"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

Honestly, Ralph's deflecting frantically and desperately. He's engaged to an admitted pedo openly, so who the fuck knows what he's into when he thinks no one's watching. Like that Lt Corbis bullshit that looked questionable at best.

His fixation on Josh specifically seems to be a 'clear cut' case of mental illness. Plenty of people have made fun of Ralph way harsher than Josh's casual South Park reference, but something (potentially after the initial lashing out) made him zero in to the point where his entire existence now seems to revolve around Josh in some way. Is it because other people gave Ralph backlash for his initial freakout at Josh, so now Ralph needs to PrOvE tHeM aLl WrOnG to reclaim his dignity? Who can say? Ralph's degenerated into such a fucking nutjob over one joke that I can't tell which way his head is screwed onto that walking gunt. Ralph is crazy, he's fucking crazy, and he's probably spawning crazy.
ummmm bro she's totally trad as fuark now. she was merely tricked into claiming to be a demiboy lolicon by that damn dirty digibro (eventually beatrice, the golden bitch). riley (formerly billy) was in on the whole thing, it was all an elaborate 24 hour op masterminded by dick molesterson (formerly mexicanson) to milk content from digi-nee-baroness-grey-trixie-fire. idiot.

Non shitpost edit: I also find it very strange that ralph has developed an obsession with shitting on josh at every possible opportunity. Josh makes it very clear that he doesn't like pedophiles or trannies or anything like that. He straight up bans people for saying the C word, and I can't really fault him for socially shaming the totally fictional anime pedophiles. Meanwhile I don't think ralph has even addressed the fact that may has been into lolishit in the past, unless I missed something, which is entirely possible. Ralph also has degenerates like that crossdressing lady maga person on his show, but it's meant to provide content so I can't really fault him that much, it's just that he doesn't really seem to me (as someone who only gets news of him tangentially) to be pressing them on the issues like josh might, were he in ralph's position. Think about josh's opinion on non reproductive politicians, how he thinks they straight up shouldn't be allowed to run for office if they have no concrete stake in the next generation via their children. Can you imagine ralph ever saying anything like that? Of course not, he's simply a grifter who goes with the simple anti libtard reddit politics, and I believe he perceives, through some warped reasoning, that his crusade against josh and the forum to be in his best financial interests. I dunno. I'm not the best ralphamale historian.
 
Last edited:
Honestly, Ralph's deflecting frantically and desperately. He's engaged to an admitted pedo openly, so who the fuck knows what he's into when he thinks no one's watching. Like that Lt Corbis bullshit that looked questionable at best.

His fixation on Josh specifically seems to be a 'clear cut' case of mental illness. Plenty of people have made fun of Ralph way harsher than Josh's casual South Park reference, but something (potentially after the initial lashing out) made him zero in to the point where his entire existence now seems to revolve around Josh in some way. Is it because other people gave Ralph backlash for his initial freakout at Josh, so now Ralph needs to PrOvE tHeM aLl WrOnG to reclaim his dignity? Who can say? Ralph's degenerated into such a fucking nutjob over one joke that I can't tell which way his head is screwed onto that walking gunt. Ralph is crazy, he's fucking crazy, and he's probably spawning crazy.
Ralph hates Josh specifically because the forum ruthlessly mocks him and archives his every waking moment online. If Ralph even breaths online it's archived and listed on the forum, the forum that has exploded in popularity due to Chris being arrested. Ralph hates Josh over the corn joke, absolutely, but his continued fixation upon him is because this site is a free history book containing all of Ralph's numerous fuck ups. If the site went down Ralph would almost certainly have a heart attack just from the euphoria alone.
Vacation is not this week. It will be in September. I'll make it known unambiguously. Stream tomorrow.
Is the stream on Trovo/Odysee, or are you going back to YouTube? Even with them cucking for Ralph I like using Odysee since you introduced me to it. Pretty solid for a Google alternative.
 
Is the stream on Trovo/Odysee, or are you going back to YouTube? Even with them cucking for Ralph I like using Odysee since you introduced me to it. Pretty solid for a Google alternative.
I've been simulcasting.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Pyre
Good to see I'm not too late.
By the way there is some minor inconsistency in what Null said in the last few weeks. I remember distinctly you/him making a big thing out of how women can totes still reproduce perfectly fine when they're way past the wall (I think it was in the shoeonhead person stream), but on the national friendship day stream on rekieta, you/he brought up barb having chris way into her late thirties/early fourties and that having an adverse effect on the end result.

So which is it? Indefinite flawless reproduction or decay of ovaries and womb? I don't think validating dead-eggers' copes is a healthy thing to do.
 
Good to see I'm not too late.
By the way there is some minor inconsistency in what Null said in the last few weeks. I remember distinctly you/him making a big thing out of how women can totes still reproduce perfectly fine when they're way past the wall (I think it was in the shoeonhead person stream), but on the national friendship day stream on rekieta, you/he brought up barb having chris way into her late thirties/early fourties and that having an adverse effect on the end result.

So which is it? Indefinite flawless reproduction or decay of ovaries and womb? I don't think validating dead-eggers' copes is a healthy thing to do.
If you go to Josh for gynecologic advice you are not doing it right...
 
Good to see I'm not too late.
By the way there is some minor inconsistency in what Null said in the last few weeks. I remember distinctly you/him making a big thing out of how women can totes still reproduce perfectly fine when they're way past the wall (I think it was in the shoeonhead person stream), but on the national friendship day stream on rekieta, you/he brought up barb having chris way into her late thirties/early fourties and that having an adverse effect on the end result.

So which is it? Indefinite flawless reproduction or decay of ovaries and womb? I don't think validating dead-eggers' copes is a healthy thing to do.
40 and 30 are 10 years apart. To put this into perspective, 20 and 30 are also 10 years apart. They are not the same number. They're off by about 10.

See: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=what+is+the+difference+between+40+and+30
1629468210062.png
 
Good to see I'm not too late.
By the way there is some minor inconsistency in what Null said in the last few weeks. I remember distinctly you/him making a big thing out of how women can totes still reproduce perfectly fine when they're way past the wall (I think it was in the shoeonhead person stream), but on the national friendship day stream on rekieta, you/he brought up barb having chris way into her late thirties/early fourties and that having an adverse effect on the end result.

So which is it? Indefinite flawless reproduction or decay of ovaries and womb? I don't think validating dead-eggers' copes is a healthy thing to do.
Nigga, do you have any Earthly idea how defective sperm from a 55 year old man is? It's way the hell more defective than eggs from a 41 year old woman, which are already in the process of becoming defective. 25-35 are the best breeding years for a human woman for many reasons both physical and psychological, one of them being that the eggs aren't at risk of going bad yet. Dumb whore or not, like it or not, Shoe still has enough time to get her shit together and become a stable married mother like she wants if she actually tries.

Why are guys like you so mad about being told that you don't have an excuse to chase teenage girls who don't know any better?
 
Good to see I'm not too late.
By the way there is some minor inconsistency in what Null said in the last few weeks. I remember distinctly you/him making a big thing out of how women can totes still reproduce perfectly fine when they're way past the wall (I think it was in the shoeonhead person stream), but on the national friendship day stream on rekieta, you/he brought up barb having chris way into her late thirties/early fourties and that having an adverse effect on the end result.

So which is it? Indefinite flawless reproduction or decay of ovaries and womb? I don't think validating dead-eggers' copes is a healthy thing to do.
Josh is a farmer living in eastern europe with his adoptive pigeons. His job is running a daycare for retards to gossip about other retards. Nobody should listen to his advice, especially when it relates to procreation, since he is fat and I would not fuck him.
 
Josh is a farmer living in eastern europe with his adoptive pigeons. His job is running a daycare for retards to gossip about other retards. Nobody should listen to his advice, especially when it relates to procreation, since he is fat and I would not fuck him.
Josh is basically the corporeal manifestation of the tenacious American spirit. He could have given up countless times over the years and yet, he persists. He has eschewed a soulless corporate path in favor of one he genuinely enjoys. If nothing else, that is to be admired.
 
Sheesh, I didn't know this was such a sore spot here of all places. No wonder you compromise on accuracy on this subject.
Here's some food for thought though: It's not a good idea to outright live in denial of basic facts just because acknowledging them reflects badly upon us. Josh can acknowledge that being fat is unhealthy despite being fat himself and we can acknowledge that the optimal reproductive model is arranged marriage between mid-to-late teenagers despite currently not applying that model ourselves. Yes it means we failed as a collective. No that doesn't mean we should just deny it.
 
Back