LGBTQiwis

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
synthetic_glazer said:
I totally get what you're saying but I think you might be misunderstanding me. Imo the concept of gays having rights is distinct from the gay rights movement and cultural push surrounding that. Obviously I don't have problems with gay people in a vacuum, but I don't really like how the "gay rights movement" as a social change movement has spiralled beyond "let us get married and leave us alone," to "bake the cake, bigot," and "a gay choir is singing 'we're coming for your children' and here's why that's a good thing."
Click to expand...
This is an example of how a profound historical and media illiteracy creates the conditions under which hard-won civil rights can erode. The whole reason the gay rights movement exists is because said rights are politically maintained. You’re benefiting from the outcomes of this while framing its ongoing effort as excessive.

A lot of the sensationalist shit you've posted is no different to the moral panic that was observed historically around gay people. Off the top of my head, the cake thing was the state suing the business to uphold the-fucking-anti-discrimination-law. From what I've gleamed of a two minute google, the san francisco gay men's choir was satirising stereotypes and prejudice, only for conservative media to intentionally misinterpret it not realising they're the butt of the joke. Do you also believe that “God is a lesbian" and "we're going to kill the mayor" are also plausible things? You can think it's shit art if you want, and you can critique aesthetics, disagree with tactics, or find some expressions off-putting, but you have to know why you think that, and it has to be organic beliefs held in good faith. That's the nuance part.


Otis Boi said:
Every faggot of color likes to play the game of making thier white boyfriend say the most racist vile thing you can imagine for fun. Then we share it with each other for laughs.

In all seriousness it's not as hard as you think. Most fags are going to be left leaning but most hardly care if you are against trannies/niggers/ect. Unless its the only thing you bring up and are completely retarded about it. :(
Click to expand...
Gay guys are still just guys, and we can all appreciate a bit of edgy humour. It's okay to laugh at the wrong thing if you know what the right thing is, most of the general population can have a good laugh at shit behind closed doors.
 
mister meaner said:
This is an example of how a profound historical and media illiteracy creates the conditions under which hard-won civil rights can erode.
Click to expand...
It's like any right or freedom you have. The moment you stop fighting is the moment you lose it.

Freedom of speech is the one right I will 100% defend in all its forms. See my post in the porn I.D ban thread. I know any eroding of it will have knock on effects on everything. Just look at how every country is trying to tie socail media to a real I.D. to protect kids. Its only going to be used to punish decent and wrong think slowly over time. Anonymity is a powerful tool for the unheard and oppressed.

Do I hate that I'm probably on the side of pedophiles,white supremacist, and other groups I ideologically oppose. Yes, but its a freedom I enjoy daily and I want everyone in the future to as well.
 
mister meaner said:
Off the top of my head, the cake thing was the state suing the business to uphold the-fucking-anti-discrimination-law.
Click to expand...
Assuming you were talking about Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, to my knowledge, the commission sued the bakery because of a complaint filed by the gay couple in question. If the couple didn’t care enough to get the state involved, it’s very unlikely that the bakery would’ve been sued to begin with.
mister meaner said:
From what I've gleamed of a two minute google, the san francisco gay men's choir was satirising stereotypes and prejudice, only for conservative media to intentionally misinterpret it not realising they're the butt of the joke.
Click to expand...
If I recall correctly, some of the singers were later found in the sex offender registry for sexually assaulting boys. The case that it’s just satire doesn’t work if multiple singers did come for the kids.
 
Last edited:
The Cringe Connoisseur said:
I'll have sex with both but I married a guy who I relate to and share interests with because the women around here are mostly generic stupid white trash and I refuse to tolerate stupid people in my life because they piss me off lol.
Click to expand...
I have dated a few men before but it never really went anywhere. I think it's because I was going for the gym bro/sporty gay types, I ended up as the more feminine of the two and it made me feel uncomfortable AF so I noped out lol!!

synthetic_glazer said:
I have to ask, where do you homos find gay men who aren't fully immersed in woke brainrot? Pretty much every one I've met- expectedly- supports the gay rights movement (I have a lot of problems with it but I can see the logic there,) but also every other cause.
Click to expand...
Try and look for men who are in blue collar work or in professions that aren't particularly viewed positively by the left. Cops, military guys, much of tech (post Elon's twitter takeover) etc. Avoid the fags who work in humanities or the arts like the plague.
 
Last edited:
Otis Boi said:
You'd also be surprised how many gay men hate trannies and straight out exclude them from alot of things.
Click to expand...
Oh no not at all there has been a steadily growing movement of gays bisexuals and lesibians in general that wants to kick the Ts and Qs to the curb for a while now and the worthless retards brought it upon themselves by doing absolutely nothing but making us all look bad and setting civil rights back like it's something to do. Fuck these entitled narcissistic psychos.
 
synthetic_glazer said:
I have to ask, where do you homos find gay men who aren't fully immersed in woke brainrot? Pretty much every one I've met- expectedly- supports the gay rights movement (I have a lot of problems with it but I can see the logic there,) but also every other cause. Not just related ones like trans shit and feminism stuff, but the entire leftist dogma like mask mandates, open borders, blm, Palestine, etc.

I understand I have very extreme views so I'm not necessarily trying to find someone who agrees with me on every single belief (nor would I want that,) but it's felt impossible to find anyone who doesn't adopt every single left wing cause wholesale
Click to expand...
Personally, I've been looking for a boyfriend on Kiwifarms.net.
 
synthetic_glazer said:
I know you're joking but there is an actual otp/shipping bingo thread for that lmao one I have had no luck in because true love is illegal on KiwiFarms (:_(
Click to expand...
I am looking for a cute boyfriend-free GIRL but an anonymous forum does not seem to be the best place to meet people (I can't trust the people here)
 
Newton Pud said:
If I recall correctly, some of the singers were later found in the sex offender registry for sexually assaulting boys. The case that it’s just satire doesn’t work if multiple singers did come for the kids.
Click to expand...

Whenever you get a group of men together, there’s always going to be at least a handful of kid diddlers—but child abuse is a *virtue* of the gay community. AIDs didn’t do enough.

I’m an L separatist, all the other letters can rot.
 
Last edited:
FarmVille said:
Whenever you get a group of men together, there’s always going to be at least a handful of kid diddlers—but child abuse is a *virtue* of the gay community. AIDs didn’t do enough.

I’m an L separatist, all the other letters can rot.
Click to expand...
Please explain how child abuse is a virtue of the gay community :)
 
Leather Gliscor said:
Please explain how child abuse is a virtue of the gay community :)
Click to expand...

Child abuse is male behavior and when men are left to themselves all the worst shit of the male psyche gets glorified. I don’t think gay men are necessarily more deviant but they stew in (literal) shit longer.

Also gay men are comfortable smelling shit, touching shit, and smearing shit on themselves. It’s a poop-based sexuality which is just nasty.
 
Last edited:
awoo said:
Is "bottom energy" real? Like I wonder if gays or lesbians can tell just by looking at someone if he/she is a top or bottom
Click to expand...
Yes, you can tell easy.
FarmVille said:
Also gay men are comfortable smelling shit, touching shit, and smearing shit on themselves. It’s a poop-based sexuality which is just nasty.
Click to expand...
Where does this idea come from? Do straights/lesbians think we dont clean out and enjoy shitting everywhere?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom