Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died at 87. - 🦀


Christ, all this can be rebuffed with a so easily:

Adopting kids is racist
Catholic and that's basically the handermaidener tales tv show

It's quite funny to see leftists sperging out about the Handmaid's Tale while real life examples exist all over the Middle East. I know fuckers that will stop off in those countries just because the airport is cool or some other B.S. but bitch about losing the ability to kill babies.

If people choose back alley abortions it won't be because of Amy Coney Barrett or the SCOTUS, it will be because they were too cheap or lazy to order a pill online or drive over a state line, AT WORST.

Realistically, Roe isn't going anywhere as long as nonprofits have money to make from fighting over it.

Oh...what a burden. Killing a baby is a going to necessatate driving to a pozzed state.
 
I swear to god, they're actually doing it.

View attachment 1623655View attachment 1623656View attachment 1623657View attachment 1623658View attachment 1623659

They're going after her kids and that she dared adopt some Haitian children.

What is more likely: That they can't help themselves, or they're so far in the bubble that they think this is going to play well with actual human beings?

(((Ruth Ben-Ghiat)))
(((Jonathan Chait)))
 
Was he referring to Souter in that? That's doubly ironic since he retired but is also an example of a 'conservative' judge that ended up being worse than Roberts.
Yes, he was, and yes, you are entirely right. For his entire career, Biden has been anti-based.
 
This is just another example of "Whitey Can't Win: Why You Should Just Kill Yourself". Like that flowchart of "white supremacy" where moving into an area is gentrification and moving out is white flight, and seeing race is racist and not seeing race is racist.

>if you adopt black kids
Colonizer! You're kidnapping them!
>if you had adopted white kids
What are you, some sort of white supremacist?
 
Even if they use their stupid 2 hour rule, i'm sure Mitch McCocaine has something he can use to counter it while Chuckie just looks over his glasses like the impotent jew he is.

If the Dems use the 2-hour rule to stop hearings. McConnell can just move straight on to an up/down vote. Which he'd win. There's no legal requirement to even have a hearing, just the vote.
 
If the Dems use the 2-hour rule to stop hearings. McConnell can just move straight on to an up/down vote. Which he'd win. There's no legal requirement to even have a hearing, just the vote.
In fact there were no hearings on court nominations until Louis Brandeis, who was subject to a hearing in hope someone could find a way to keep a Jew off the court.
 
I believe all McConnell has to do is make sure the hearings start in the first 2 hours of the day and he's in the clear... right?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Oats12345
I swear to god, they're actually doing it.

View attachment 1623655View attachment 1623656View attachment 1623657View attachment 1623658View attachment 1623659

They're going after her kids and that she dared adopt some Haitian children.

What is more likely: That they can't help themselves, or they're so far in the bubble that they think this is going to play well with actual human beings?
Who thought a couple of black kids could rustle so many jimmies.
 
I swear to god, they're actually doing it.

View attachment 1623655View attachment 1623656View attachment 1623657View attachment 1623658View attachment 1623659

They're going after her kids and that she dared adopt some Haitian children.

What is more likely: That they can't help themselves, or they're so far in the bubble that they think this is going to play well with actual human beings?

1601163020285.png


Imagine being utterly shameless.
 
SCOTUS has a long and storied history of passing legislation. Almost always they pass legislation which favors progressives, everything from a national abortion mandate (Roe vs Wade) to gay marriage. The right are so pussy whipped and subservient to the left it would never occur to them that they could do the same, even if conservative judges dominate the court.
That's not passing legislation. That's deciding whether existing laws, which are the subject of some case they have decided to hear, are Constitutional. They're not going to wake up one day and decide to make a law that abortion is illegal. There's no mechanism for them to do that.

(Yes, I know case law is a term of art for binding precedent. Still not a legislature.)
 
Where were all these “POC adoption is bad” people before this? NOW it’s suddenly a big issue? Sure. It probably does happen but I highly doubt Barrett’s son was like that.

It’s also racist. I know people on this forum joke about “coal burning” if that’s the right phrase. But if you’re a decent parent to your kids that shouldn’t be a problem at all. Barrett’s kid is adopted of course, but he’s still her kid and she seems to love him like all her other kids. Is it taboo to have a black kid? Regardless of their birth status? Do normal people look at this and think “yeah I agree with these people claiming her kid was stolen from some poor family in another country and that’s terrible”?
 
Last edited:
Do normal people look at this and think “yeah I agree with these people claiming her kid was stolen from some poor family in another country and that’s terrible”?
And we're not talking just any other country. We're talking Haiti, which is Somalia without the cool factor.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Coffee Druid
Back