- Joined
- Sep 21, 2021
I think that this thread, shitposts included, has provided me more philosophical insights than JP's repackaged Jungian sperging ever could.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So basically, philosophy is for well off people who have the luxury of being able to think all the time?This is an excellent point and goes to the heart of philosophy!
This is going off-topic, but Seneca is a prime example of this contention. His stoicism speaks of resignation from worldly affairs, how much better it is to be alone than to be in the court, yet he spent much of his life as a teacher and advisor to Nero. The early Roman historian Dio Cassius noted "while denouncing tyranny, Seneca was making himself a teacher of a tyrant," and while disparaging flattery in his letters, consistently fawned over the rich and powerful for his own gain. He was lucky enough to write essays and tragedies whilst living out the high life in the Roman court. His suicide execution, at least to me, seems like a parody of Socrates' own. He attempts to kill himself poetically as a stoic should, but it turns into a long, drawn-out affair as many over-thought actions do. Much like Mishima's failed seppuku (it was not as visually appealing as Paul Schrader makes it in the film) or Macbeth following the Witches' prophecy, the reality is never so clean as words and imagination make it out to be.
Seneca was a hypocrite of the highest order, yes, but would not a man who was sentenced to death three times not know the pleasures of resignation? Should we judge him by what he does or what he says he should be like? Now, I am not a stoic but Seneca's essays make me think and I am better off for reading them. He is a flawed character, yes, but it does not make him an unworthwhile read, simply a cause for understanding and restraint from leaping into ideals. If he had followed through on his thinking, and become the contemplative ascetic, I'm doubtful anyone would have heard of him, especially in the modern era. This you could apply to all abstract philosophies and the privilege of being able to preach them. Seneca, Jonathan Dollimore has written, "arguably demonstrates the inevitable, insightful failure of philosophy when it engages with the reality it seeks to know." Perhaps this is why Wittgenstein tried to escape the label of philosopher. He knew how 'the truth' led him astray from living and practicality (he wanted to be an architect and engineer). Philosophy is better off with his inner turmoil, however, as it made him frank and honest about its limitations.
A better example and one of my favourite sections in all of literature is from Samuel Johnson's Rasselas. Rasselas is a prince in search of "The Good Life." On his journey, he meets a philosopher, who waxes on about his idealised worldview and principles. Rasselas is impressed by the man's learning and tries to meet him the next day, not knowing the philosopher's daughter has died.
Rasselas leaves, "convinced of the emptiness of rhetorical sounds, and the inefficacy of polished periods and studied sentences." Johnson wrote the novel to cover his much-loved mother's funeral expenses. I am certain philosophers provided him with no comfort in his grief.
Historically, yes. Today? Not at all.So basically, philosophy is for well off people who have the luxury of being able to think all the time?
Big picture: it requires a certain amount of leisure time and an actual desire to engage in the activity, which means the more well off are apt to engage in it, but it isn’t always the case. Philosophical schools like Stoicism and Cynicism got really popular after Alexander the Great and when the first few generations of the Early Church started to spread around the Mediterranean, Stoicism was often their biggest rival in towns and settlements. You can even find Early Church Fathers struggling to even properly differentiate between Paul’s view on marriage versus that of Stoicism.So basically, philosophy is for well off people who have the luxury of being able to think all the time?
So in other words it is worthless for 99% of people.Stoicism is about conformity and quiet resignation to your luck which is super easy to pull off when you are rich nobility
There are pros and cons in it for people in all walks of life. Sometimes a facade of mental and physical well-being is just as important as actual well-being, especially if you have people who rely on you.So in other words it is worthless for 99% of people.
Pros: you can finally understand whatever tf Julius Evola was talking aboutWhat are the pros and cons of Esoteric Hitlerism?
The only thing you need to understand about Evola is he was a dandy scholar who after much reading came to the conclusion maybe there's good reason for the existence of tradition and spiritual practice, that ancient cultural markers contain far more impactful implicit knowledge than pea brained rationalist types are attempting to make explicit through faulty and incomplete experimental data. With this insight he fathered no children.Pros: you can finally understand whatever tf Julius Evola was talking about
Cons: crippling paranoid schizophrenia
How can self-help guru claim he can help others when he can't even help himself?!
And he's crying.... again.
His fanboys need to find a better father figure who has control over his emotions and isn't a massive grifter and clown.And he's crying.... again.
If he has kicked benzos, this is probably how he is dealing with rebound anxiety. His addiction pretty much put a wet blanket over his hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis and now that he has been clean long enough, it is back working at full steam and JP can’t handle the stress and anxiety of being a public figure without his pills.
Aka addiction. But that most likely convinced his tard fans that their daddy isn't a filthy drug addict.“physical dependence”
I want to feel bad for the guy because for who knows how many years he used drugs to cope with stress, and that is sad (stupid, but sad). However, given that his major stresses nowadays seem to stem almost entirely from the comment section on youtube videos/twitter replies, I really can't sympathize. Nigga just close your eyes lmaoIf he has kicked benzos, this is probably how he is dealing with rebound anxiety. His addiction pretty much put a wet blanket over his hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis and now that he has been clean long enough, it is back working at full steam and JP can’t handle the stress and anxiety of being a public figure without his pills.
Why doesn't he just log out and go touch grass?