- Joined
- Oct 19, 2024
I'm not a Catholic (actually, I am an excommunicant heretic in the eyes of the Vatican), but this part of your argument doesn't exactly foster confidence in your ability to understand finer points of Catholic doctrine. I see what you're trying to argue here, but it relies on the text of the current Code of Canon Law, which was promulgated and took effect in 1983. Pope Honorius I died in the early 7th century, over a millennium before it was written. Canon law censures, like Honorius' anathema, can be posthumous, but they aren't usually retroactive. There are strict definitions for when an automatic penalty is applied, and nothing that would suggest it would be incurred by someone acting under duress more than 1300 years ago.Honorius was declared a Heretic by an Ecumenical Council; because under Roman Catholic Canon Law heresy automatically excommunicates you atae sententiae (meaning instantly and without the need of any formal or juridical recognition), this means that Honorius wasn't just anathematized after death—he removed himself automatically from the Church at the time.
Last edited: