Fennec exists, which is a privacy-based fork of Firefox mobile, and you can also further harden it like with vanilla Firefox.
I can get 90% of the way by just switching to another software. Not even switching to chromium.
As if they didn't already. And mozilla WILL cuck on anything the powers that be say, like with the DRM extensions.
To link back to the other post. Brave will be, on default settings, a better option than Firefox is on default settings. Yes you can user.js your way into making default-firefox into something better than chrome but even power users won't bother a lot of the time if just switching gets you most of the way there.
That's one of the many reasons chrom-anything will never be a viable alternative for anyone that used a browser before Google decided to shift away from traditional, sane paradigms from 2008 onwards, and every derivative is just going to have to catch up patching every retarded decision they settle their mind on ("them" being jewgle alone, true scum even among other corpos), and that no free contributors could ever possibly keep up to date with within a reasonable time (ungoogled would very often be severely out of date years ago with exploits being used in the wild.. what are you going to do, stop using it for a week or two?). History grouping is one such "feature", I would love to know if there is one person on this planet that uses that feature effectively, and what their thought process is. They're opinionated for the lowest common denominator user that does not have a basic understanding of basic, decades-old technology patterns (not necessarily their fault, as those same companies always try to take that knowledge away from them), with dozens of millions of lines of code under the hood unmaintainable by anyone but them. Most importantly, using any engine coming off KHTML (mercy its soul long twisted and corrupted by soydevs and pajeets) is encouraging webshitters to only design their pages for those browsers alone that account for.. yeah, that's about >90% market share. The march of tyranny will continue to the bottom. It's a shame luakit-like approaches are unfeasible.
I could even browse and shitpost here with it until kiwiflare went up (which, unlike haproxy, doesn't have a noscript fallback).
Man, there really is no way out for a Gecko appreciator, isn't there?
Honestly, I fully expect a person who cares about their privacy to "power user" their way into making a situation better. If we want to get into the nit-picky of it, installing a user.js in Firefox is easier than switching to another browser. It's a drag and drop. You also don't even need to make your own a la Arkenfox. Betterfox (The one I linked to) gets the job done for most people.
The proof is that once the market share of browser usage goes 100% to Chromium based browsers, the entire ecosystem of how website are written and interacted with changes. For example the move to Manifest V3 and the attempt by Google to disable adblocking in Chrome by forcing everyone to update to Manifest V3.
Is is not just soooo curious that when Chrome, Chromium or any other browser whatsoever gets caught secreting spyware/malware, the usual fanboys have all shat themselves in unison, broke out the pitchforks'n'torches, and hastened into meltdown mode...yet when the darling of the browsers get exposed doing the exact same thing, it's time to break out the 'pussy passes' for the beloved Firefox!
