- Joined
- Feb 28, 2015
i mean, least they bothered with some form of character developmentI recall @SiccDicc complaining that Sarah was written as a brash suffragist. Meanwhile, in the original, she only appeared blink twice and you'll miss her.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i mean, least they bothered with some form of character developmentI recall @SiccDicc complaining that Sarah was written as a brash suffragist. Meanwhile, in the original, she only appeared blink twice and you'll miss her.
>turn her into an unlikable cunti mean, least they bothered with some form of character development
wrong kind of character development i was talking about, but whatever>turn her into an unlikable cunt
>add more scenes of her being an unlikable cunt
>Tommy marries her despite her now being unlikable cunt (cause that's what happened in original game)
>she stays the same one-note unlikable cunt through the whole game
>"character development"
lmao, the only time she's not a wretched, unlikable cunt in demake is the pre-ending montage where she has 0 dialogue
less is more, especially when it comes to dogshit
That was her only character development.wrong kind of character development i was talking about, but whatever
That is quite an exaggeration. Sarah is upset when a Congressman gets whacked who (in Mafia's world) was instrumental in passing suffrage. It's not played like some gay virtue signaling thing like the suffragette missions in RDR2 (kill me), it's played more like her being forced to confront, if for a moment, that her people's lifestyle not only kills, not only kills nameless mooks or unfortunates, but might actually make the world worse. I think it was a very smart scene.I recall @SiccDicc complaining that Sarah was written as a brash suffragist. Meanwhile, in the original, she only appeared blink twice and you'll miss her.
May I ask what was the big deal with Sarah in the remake?>turn her into an unlikable cunt
>add more scenes of her being an unlikable cunt
>Tommy marries her despite her now being unlikable cunt (cause that's what happened in original game)
>she stays the same one-note unlikable cunt through the whole game
>"character development"
lmao, the only time she's not a wretched, unlikable cunt in demake is the pre-ending montage where she has 0 dialogue
less is more, especially when it comes to dogshit
It's a plotpoint that was added to the remake explicitly so that the character rewritten into an obnoxious cunt can talk about mah wymnz right to vote in a scene that didn't exist in the original game.It's not played like some gay virtue signaling thing
Did you somehow miss me saying she was an obnoxious cunt?May I ask what was the big deal with Sarah in the remake?
I DID miss the part where you elaborated your claim. She appears in what, a few cutscenes at that? IMO, I found Paulie to be obnoxious. His Mickey Mouse voice and schemes is tedious.Did you somehow miss me saying she was an obnoxious cunt?
Imagine shitting yourself to play Mafia III. Awkward doesn't begin to describe that. Was he a streamer or something?Regardless of your opinions on Mafia III, it's legacy will always be that of an autistic guy shitting his pants while his mom yells at him.
In the base game of Mafia 2 he isn't portrayed very well. He is sort of charming in that Mafia way, but he is pretty much the direct cause of every last nickle of suffering Vito endures and the game makes that very obvious. He is the one who gets Vito arrested and sent to war, he is the one who gets Vito involved in drugs, and he is the one who pisses off the triads by killing their boss. He also heavily considered wacking Vito at the end of the game.Joe is a sociopathic boor and I'd be happier if he was dead
She wasn't a hoe who sleeps with the first dude she has a conversation with.May I ask what was the big deal with Sarah in the remake?
How many Italian broads have you met?Did you somehow miss me saying she was an obnoxious cunt?
They turned her from a normal female character with a normal personality given the time period into a 21st century ideal of a stunning and brave queen. Gave her the Mario movie Peach treatment. There isn't even any relevant explanation in the story for why she became a boss bitch, she just is because fuck you, wamyn were always stronk.May I ask what was the big deal with Sarah in the remake?
Remake Paulie never came across that way to me, he came across more like a character you're supposed to pity because he quite literally has nothing going on outside of the life and even then he can't really handle the life either (which once again leads to some schizophrenic writing and characterization just like Tommy's which I've described in my previous post). In that aspect he reminds me of Paulie Walnuts, where it's often shown that outside of being a gangster he pretty much has nothing, no wife or family of his own and no real hobbies or anything like that either, the difference being that Sopranos Paulie doesn't have any regrets about doing any of that heinous gangster shit unlike Remake Paulie. Though with that Shrek-like face and Mickey Mouse voice I'm not surprised Remake Paulie can't get a wife.Now, she isn't the only character that was made worse in the remake. New Paulie is a psycho cunt, which isn't entirely out of character for him given his troubled nature, but his charming friendly side, which was very prominent in the old game, is hardly to be seen in the remake. He's just a callous prick most of the time. In the old game, 95% of the time you'd be interacting with a 'good' Paulie, and you'd mostly be hearing about the 'bad' Paulie from bits of Tom's narration or dialogue with other characters. Only in a very select few scenes would you see Paulie acting cruel, which is supposed to create this conflict of perception about his character. I always thought that was an example of really good writing. He's a character whom you really want to like, but as the story progresses it gives you more and more reasons not to.
Yeah but old Paulie had this exact same backstory going on. There were dialogues with Frank and Sarah who said this about him, even some scenes with Paulie himself complaining about how empty his life is and how tired he is of his existence being centered around the mob family. I'm glad this isn't lost in the remake because it's the centerpiece of his character but it's all that's really left of him, which is a waste. His resulting behavior is totally different, one-dimensional and generally shitty.Remake Paulie never came across that way to me, he came across more like a character you're supposed to pity because he quite literally has nothing going on outside of the life and even then he can't really handle the life either (which once again leads to some schizophrenic writing and characterization just like Tommy's which I've described in my previous post). In that aspect he reminds me of Paulie Walnuts, where it's often shown that outside of being a gangster he pretty much has nothing, no wife or family of his own and no real hobbies or anything like that either, the difference being that Sopranos Paulie doesn't have any regrets about doing any of that heinous gangster shit unlike Remake Paulie. Though with that Shrek-like face and Mickey Mouse voice I'm not surprised Remake Paulie can't get a wife.
You can watch all the cutscenes as a sort of movie. You'll be missing out on some ingame dialogue that takes place while driving or walking during missions, but it should give you a decent picture of the differences.Can watching the footage of OG Mafia give an idea of its story? I've never played the original; I cannot prove or disprove the character differences between the two.