If you're ever seen a piece of media where there is a rape scene, usually the act of rape is not framed in a positive light for the viewer. Violent videogames usually do not portray murder, for the sake of pure bloodlust, in a positive light. Usually, there's a reason for the shooting you're doing in them. Things like first-person shooters are typically about opposing military factions, stopping terrorists, or being a superhero. Granted, there are some games like the Postal series, where you are genuinely playing as a psychopath on a killing spree. But Postal's protagonist is still clearly portrayed as a crazy mentally ill person. Not someone to look up to.
The GTA series has been a vast success. You're really gonna tell me the protagonists are people to look up to?
It doesn't take "pure bloodlust" to do demented shit. But GTA enables that also. It's not the main focus, but it's basically deeply ingrained.
One of the main reasons GTA is so popular is actually this "morally grey at best" aspect. It gets you into the mind of a violent criminal who feels justified rather than a pure lunatic. This kind of thing is extremely common in games, but also all other media. But this I feel is an equivalence with loliniggers, as most of them don't go for outright violence and rape, preferring "heckin wholesome grooming stories".
The suspension of disbelief aspect with the world and/or character-building, also common, is also intended to elicit this feeling of "this wouldn't be as questionable in this alternate reality".
I get that you don't see the rationalizations loliniggers may have as substantial to the same degree, and that may be true. But I think that the fact that nobody basically ever has this conversation means that they will often just swallow the pill of "it's the stigma and the controversy around lolicon that makes this seem more tied in with reality than it really is".
I consider this statement true enough, but basically through correlation. The reality of socially cohesive discussion about ethics, openly and without threat, is not the reality that these people are facing when it comes to this part of them. And it is a part of them that they should completely acknowledge and deeply analyze the implications of, and constantly be on top of. But again, there's no such reality, least of all in some of these places that might advertise otherwise.
I don't think I'd be wrong even if most lolinggers were fully conscious of being pedophiles. That they deny it, or perhaps as equally important, that they
don't admit it, contributes a lot to how they are perceived, which then viciously circles back to what I've already put down. It's the type of predicament that creates Bible-thumping closet fags, when augmented enough.
