"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I didn't want to get into the details of incel and mgtow stuff, but since you mentioned it. I disagree with Josh about incels. I think most are a victim of circumstance, such as being in male dominated careers that have few chances to meet women. Then there's women's ridiculously high standards. To get his foot in the door, a man these days has to be 6'3, own a house, own a new car (no older than 2020), make 6 figures, have 6 pack abs, a 6 inch penis, have no kids, be fine with her kids, do all the house work, and have a university degree.
That is if you want to get someone very nice. Sure, you can look normal and girls still will have nothing to do with you. That's actually on them for having unrealistic standards. I mean, far from every girl look like a model that can keep those standards without looking like a femcel.
So in some cases there are incels, and in others femcels. There are just more attention on the incels because "Men bad" and the societal idea that women are sooo innocent and can do no wrong. Guess what, majority of women can and will be equally as retarded as majority of men. Which is made worse when men are simping for them, and society have this idea that a man should be grateful that a woman even wants anything to do with him.
 
Vingle is a homosexual man btw, that's why he has issues with straight men simping for women instead of plundering his bootyhole.
meme(1).png
 
Not sure if anyone has suggested talking about this.

The American Medical Association wants the govt to sponsor and subsidize "uterus transplants" into transgender patients. This is notable as it's something that has never been accomplished without accidentally killing the patient. And they want the government to pay for it and subsidize it.

It's a pretty notable procedure as it's something that occurred during Weimar Germany where they tried a uterus transplant into a transgender person and it resulted in the death of the patient. There was even a movie about it starring Eddie Redmayne.
 
Uterus transplantation is a really experimental procedure with a high risk of death to the patient and very few doctors willing to do it. It's also not considered life saving since it's easier to just remove it than put a new one in. In some cases the uterus even doesn't stay in the patient for very long. Like in Saudi Arabia they did a uterus transplant and had to remove it 99 days later because it entered necrosis. It's still unknown if it's even possible for a male body to not reject a uterus.

Then there's also the other problems that will inevitably come from such a procedure or any organ transplant procedure. Which are the body will forever see it as a foreign vessel and you'll need to take immunosuppressive drugs for the rest of your life to prevent the immune system from attacking it. Which leaves you at major risk of infection and premature death from any sort of illness your body would normally be able to fight off easily.

If it was theoretically possible to put in without immediately killing the patient I'd suspect it'd become a trendy surgery to perform for transgender people. And I'd suspect it'd lead to a lot of accidental deaths and threats of suicide if a doctor refuses to do it. This has some history to it given Lili Elbe planned to commit suicide until they found a doctor willing to attempt to put a uterus into their body.
 
Last edited:
Not sure if anyone has suggested talking about this.

The American Medical Association wants the govt to sponsor and subsidize "uterus transplants" into transgender patients. This is notable as it's something that has never been accomplished without accidentally killing the patient. And they want the government to pay for it and subsidize it.

It's a pretty notable procedure as it's something that occurred during Weimar Germany where they tried a uterus transplant into a transgender person and it resulted in the death of the patient. There was even a movie about it starring Eddie Redmayne.
If uterus transplants into men have a 100% death rate, they're asking taxpayers to fund TTD. Shut up and take my money, I'm in!
 
one might be forgiven for thinking that AMA is talking about women who decide to be men, but have a faulty uterus and need a transplant, as has been done approx 100 times (very very very very early days)
but they are in fact talking specifically about men who become "trans women", it is a far flung fantasy that probably isnt even possible
they are using the data from women who received transplants to make it seem in the article like its not too far away that we can do this to a man now that its shown some success in women
from everything i read, sadly, a lot of these transplants for women are only temporary for whatever reason? i dont think anybody understands it well enough yet
 
one might be forgiven for thinking that AMA is talking about women who decide to be men, but have a faulty uterus and need a transplant, as has been done approx 100 times (very very very very early days)
but they are in fact talking specifically about men who become "trans women", it is a far flung fantasy that probably isnt even possible
they are using the data from women who received transplants to make it seem in the article like its not too far away that we can do this to a man now that its shown some success in women
from everything i read, sadly, a lot of these transplants for women are only temporary for whatever reason? i dont think anybody understands it well enough yet
What blows my mind about this is it's literally a procedure that has never been done without killing the patient and they are demanding the government pay for it. The fact that the American Medical Association is pushing this is absurd it's genuinely anti-science to push something like this that hasn't been proven to even be possible in the first place.
 
What blows my mind about this is it's literally a procedure that has never been done without killing the patient and they are demanding the government pay for it. The fact that the American Medical Association is pushing this is absurd it's genuinely anti-science to push something like this that hasn't been proven to even be possible in the first place.
You fucking fools, you absolute morons, the AMA wants to fund a procedure that has killed every patient it's been tried on AND it is something troons will line up around the block to do?
 
I never listened to Bo Burnham because he always seemed like a redditor but that joshcore welcome to the internet cover got me interested.

I really like it, at least what's on YouTube from that album Inside. Its very clever, and heartfelt. Really cool production and filming. Reminded me how bad people had during the ridiculous lockdowns.
 
Not sure if anyone has suggested talking about this.

The American Medical Association wants the govt to sponsor and subsidize "uterus transplants" into transgender patients. This is notable as it's something that has never been accomplished without accidentally killing the patient. And they want the government to pay for it and subsidize it.

It's a pretty notable procedure as it's something that occurred during Weimar Germany where they tried a uterus transplant into a transgender person and it resulted in the death of the patient. There was even a movie about it starring Eddie Redmayne.
Really proving josh right about the "things can always get worse" point he made during the ralph interview. Christ.
 
What blows my mind about this is it's literally a procedure that has never been done without killing the patient and they are demanding the government pay for it. The fact that the American Medical Association is pushing this is absurd it's genuinely anti-science to push something like this that hasn't been proven to even be possible in the first place.
It's all about the fetish. If the transplant goes well even once you'll have trannies bragging about it, and probably use it to strengthen their idea that they are real women. Even the idea of them trying to get pregnant with the transplanted organ is part of the fetish. There are plenty of examples of them getting off to the idea of being breeding stock, or just getting knocked up in general.

Then you have the doctors who see this as a way to make easy money on high risk experimental operations that they will wash their hands clean of when they finish the operations. They use these freaks as a way to get a steady flow of income by making them dependent on medications, and forcing surgeries onto the people that think they might be trans.
 
They are just drawings and no one is hurt, but anyone consuming those drawings is a pedophile and should never be trusted around children. It is an attraction to children in a similar way that furfaggotry is an attraction to animals. I wouldn't trust a furry around my dog in the same way I wouldn't trust people that consume lolicon around children.

In general, I think we need to bring back shame. People should be ashamed of their fetishes and attractions if they go outside the norm.
 
Pippa and another V-Tuber discuss how loli is just drawings with no victims.
That discussion was frustrating to watch. It's like they almost get it, but have some mental block.
>loli didn't turn him into a pedophile, he read it because he was already a pedophile
YES.
The issue with loli doesn't lie in the loli stuff itself (they're right that it's just drawings), but in the audience for it. I don't think it's a leap to say that someone who gets off to drawings of children at a minimum has pedophilic tendencies. Many of the artists are more or less open pedophiles on their social media.
I think that aspect is necessary for the discourse, otherwise you end up with a lolbertarian circlejerk like that, that doesn't get a grip on why people have a problem with it.
I'm agnostic on whether porn addicts can develop an interest in children this way, but I don't think that's as absurd an idea as they make it out to be either. I think it's well established that transgression in itself has erotic potential and what greater transgression can there be than pedophilia? And what easier to way to feed fantasies than legal, and in some circles acceptable, loli porn?
Sure, it's just drawings, but do you want to associate with people who masturbate to drawings of children or stories about grooming children or having sex with children? Do you really think that says nothing about them? Do you really want those people to be in your community? Normalise these interests?

I wish someone'd challenge them on this, but I wouldn't expect it in the anime people community.

>muh video games cause violence
A better analogy would be a man masturbating to drawn gay porn, and anime people claiming that's a normal heterosexual thing to do.
 
Back