wait for the cops to approach, why weren't the cops the first port of call once in receipt of it. smh.
 
I think that the location data is not being publicized because of the clusterfuck at the last hearing. It is the same date the weapons charges were adjourned to.
To be completely fair to the Canadian legal system, given the last shit show, and the presumption of innocence, they should take some effort to protect the accused. This is reasonable.
 
Please clarify what you mean by "newest one". The only one I see from Dec16 is Smith v Yaniv. Please clarify.

It’s listed in CSO just as Jessica Yaniv - file number is 1914124. I hadn’t realized there was also the case you posted above. It looks like Yaniv turned around and sued Donald at the same time. But instead of just filing a counterclaim, Yaniv started a whole new action.

Also, the legal basis is given as “Canadian Criminal Code”. 1) That’s not how you cite that, 2) You can’t just cite the whole law (imagine saying a law is unconstitutional “because of the Constitution”) and 3) the Criminal Code is rarely helpful for civil cases.

40F4EBDC-5469-4349-8604-CD6B4D58DA20.png
 
Last edited:
It’s listed in CSO just as Jessica Yaniv - file number is 1914124. I hadn’t realized there was also the case you posted above. It looks like Yaniv turned around and sued Donald at the same time. But instead of just filing a counterclaim, Yaniv started a whole new action.

View attachment 1054498
"No fees - wavied (sic)".
 
The one Blaire White mentioned recently? Perhaps they haven't splashed it online due to not wanting to jeopardise anything?

It could be that. It could be that Katie or Jess Rumpel or Louise Nussac testified. When Blaire White made the allegation and Yaniv denied it and threatened to sue people for libel Morgane Oger, who knows a thing or two about the uses and abuses of Canadian libel and hate speech laws and Yaniv's child luring ways said that it was 'consistent with a known pattern of conduct'.

I.e. in his opinion it's not defamatory for people to accuse Yaniv of masturbating in front of minors because everyone knows he has done so in the past.

Which is mindblowing. In the US calling someone a pedophile is 'defamation per se'


Prove that the defendant made a defamatory statement about the plaintiff. A defamatory statement is one that damages a plaintiff's reputation for good character. Some statements are so defamatory (e.g., Tim is a pedophile) that the plaintiff does not have to prove harm to his reputation; it is considered "defamation per se." Otherwise, a plaintiff will have to explain how his reputation has suffered as a result of defendant's statement. The defendant will have an opportunity to rebut the plaintiff's argument by submitting evidence that the plaintiff already had a poor reputation or that the statement is true.

Oger is saying that Yaniv's reputation is so ruined that calling him a pedo can no longer damage it and it is therefore not defamatory.
 
Last edited:
It’s listed in CSO just as Jessica Yaniv - file number is 1914124. I hadn’t realized there was also the case you posted above. It looks like Yaniv turned around and sued Donald at the same time. But instead of just filing a counterclaim, Yaniv started a whole new action.

Also, the legal basis is given as “Canadian Criminal Code”. 1) That’s not how you cite that, 2) You can’t just cite the whole law (imagine saying a law is unconstitutional “because of the Constitution”) and 3) the Criminal Code is rarely helpful for civil cases.

View attachment 1054498
Thanks, Donald filed his on Dec12, Yaniv filed his Dec13, and they were merged with respective limited fee waivers. There's a Riot room for debrief, if you care to indulge. Not sure if posting the URL here would trip the mods, but rather than shitting up the thread, maybe we can collate in the Riot, then post succinct articles here?

It looks like these are blossoming, I am amused. Can you forward your PDF to my direct email? I'll get it mirrored at another location.


EDIT: Timeline.

Dec12: Donald files his claim and waiver request. Limited Fee Waiver is granted.​
Dec13: Yaniv completes affidavit, possibly tries to file. Correlate with his "I'll sue you" tweets.​
Dec16: Yaniv files his counterclaim and Fee Waiver request. Limited Fee Waiver is granted.​
The Tard Fight has begun!​
 
Last edited:
It could be that. It could be that Katie or Jess Rumpel or Louise Nussac testified. When Blaire White made the allegation and Yaniv denied it and threatened to sue people for libel Morgane Oger, who knows a thing or two about the uses and abuses of Canadian libel and hate speech laws and Yaniv's child luring ways said that it was 'consistent with a known pattern of conduct'.

I.e. in his opinion it's not defamatory for people to accuse Yaniv of masturbating in front of minors because everyone knows he has done so in the past.

Which is mindblowing. In the US calling someone a pedophile is 'defamation per se'




Oger is saying that Yaniv's reputation is so ruined that calling him a pedo can no longer damage it and it is therefore not defamatory.
I've always said they're 2 cheeks of the same arse.

Have never got my head around yaniv never taking action and/or threatening action when called a pedo by so many on Twitter and such only when he's been dead named or misgendered. Who in the hell lets something like that slide?...unless of course, he was terrified of opening up a can of worms.

I've just finished reading an article "The Double Life of Ben Levin" ( https://torontolife.com/city/ben-levin-child-pornography-sting/ ) no similarities really (this bloke was an intellectual, well-liked, well respected and had a loving and supportive family) but made for an interesting read, particularly the narcissism, a feeling of invincibility, oh and the death of a parent. Seems he felt that as he hadn't actually physically harmed a child then hey no big deal, yeah.

" He defended his actions by saying he’d been stressed under the weight of his oppressive workload. His mother had recently died, and he was grieving her loss. He came up with excuses to explain away his behaviour. “Many people have done wrong things when they should have known better,” Levin said, promising he’d work hard to redeem himself. "


The police took a while to gather info to ensure a tight clad case and fortunately their hard work paid off. Although I feel the sentence this pervert got was way too light.
 
Last edited:
Where's the part where JY demands "he can't say mean things about me"?
Do they have anything up there where one can be ordered to not say anything about someone?
I pray there will be some court document available with the ruling afterwards.
Are transcripts of court hearings available to the public?
 
Does anyone have copies of the civil claims between Donny and Jonny? And this most recent bs? I don't want to pay the money if someone already did but I will otherwise. I'd like to get it posted online to see if I can spike his blood pressure as high as his blood sugar.

Help me catch up.... How many actions are in progress? I count one civil claim from Donny, one counterclaim, Yaniv requesting a restraining order, the whiny "private charges" and probably a partridge in their panties... What am I missing? Have they tried slapfighting or hair pulling?
 
I've always said they're 2 cheeks of the same arse.

Have never got my head around yaniv never taking action and/or threatening action when called a pedo by so many on Twitter and such only when he's been dead named or misgendered. Who in the hell lets something like that slide?...unless of course, he was terrified of opening up a can of worms.

I've just finished reading an article "The Double Life of Ben Levin" ( https://torontolife.com/city/ben-levin-child-pornography-sting/ ) no similarities really (this bloke was an intellectual, well-liked, well respected and had a loving and supportive family) but made for an interesting read, particularly the narcissism, a feeling of invincibility, oh and the death of a parent. Seems he felt that as he hadn't actually physically harmed a child then hey no big deal, yeah.

" He defended his actions by saying he’d been stressed under the weight of his oppressive workload. His mother had recently died, and he was grieving her loss. He came up with excuses to explain away his behaviour. “Many people have done wrong things when they should have known better,” Levin said, promising he’d work hard to redeem himself. "


The police took a while to gather info to ensure a tight clad case and fortunately their hard work paid off. Although I feel the pervert got a too light sentence.
That kind of excuse is just bullshit. I've been devastated by loss before. I never once thought that seeing photos of naked kids or fantasizing about having sex with them would make me feel better. Not once. As they say, adversity does not build character, it reveals it. And in Levin's and Yaniv's case, it revealed that they are pedos.
 
Back