Let's write titles of Catparty-style articles - Or a few sentences from an opening paragraph.

Underestimated Nutria

kiwifarms.net
Joined
May 2, 2019
Academic submissions also appreciated.

My effort

"The Supreme Court Conceptualised as an Infantile Phallus: Three Modalities to Penetrate Judicial Coquettishness" Opening sentences of a similar concept but in a non-academic presentation for dumb people, maybe Time or something: here we go: Every dinner party with two or more Supreme Court commentators will inevitably raise the eternal question: if the Court were a penis, what sort of penis would it be? Its dimensions? Its ethnicity? Its temperament, idiosyncrasies, peculiarities, particularities? If it is a black penis, can I in good conscience allow it to be the stereotypical Brobdingnagian Karen-slayer? Yet would it not be equally problematic to mockingly endow a sad wizened little dried snail of a penis just to confound the haters? Similarly, would not a monstrous gloriously be-veined Asian cock looking for its size like it would more properly belong in a museum of horrors also be objectionable, in juxtaposing lived experience with asian penises with this perhaps unrealistic fantasy? In this endless melee, it becomes apparent that we must salvage what we can and retreat -- all the way back to a small flaccid infancy.
 
Why Having the Same Rules for Everyone Perpetuates White Supremacy

No, It's Not Rape When A Transwoman Forces You To Have Sex With Her

Why Conservative Christians Should Have Their Kids Taken By CPS and Given to the community

The 6th Amendment Is Undemocratic and Protects Racists Like Derek Chauvin From Accountability. Repeal It.
 
Last edited:
Back