Marijan Š Šiklić Article

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Holden said:
he still claims that i have these [violent] fantasies
Click to expand...
I don't. The wording is (and has always been as far as I remember):
Without being prompted, he indulges in extremely violent phantasies
Click to expand...
And this is exactly what you do. And as of late, these phantasies (often) feature horses as well, for whatever reasons.
But it is kind of strange that you are so adamant in denying these phantasies I never claimed you to have, isn't it?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Positron and Yog-Spergoth
Holden said:
an example is the violent fantasies nonsense. i said many times that violence is necessary for all non-seducers like drinking water and taking out garbage. but you don't fantasize about these, do you? the worst crime to a modern woman is to be treated as anything than dirt. but he still claims that i have these fantasies because he's... insane.
Click to expand...

fantasy noun fan·ta·sy \ˈfan-tə-sē, -zē\
Something that is produced by the imagination : an idea about doing something that is far removed from normal reality.

Your proposed treatment to "modern women" is nothing but imagination. Therefore it absolutely fits the dictionary definition of "fantasy".
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Ti-99/4A
Positron said:
Your proposed treatment to "modern women" is nothing but imagination.
Click to expand...
Than it's not my violent fantasy but a fantasy of how it is done. The way it is written now claims I have such fantasies. Which, of course, you won't understand and he won't understand either. Aside from the fact you're promoting something much worse - seduction. The best way to get modern Western women is the second way - incredibly vicious beatings, which could also be done by non-scum. Everybody can use their hands but to seduce you need to be utter, utter scum.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Ti-99/4A and Trombonista
Holden said:
Than it's not my violent fantasy but a fantasy of how it is done. The way it is written now claims I have such fantasies. Which, of course, you won't understand and he won't understand either. Aside from the fact you're promoting something much worse - seduction. The best way to get modern Western women is the second way - incredibly vicious beatings, which could also be done by non-scum. Everybody can use their hands but to seduce you need to be utter, utter scum.
Click to expand...

I think most people would argue that beating women is worse than whatever vague thing you call seduction. The only solace I have is that any woman you try to beat would snap you like piece of straw in a windtunnel.

Edit: Marijan, have you ever followed the Deagle forums?
 
I took a look at that lunatic's article. For example, he claims that it's a paradox that sex is something men and want and women give but men still created societies. Why would that be a paradox? Because he is insane, that's why.

Then he claims "women overthrew men". Hahaha. It's men who gave women power.

And that's just the beginning. A bunch of nonsense, written by an insane person.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Ti-99/4A
Holden said:
I took a look at that lunatic's article. For example, he claims that it's a paradox that sex is something men and want and women give but men still created societies. Why would that be a paradox? Because he is insane, that's why.

Then he claims "women overthrew men". Hahaha. It's men who gave women power.

And that's just the beginning. A bunch of nonsense, written by an insane person.
Click to expand...

I guess you're right. That's not a paradox, no.

Can you explain what you mean by "men gave women power"? Women have always had their own power, no?

If, as you say, consent is meaningless, wouldn't seduction and rape be essentially the same?
 
Yog-Spergoth said:
I guess you're right. That's not a paradox, no.
Click to expand...
If true, I applaud you for your sincerity.

Yog-Spergoth said:
Can you explain what you mean by "men gave women power"? Women have always had their own power, no?
Click to expand...
Yes, women always had many forms of power but men gave them political power in the current form. Women didn't overthrow anything. All declining societies were inclined to give women some of that power, it's just that most weren't democracies by the time they started collapsing.

In other words, he is an idiot. Horse would write a good article but that lunatic is just insane.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Ti-99/4A
Holden said:
If true, I applaud you for your sincerity.


Yes, women always had many forms of power but men gave them political power in the current form. Women didn't overthrow anything. All declining societies were inclined to give women some of that power, it's just that most weren't democracies by the time they started collapsing.

In other words, he is an idiot. Horse would write a good article but that lunatic is just insane.
Click to expand...

Are you saying that women's right tie directly into the fall of democracy?
 
Then he claims that TAC were my enemies before meeting fschmidt. I met him in 2009 and coined the term in 2013. So just more nonsense from a lunatic.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Ti-99/4A
Yog-Spergoth said:
Are you saying that women's right tie directly into the fall of democracy?
Click to expand...
No, just that the societies that declined abolished democracy (or never had any at all) before they started collapsing, so they never instituted women's suffrage.

The crazy German man writing the article believes woman had a role in this- LOL !
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Ti-99/4A
Holden said:
No, just that the societies that declined abolished democracy (or never had any at all) before they started collapsing, so they never instituted women's suffrage.

The crazy German man writing the article believes woman had a role in this- LOL !
Click to expand...

Do you have any proof the US has abolished democracy? It's just hard to believe because it doesn't seem like something we would stand for, you know?

Also, @Cephalometrist is German? Are you sure? He types very well.
 
then he says i endorse videos of molyneux while being unemployed and that this is hypocritical - not in the least, since molyneux doesn't understand that taxes pay for me never having a gf. crazy german boy simply refuses to take that into account.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Ti-99/4A
then about my methods - who cares how these men i present are portrayed. also, i presented more than one or two. with the marriage thing, he claims that my statements aren't backed up and makes his own conclusion of the results, which is also completely one sided and backed up by nothing.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Ti-99/4A
about my methods of discussion - he makes it seem i never reply to anybody's point at all. which is insane and just another lie.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Ti-99/4A
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back