TGWTG Kyle Kallgren / Oancitizen / Brows Held High - Afraid of the Eggnog Ninjas, "Male Feminist" that Abuses Women, 2nd-rate Cinema Snob, Hugh Hefner A-Log, Fat Creepy Incel Cuck

He's not wrong. They do worship him. But mostly because him and his brother write the checks.

The TGWTG site, as a whole, lost their fucking minds after the election. Most of them are cucks anyway, bit Doug himself has an obsessive hateboner for Trump that crosses into mental illness territory.

And that's why the site is pretty much a wall-to-wall anti-Trump circle-jerk. Everyone thinks they can tickle Doug's balls with "TAKE THAT DRUMPH!" content/tweets and become his super-secret-favorite employee.

It's pretty pathetic.


I don't even think the politics they hold are the problem. I know people all over the politcal spectrum who I think are decent people. Normal people can comment on politics and it's not annoying. But when someone is so childish that their whole universe is pop culture and twitter, it's a fucking joke when they climb up on the soapbox.
 
Didn't say funniest in the "movie" - funniest there.
Was there where you decided the best thing to do was fuck a cactus? or was that in a different god forsaken desert?
 
Didn't say funniest in the "movie" - funniest there.
I apologize profusely LordKaT... In my watching of "Channel :autism:" days... I didn't have a strong opinion of you, one way or the other.... But in recent weeks you have quickly become my favorite CA alum by far.
 
Doug is from Chicago. Which makes him both a hyper Liberal twit and gives him a natural raging hateboner for NYC.
Of all the CA reviewers, Doug honestly strikes me as the least likely to be a legitimate SJW. He's more comparable to a late-night talk show host who reads Trump jokes to his audience because its whats "in".

Hell, even Brad admitted who he supported in the last election. Did Doug even go that far? Granted I haven't been following him as closely as the other CA cows, but back when I used to watch his stuff the only political "humor" he inserted were jokes that he obviously made sure wouldn't offend anyone in his core audience.
 
I apologize profusely LordKaT... In my watching of "Channel :autism:" days... I didn't have a strong opinion of you, one way or the other.... But in recent weeks you have quickly become my favorite CA alum by far.

Yeah, @LordKaT is a total bro. Just remember that he's NOT a lamp. His content while on Channel Autism was some of the best, especially in regards to gaming. He was right up there with Spoony and better than the Butt-Blasted Bandito. It's a shame that they both fucked things up for LK, but at least he was able to get out of that shithole before things got bad. I'm glad we have him here.

Of all the CA reviewers, Doug honestly strikes me as the least likely to be a legitimate SJW. He's more comparable to a late-night talk show host who reads Trump jokes to his audience because its whats "in".

Hell, even Brad admitted who he supported in the last election. Did Doug even go that far? Granted I haven't been following him as closely as the other CA cows, but back when I used to watch his stuff the only political "humor" he inserted were jokes that he obviously made sure wouldn't offend anyone in his core audience.

Doug always seemed to be more moderate in his political jokes/sperging, at least to me. He's poked fun at both sides of the political spectrum and I haven't seen anything too viciously anti-Trump since the election. But that might be because he doesn't want to alienate any of his viewers, which is something I can respect from someone who makes a living entertaining others.
 
Of course, to Kyle any radical on his side doesn't represent real leftists, but any radical on the right just proves that they're all racist bigoted nazis.

That's the mindset of many people on both sides of the poliical spectrum, but it seems to be especially prevalent on the Left. And lately those on the extreme Left, like SJWs, have even started embracing the radicals because "they're fighting Nazis". Lefty mongos like Kyle honestly believe that Donald Trump is the new Adolf Hitler and the Republicans are the new Nazi Party. They've deluded themselves through their own violent and extremist rhetoric into believing it's the 1940's again and they're fighting fascism, when most of their own violent rhetoric, such as wanting to make it illegal for certain things to be said or to hold certain political views, and physically attacking/silencing anyone who doesn't agree with their political ideology is more genuinely fascist than anything President Trump or the Republicans have said or done.
 
Amen. The number of otherwise good/sane people I know on social media who think 'it's okay to punch Nazis', even if said 'Nazi' has done nothing to them, is alarming. Indiana Jones ain't real, guys. And the rantings of Chairman Kyle and pals don't help.
 
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: The Dude
Amen. The number of otherwise good/sane people I know on social media who think 'it's okay to punch Nazis', even if said 'Nazi' has done nothing to them, is alarming. Indiana Jones ain't real, guys. And the rantings of Chairman Kyle and pals don't help.
Nazis are the new Satanists/Commies

It is concerning when people start accusing you of being a crypto-fascist for pointing out that using violence against a marginalized group will probably push them to resort to violence themselves.

She fucked Phelous, that was enough to put me off her.
Phelous is one of the few TGWTG guys that are okay in my eyes. Allison just has terrible opinions and is a female sperglord.
 
Last edited:
It is concerning when people start accusing you of being a crypto-fascist for pointing out that using violence against a marginalized group will probably push them to resort to violence themselves.

Their problem with the Nazis (the actual ones, not Richard Spencer or his ilk) isn't that they used unjust force to achieve their means, but that it was directed against the wrong groups. Tribalism tends to attract animalistic morons who need a heard of like-minded sheep to cower behind.

People like Kyle fit this mold perfectly. I think his whole schtick of "I'm an intellectual who reviews obscure art films" is something he uses to hide from his own intellectual insecurities. He desperately wants to be seen as intelligent, because without that image, he has nothing. All these SJW types tend to be very shallow empty people, which is part of the reason why they keep going after every single minor issue as aggressively as they do. They think that following the path of feminist enlightenment will eventually lead to them being personally fulfilled, but it never does or will, and the longer it goes on the more bitter they get over time.
 
I think his whole schtick of "I'm an intellectual who reviews obscure art films" is something he uses to hide from his own intellectual insecurities. He desperately wants to be seen as intelligent, because without that image, he has nothing.
That's a good description of most intellectuals, honestly. Or, indeed, most people of any category who've ever been made to feel 'special' because of a skill they have - see also: musicians, athletes, artists, etc. They devote themselves so fully to their crafts and their image because they were praised for it at the expense of others recognizing their other traits. Some people are able to push past this praise, continue to pursue other interests, and become well-rounded individuals, but others can't because, like you said, they are insecure.

I imagine Kyle in particular was intellectually curious from a young age, your average shy-but-booksmart kid, and proud parents and teachers built the foundation for him to pride himself on this. Then as he got older, he found other hobbies, like in the dramatic arts. He went to college to become an actor, but also held a love for arthouse cinema. These movies fulfilled his inner smart-kid due to their reputation as high-brow, "difficult" media, so if he could understand and enjoy them, it meant he was doing something right. So, when he began his review series and received a huge audience, admiring his intellect, that admiration so strongly outweighed his other hobbies (which he received less praise for by default because his audience was not privy to them). So he quit dramatic acting and entered the world of filmmaking/film studies, craving more of that validation. It's a bit sad, really.
 
Last edited:
well well look who is showing his true colors
 

Attachments

  • kyle2.jpg
    kyle2.jpg
    82.1 KB · Views: 967

Saw the new video, he said something in the lines of "Auteurs" are mostly white men of power. You know, ignoring those independent film makers who are women, minorities, and from a lower class in society. Dude even used the term Auteur on the creator of "We are the Strange", and the guy who made that is a no name animator who made a movie on a shoe string budget.

How the fuck did he miss the reason why most people laugh at the movie, it is goofy and awkward as fuck. It isn't as deep as he suggests
 

Saw the new video, he said something in the lines of "Auteurs" are mostly white men of power. You know, ignoring those independent film makers who are women, minorities, and from a lower class in society. Dude even used the term Auteur on the creator of "We are the Strange", and the guy who made that is a no name animator who made a movie on a shoe string budget.

How the fuck did he miss the reason why most people laugh at the movie, it is goofy and awkward as fuck. It isn't as deep as he suggests
Kyle's thesis is flawed as fuck and crumbles if you take a moment to compare his arguments against each other. In particular, I was struck by the contradiction between 1) the fact he says that POC, women, etc. can't be auteurs because they lack an exhaustive body of work, and 2) the fact his entire video rests on proving that a filmmaker who's made only one movie is an auteur. Guess it doesn't matter because Tommy's a white guy? Yeesh.

Also was annoyed by the fact that, of all people, he used pics of Spike Lee and Sofia Coppola as examples of marginalized folks to support his "only white guys are auteurs" argument, when they're both prolific filmmakers and also probably the most mainstream examples of "black auteur" and "female auteur" respectively. (Not including Tyler Perry, who I imagine falls under the "vulgar auteur" theory.)

Normally I'm a fan of Kyle, despite... everything, but that was some bad content, my dudes
 
Last edited:
Back