Horrorcow Lucas Werner - A man of Spokane, Washington who is obsessed with millennial and Gen Z chicks

How, in Lucas’s deranged viewpoint, does this statement not qualify him as an incel?
5CC1FA1F-69AF-49E9-A4F4-0E1C7ED4393D.jpeg
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Viridian, AbraCadaver and 4 others
A couple of pages back there was some speculation about why Lucas considers the mere existence of other men near a woman to be a "cockblock."

The answer is simple, really: Lucas is a predator.

To elaborate, Lucas is a shitty predator. And the methodology of predators like him is to separate their intended victim, isolate them, and then work them over. We saw it with the British catfish, the one whom Lucas demanded slice off her finger for him. The way he treated her involved heavy coercion, gaslighting and other abusive behavior.

This is the way Lucas would treat a girl IRL from minute one if he could get her alone. This is the winning seduction method he's always hinting that he could employ if only there was no one in his way.

And so, the reason why other dudes simply being in the same space as the girl is a cockblock is crystal clear: if those guys are there, they will intervene if they see someone like Lucas trying to abuse or hurt the girl. And even if they don't notice immediately, Lucas knows that the girl's first instinct will be to turn to the other guys for help.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: JenkinsJinkies, spiritofamermaid, Dusk and 18 others
DeletedSoul said:
A couple of pages back there was some speculation about why Lucas considers the mere existence of other men near a woman to be a "cockblock."

The answer is simple, really: Lucas is a predator.

To elaborate, Lucas is a shitty predator. And the methodology of predators like him is to separate their intended victim, isolate them, and then work them over. We saw it with the British catfish, the one whom Lucas demanded slice off her finger for him. The way he treated her involved heavy coercion, gaslighting and other abusive behavior.

This is the way Lucas would treat a girl IRL from minute one if he could get her alone. This is the winning seduction method he's always hinting that he could employ if only there was no one in his way.

And so, the reason why other dudes simply being in the same space as the girl is a cockblock is crystal clear: if those guys are there, they will intervene if they see someone like Lucas trying to abuse or hurt the girl. And even if they don't notice immediately, Lucas knows that the girl's first instinct will be to turn to the other guys for help.
Click to expand...

Yes, that's what he way trying to do with the 16 yr old Starbucks girl. He wanted for her to email him through his Conversationrage website to say no to the "date". This way he would have her email address thinking her could manipulate/work her over without anyone interfering with his plan. He has also claimed that the "note" was clean, no mention of sex, but anyone who is familiar with Lucas knows in his deranged predatory Lucas "speak" , date=sex. And the give away "men over 35 to 55 will give your children stronger dna". His sick website "conversationrage" -- all about teens/young women needing to have sex ,mating/breeding with men 35-55.

He starts at the 1:28 mark

 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Viridian, Digital Thunder and 1 other person
DeletedSoul said:
A couple of pages back there was some speculation about why Lucas considers the mere existence of other men near a woman to be a "cockblock."

The answer is simple, really: Lucas is a predator.

To elaborate, Lucas is a shitty predator. And the methodology of predators like him is to separate their intended victim, isolate them, and then work them over. We saw it with the British catfish, the one whom Lucas demanded slice off her finger for him. The way he treated her involved heavy coercion, gaslighting and other abusive behavior.

This is the way Lucas would treat a girl IRL from minute one if he could get her alone. This is the winning seduction method he's always hinting that he could employ if only there was no one in his way.

And so, the reason why other dudes simply being in the same space as the girl is a cockblock is crystal clear: if those guys are there, they will intervene if they see someone like Lucas trying to abuse or hurt the girl. And even if they don't notice immediately, Lucas knows that the girl's first instinct will be to turn to the other guys for help.
Click to expand...
Indeed. I think one thing that goes along nicely with the predator comparison is his clumsy attempts at being some kind of SJW, using words like ‘problematic’ and ‘privilege’... Aggressive Mimicry is a predatory trait in the animal kingdom in which a predator may assume a guise that its prey finds non-threatening.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Free the Pedos, Begemot and 7 others
mothman96 said:
He has also claimed that the "note" was clean, no mention of sex, but anyone who is familiar with Lucas knows in his deranged predatory Lucas "speak" , date=sex.
Click to expand...

Not only that but the back of the note had the sentence "Why do I feel this need to be inside of you?". How in gods name does that have nothing to do with sex? Also I love how he claims that the hookers in town are with people their own ages as opposed to anyone who has the money to pay and that he is going to win the Starbucks case because Fuck you. He will never obtain pussy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Free the Pedos, Viridian and 4 others
Trainwreck said:
It's so amusing to me that Lucas claims an attorney contacted him regarding his Starbucks issue. Barratry is illegal in Washington state. No attorney in their right mind would seek this fucking idiot out under the threat of a misdemeanor or of being disbarred.
Click to expand...
The only lawyer that MIGHT have contacted him was one his victim hired to tell him to fuck off. I could see that happening.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Viridian, ⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛ and 3 others
DeletedSoul said:
A couple of pages back there was some speculation about why Lucas considers the mere existence of other men near a woman to be a "cockblock."

The answer is simple, really: Lucas is a predator.

To elaborate, Lucas is a shitty predator. And the methodology of predators like him is to separate their intended victim, isolate them, and then work them over. We saw it with the British catfish, the one whom Lucas demanded slice off her finger for him. The way he treated her involved heavy coercion, gaslighting and other abusive behavior.

This is the way Lucas would treat a girl IRL from minute one if he could get her alone. This is the winning seduction method he's always hinting that he could employ if only there was no one in his way.

And so, the reason why other dudes simply being in the same space as the girl is a cockblock is crystal clear: if those guys are there, they will intervene if they see someone like Lucas trying to abuse or hurt the girl. And even if they don't notice immediately, Lucas knows that the girl's first instinct will be to turn to the other guys for help.
Click to expand...
This is brilliant: it was staring us in the face all along, and you named it.

The reason Luke views the mere presence of other men as such an obstacle is his limited social comprehension that certain thing are simply "not done" in acceptable social interaction, and he intends to do those things quite deliberately.

It's actually a tacit admission that he sees his own behavior as inappropriate, maneuvering the girl to absolute privacy in order to try and "get away with it".

I wonder, if we're right about this pathology, does it suggest that he's BEYOND social redemption or not?

Purely speculative, I understand.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Begemot, Viridian and 5 others
GleamingTheQ-Bert said:
This is brilliant: it was staring us in the face all along, and you named it.

The reason Luke views the mere presence of other men as such an obstacle is his limited social comprehension that certain thing are simply "not done" in acceptable social interaction, and he intends to do those things quite deliberately.

It's actually a tacit admission that he sees his own behavior as inappropriate, maneuvering the girl to absolute privacy in order to try and "get away with it".

I wonder, if we're right about this pathology, does it suggest that he's BEYOND social redemption or not?

Purely speculative, I understand.
Click to expand...
I know I've read Lucas saying he wouldn't back off even if he's making the girl he's hitting on uncomfortable. He's a psycho Narcissist beyond redemption. Doesn't have a redeeming bone in his body.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Free the Pedos, Emotional Prolapse and 4 others
mothman96 said:
I know I've read Lucas saying he wouldn't back off even if he's making the girl he's hitting on uncomfortable. He's a psycho Narcissist beyond redemption. Doesn't have a redeeming bone in his body.
Click to expand...

Yea you hear mental health professionals/activists always going on about how we should ‘see the person behind the condition’. Frankly in Lucas's case we see the person.. and the person is a perverted, useless cunt.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Viridian, strandedcastaway and 10 others
His anarcho-communist posts make my head want to explode every time I read them.

He is dependent on two things: tardbucks and not having to work.

Anarchists would refuse to give him tardbucks.

Communists would jail him for refusing to work.

Anarchism also doesn't mean getting child pussy either because no age of consent won't solve every female being disgusted by him. And if he tries to rape them in such a society he'll be lynched. Possibly for the best.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, CallMeDoctorWerm, NimertiS and 4 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back