Infected MAP/NOMAP community - "Virtuous Pedophiles" has a prodigy

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
3119967d0c said:
You see, this guy isn't like that gross meanie Epstein, who's into nasty shit like young girls with boobs. He's a pedophile.

It makes sense in his world.


Libertarians. EVERY! SINGLE! TIME!

OK, that aside, I'm jealous that this autistic pedo got to see Neil Peart smash out some killer drum solos and the grandma caterwaul and I didn't and now never will. Fuck that guy.


It's funny that they love this "wrong side of history" crap. Because when the inevitable reaction to stuff like this takes its course, they will be lucky if there is even left any historical record that they ever existed. Look at the difference between how a certain 20th century leader handled promoters of child transexualism and pedophilia like Magnus Hirschfeld, vs. how they dealt with harmless (though cuttingly-witted) lesbians like Gertrude Stein. The former was assaulted and exiled, their books burnt, their acolytes suppressed. The latter was left alone to get on with a normal life.


Indeed. These pedos are mostly male. How many of them take the simple step of pursuing a career where they live for long periods of time away from children? Working on an oil rig. Mining. There's options out there, but you still see a lot of these sick bastards talk about working in or aspiring to work in childcare in some manner. How many ensure that their outside pursuits involve as few children as possible? Probably even less.

Their actions prove they are not serious about their professed beliefs.
Click to expand...

This wrong side of history stuff is annoying to be honest. There won’t be history, you’re irrelevent.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: sixuglymidgets, DopeAddictKittenV2, ICraveDeath and 9 others
New article from our very own @yesthatanna

www.thepostmillennial.com

The bizarre world of tax-exempt pedophiles

Pedophile organizations have been trying to weasel their way into normalcy for a while. But did you know some are tax exempt?
www.thepostmillennial.com www.thepostmillennial.com

This author found that three organizations had been granted full IRS tax-exempt status while encouraging, advocating for the rights of, or working to dismantle important safeguards against pedophiles and their access to children.

The California-based organization Prostasia was given IRS tax exemption in 2018. While marketing itself as a children’s rights organization, Prostasia is a veritable grab-bag of causes surrounding sex and sexuality, but many believe it represents something far more sinister.

In Prostasia’s blog entries, “child protection” routinely ends up in the same sentences as “free speech,” “kink,” or “sex positivity.” The topics of ageplay, furries, hentai, and prostitution are spoken about no differently as, and often with no barrier between, child sexuality and child sexual abuse.
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: sixuglymidgets, Ellesse_warrior, Clockwork_PurBle and 13 others
I have no idea why this thread is not more active than it is. MAPs and their supporters are god awful, and the source of many hearty, superlative WTFs.

The entity known as Prostasia (its ED J. Malcom) reached out to TPM almost immediately after publication with a laundry list of complaints about my article, the single most strange being that Guy Hamilton-Smith, whom I provided receipts in the article as having been on the sex offender registry for the possession of child pornography, was NOT a pedophile, and that my suggestion that he was constituted defamation (J. Malcom is a lawyer, so I took this as a legal threat).

When I challenged him on this, restated the fact that GHS was on the publicly available sex offender registry for the possession of child pornography (where constantly renewing photos, addresses and all aliases must be listed for the next 20-some-odd years, I believe), he effectively said that it was perfectly common for an adult with a "psychologically normal sexuality" to commit sexual offences against children, and that wouldn't make them a pedophile.

I wish I were joking.
 

Attachments

  • JM.jpg
    JM.jpg
    33.9 KB · Views: 649
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: DopeAddictKittenV2, whiteboydiddy, Coach Kreeton Of All That and 19 others
Prostasia had this weird fucking article I've seen retweeted by various pedophiles and zoophiles on twitter (if this wasn't the exact article, it was something topically similar). http://archive.li/c8Fb3

It can be summed up that you shouldn't regulate children on the internet because apparently censorship is always bad no matter what, which is not true if you take more than a second to think about it, especially when we're talking about children of all people. It's common sense and proven many times that kids are influenced negatively by this content. Of course kids should know about violence, death and sex to some extent, but not by surfing the fucking internet at age 11.

What stood out to me personally was where they tried to make some gross joke about showing your toddler your fetishes. The article also has a paragraph where they literally say "Children are their own people". Where have I heard this before...?
sideofthematress said:
vifadf.png

So I found this little gem. So she claims not to want to be with children yet here she is justifying being with them.

It's like she is in waiting for children to come to her instead.
Click to expand...
This phrase speaks volumes about the kind of people they are when seeing the rest of their content. Interesting to note how they also want to teach kids sexual pleasure, intimacy and consent. Top this with their pedophile enabling ideologies, that's enough for you to come up with your own theories of what these freaks are up to.

Earlier on a pedophile asspatting post they made, I've sent an anonymous comment to them. The response I got was a passive-aggressive block of text full of mental gymnastics and exceptional logic. The weirder part is how quickly I got it, I remember it took like 5 minutes. TLDR; the reply boils down to "don't be a meaniepoopoohead, people who want to fuck toddlers are human too! they're just like you! we're a no-bullying zone! also having child abusers in your community is actually a beneficial thing!"

Screenshot 2019-09-21 at 00.26.34.png


Did you know that this article was written only a couple of moths after a "NOMAP" in the community groomed a 10 year old girl, called her a slut, emotionally and verbally abused her, and they also do not mention this at all? Just a fun fact ;)

Eit: My bad, I typed "weeks" instead of "months" but let's not pretend that the event's irrelevant and happened ages ago. Nobody should forget it.


PS. Who knew these'd be the kind of people behind the organization lol

Screenshot 2019-09-20 at 23.55.14.png
 
Last edited:
  • Horrifying
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: MeatRokket08, behavioral swamp thang, Clockwork_PurBle and 15 others
yesthatanna said:
he effectively said that it was perfectly common for an adult with a "psychologically normal sexuality" to commit sexual offences against children, and that wouldn't make them a pedophile.

I wish I were joking.
Click to expand...
What an incredibly bizarre argument for Malcolm to make. The argument that "Aktually, [x] is not a pedophile- he is an ephebophile, only attracted to post-pubescent girls" is already weak enough. By Guy's own admission, he spent at least five years jacking it to images of chldren at least as young as 14. He seems to be attempting to imply in that Reddit AMA (of course he is a self-described 'regular redditor' and Episcopalian) that he stuck to softcore stuff, but I would be surprised if that were the case.

And despite this Malcolm says Guy's "age of attraction is psychologically normal"? Incredible. A guy who is attracted to females from age 14-50 is not a mostly "psychologically normal" person, or any more "psychologically normal" than someone who is only attracted to 14-16 year olds. He's a guy who is at the very least attracted to 14 year olds and collected material featuring girls of that age or younger for years. He can't even complain about being the proverbial guy who "fucked one sheep"- he admits to having collected this material for years.

Instead of addressing that, Malcolm is just saying Guy will basically 'fuck anything that moves'. I will be interested to see how this 'pedophilia as pansexuality' argument plays out in future.

EDIT: According to 'Hiccaries' on the Prostasia forum, people only hate pedophiles because of 4chan. Another thing ruined by those dastardly 4chan incels.
https://archive.is/U9Hgc#selection-1033.0-1059.194
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: MeatRokket08, behavioral swamp thang, Clockwork_PurBle and 6 others
"10 years ago, If I said ‘‘Benny Rodriguez from the Sandlot or Ponyboy from the Outsiders was hekin cute’’ not a single person would have had a problem with that but now that’s child pornography."

:story: Holy shit Malcolm, are you this dense? People don't immediately think you're a pedophile for calling an underage character "cute", and if they do they're likely either paronoid or recalling trauma. But when you're a pedophile defender and constantly excuse every shit they do, then top that with the fact you're a grownass man, people will have suspicions and are allowed to not act nicely. They have every right to do so. Fuck off.

Edit: I'm exceptional, I thought the quote was from Malcolm and not someone else. I have to stop skimming.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
  • DRINK!
Reactions: sixuglymidgets, Elim Garak, Fuck you and your asspats and 10 others
PlumSyrup said:
Honest question, I'm wondering if anyone here has studied mental health who knows this.

Is there a reason that something like CBT can't help these people? No pun intended, I swear. I actually have wondered for awhile why people act like pedophilia is innate and untreatable. I would assume that frequent thoughts about having sex with children could be treated like any other intrusive thoughts, or that weird ideas about consent could be treated as any other cognitive distortion. I guess I don't understand why a depressed person's brain thinking things like "I'm a worthless, hopeless fuckup who deserves to die" is considered treatable, but pedophilia isn't.

Well, this is assuming they haven't hurt anybody. If they have, they need more than just therapy. But I'm talking in the case of people who say they can't change and it's no different from being straight or gay.
Click to expand...
CBT won't help these people because they don't want help

When people with depression and such go to therapy, it's because they're seeking relief. They want something to be different. MAPs think they are fine, but it's the WORLD that needs to change.

It's almost similar to a personality disorder, which are virtually impossible to treat. They think everyone else is wrong
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: sixuglymidgets, DopeAddictKittenV2, Elim Garak and 17 others
MementoMalum said:
View attachment 883080

Her twitter bio. I hate everything about AOA (age of attraction, I'm assuming). Why do you announce to the world you are attracted to 4 year old girls and 6 year old boys? Speaking of which, whats the cutoff line? Is a 6 year old boy just that much sexier than a 5 year old?

I'm asking questions to which I really don't want to know the answers.
Click to expand...
Thank you for sifting through the cesspool of Twitter. From what I've gleaned in this thread they're on all platforms. There's probably some overlap between them and loli steven universe mlp or they're trying too appeal to kid's. (they are mental children. But they need to alt 4.)
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Elim Garak, behavioral swamp thang, Clockwork_PurBle and 2 others
n33gr said:
Prostasia had this weird fucking article I've seen retweeted by various pedophiles and zoophiles on twitter (if this wasn't the exact article, it was something topically similar). http://archive.li/c8Fb3

It can be summed up that you shouldn't regulate children on the internet because apparently censorship is always bad no matter what, which is not true if you take more than a second to think about it, especially when we're talking about children of all people. It's common sense and proven many times that kids are influenced negatively by this content. Of course kids should know about violence, death and sex to some extent, but not by surfing the fucking internet at age 11.

What stood out to me personally was where they tried to make some gross joke about showing your toddler your fetishes. The article also has a paragraph where they literally say "Children are their own people". Where have I heard this before...?

This phrase speaks volumes about the kind of people they are when seeing the rest of their content. Interesting to note how they also want to teach kids sexual pleasure, intimacy and consent. Top this with their pedophile enabling ideologies, that's enough for you to come up with your own theories of what these freaks are up to.

Earlier on a pedophile asspatting post they made, I've sent an anonymous comment to them. The response I got was a passive-aggressive block of text full of mental gymnastics and exceptional logic. The weirder part is how quickly I got it, I remember it took like 5 minutes. TLDR; the reply boils down to "don't be a meaniepoopoohead, people who want to fuck toddlers are human too! they're just like you! we're a no-bullying zone! also having child abusers in your community is actually a beneficial thing!"

View attachment 942944

Did you know that this article was written only a couple of moths after a "NOMAP" in the community groomed a 10 year old girl, called her a slut, emotionally and verbally abused her, and they also do not mention this at all? Just a fun fact ;)

Eit: My bad, I typed "weeks" instead of "months" but let's not pretend that the event's irrelevant and happened ages ago. Nobody should forget it.


PS. Who knew these'd be the kind of people behind the organization lol

View attachment 942899
Click to expand...
OY VEY! This is the organization he's from.


oyvey.PNG


From the bit I can find on her, she's basically a muh six gorillion herald for hire.


Archive: https://archive.fo/Jh2q5
 
  • Informative
  • Horrifying
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Elim Garak, Plasmapheresis, Coach Kreeton Of All That and 4 others
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: sixuglymidgets, MeatRokket08, Clockwork_PurBle and 3 others
I pointed this out in another “pedophile support group” thread, but basically, support groups/communities for pedophiles that don’t have serious moderation/oversight from non-pedo professionals are very dangerous. It’s the same reason why alcoholism and drug addiction support groups are run by a sober person who’s either never had problems with addiction or has been clean for many years. If you only have troubled people or they’re the ones in charge, they’ll naturally make excuses for bad behavior and resist correcting themselves. I can already see this going on here.

MetalParakeet said:
CBT won't help these people because they don't want help

When people with depression and such go to therapy, it's because they're seeking relief. They want something to be different. MAPs think they are fine, but it's the WORLD that needs to change.

It's almost similar to a personality disorder, which are virtually impossible to treat. They think everyone else is wrong
Click to expand...

I actually do feel bad for pedophiles who genuinely want help and do everything they can to avoid children. It’s not their fault their brains are all fucked up, and if they’re getting treatment and working hard to overcome it I say more power to them.

The really dangerous pedophiles are the ones who insist that they’re just misunderstood and the world needs to change to accommodate them and not the other way around. They’re not interested in reforming or changing or learning to control their urges, they think they’re in the right and society just needs to catch up. They don’t understand that everyone is disgusted with them for a reason.

I especially hate it when they compare themselves to the LGBT movement; the LGBT movement has succeeded because most people realized they shouldn’t care if two consenting adults enter a relationship. Pedophilia doesn’t involve two adults or consent, so of course people are up in arms about it.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: sixuglymidgets, Elim Garak, Actually Christian Bale and 20 others
3119967d0c said:
Prostasia focusing on the important things- can you use Bing to find animated toddlercon rape gifs?
View attachment 948291
https://archive.li/IYJej

If you can't, that's censorship.
Click to expand...
If you're gonna whack it to lolicon, go right the fuck ahead, I really don't give a shit. But if you're gonna try to find it on Bing fucking image search you deserve to be shot.

If you try to find it on Bing image search, fail, and proceed to tell everybody about it? Shooting is not enough.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: sixuglymidgets, DopeAddictKittenV2, Elim Garak and 14 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back