Mega Rad Gun Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I find full auto overrated, a 9mm carbine in full auto would be controllable but even 5.56 goes all over the place imho.
 
troon patrol said:
If you were granted one NFA cheat, as in you could have any number of short barreled rifles, OR suppressors or full auto but only one what would you choose?

I'd probably go unlimited suppressors.
Click to expand...
Suppressors are the most practical, though I'd go with full auto weapons because I'd like to collect authentic military tech (and not just semi-auto replicas).
It's not NFA, but a hidden choice is to repeal the Russian import ban.
 
MrJokerRager said:
Some of them want microstamping for cops now.
Click to expand...
Anyone who knows anything about "microstamping" already knows this but I'm going to go on a bit of a sperg rant for those who don't.
"Microstamping"
Does
Not
Exist
"Microstamping" does not exist, it has never existed and it most likely will never exist. There has never been a single firing pin engraved with "microstamping technology" because ""microstamping technology" does not exist outside of the realm of paper and patents. These Anti-gun retards campaign for and have actually signed into law bills requiring non-existent technology to be applied to firearms. IIRC the patent for the concept of "microstamping" was granted to some Small Seattle tech company in 2007 or so and nothing has ever come of it. Even if "microstamping" was actually a real technology and not a pie in the sky theoretical concept it could literally be defeated with a scrap of sandpaper from your grandfather's toolbox, because for those who do not know, "microstamping" is a theoretical concept that involves engraving firing pins with microscopic imprints that are entirely unique (which is another reason why the entire concept is fucking stupid, if a manufacturer makes 100,000 guns per year they would need to somehow either create or be issued 100,000 unique imprints that can fit on the tip of a firing pin) that would leave identifying marks on the primers of spent cartridge cases. So not only does the technology not exist, it could be defeated with sandpaper, changing your firing pin or simply use a revolver, hell fire 100 rounds through your microstamped gun and the imprint would probably be obliterated. Even if the tech was magic and was undefeatable outside of using a revolver or sandpaper the government would need to spend billions upon billions of dollars training thousands of technicians in it's usage in addition to buying a hell of a lot of high power microscopes and even then because cops are fucking stupid and niggers are smart enough to dump their guns (which are increasingly Polymer 80's and pretty soon, 3D Printed and usually stolen if not homemade) it wouldn't do all that much
 
Last edited:
AGPinochet said:
Anyone who knows anything about "microstamping" already knows this but I'm going to go on a bit of a sperg rant for those who don't.
"Microstamping"
Does
Not
Exist
"Microstamping" does not exist, it has never existed and it most likely will never exist. There has never been a single firing pin engraved with "microstamping technology" because ""microstamping technology" does not exist outside of the realm of paper and patents. These Anti-gun retards campaign for and have actually signed into law bills requiring non-existent technology to be applied to firearms. IIRC the patent for the concept of "microstamping" was granted to some Small Seattle tech company in 2007 or so and nothing has ever come of it. Even if "microstamping" was actually a real technology and not a pie in the sky theoretical concept it could literally be defeated with a scrap of sandpaper from your grandfather's toolbox, because for those who do not know, "microstamping" is a theoretical concept that involves engraving firing pins with microscopic imprints that are entirely unique (which is another reason why the entire concept is fucking stupid, if a manufacturer makes 100,000 guns per year they would need to somehow either create or be issued 100,000 unique imprints that can fit on the tip of a firing pin) that would leave identifying marks on the primers of spent cartridge cases. So not only does the technology not exist, it could be defeated with sandpaper, changing your firing pin or simply use a revolver, hell fire 100 rounds through your microstamped gun and the imprint would probably be obliterated. Even if the tech was magic and was undefeatable outside of using a revolver or sandpaper the government would need to spend billions upon billions of dollars training thousands of technicians in it's usage in addition to buying a hell of a lot of high power microscopes and even then because cops are fucking stupid and niggers are smart enough to dump their guns (which are increasingly Polymer 80's and pretty soon, 3D Printed) it wouldn't do all that much
Click to expand...
Not to mention what happens if your firing pin breaks? Are you going to make manufacturers replace them forever? That idea is so retarded.
 
AGPinochet said:
Anyone who knows anything about "microstamping" already knows this but I'm going to go on a bit of a sperg rant for those who don't.
"Microstamping"
Does
Not
Exist
"Microstamping" does not exist, it has never existed and it most likely will never exist. There has never been a single firing pin engraved with "microstamping technology" because ""microstamping technology" does not exist outside of the realm of paper and patents. These Anti-gun retards campaign for and have actually signed into law bills requiring non-existent technology to be applied to firearms. IIRC the patent for the concept of "microstamping" was granted to some Small Seattle tech company in 2007 or so and nothing has ever come of it. Even if "microstamping" was actually a real technology and not a pie in the sky theoretical concept it could literally be defeated with a scrap of sandpaper from your grandfather's toolbox, because for those who do not know, "microstamping" is a theoretical concept that involves engraving firing pins with microscopic imprints that are entirely unique (which is another reason why the entire concept is fucking stupid, if a manufacturer makes 100,000 guns per year they would need to somehow either create or be issued 100,000 unique imprints that can fit on the tip of a firing pin) that would leave identifying marks on the primers of spent cartridge cases. So not only does the technology not exist, it could be defeated with sandpaper, changing your firing pin or simply use a revolver, hell fire 100 rounds through your microstamped gun and the imprint would probably be obliterated. Even if the tech was magic and was undefeatable outside of using a revolver or sandpaper the government would need to spend billions upon billions of dollars training thousands of technicians in it's usage in addition to buying a hell of a lot of high power microscopes and even then because cops are fucking stupid and niggers are smart enough to dump their guns (which are increasingly Polymer 80's and pretty soon, 3D Printed) it wouldn't do all that much
Click to expand...
Tell that the Chink or Gook in the California legislature that keeps pushing for it. And the California courts not striking it down because it's still law even though the technology does not exist.

Repealing the Chinese Exclusiin Act was a mistake in hindsight.
 
Cpl. Long Dong Silver said:
Not to mention what happens if your firing pin breaks?
Click to expand...
Shhhhhh don't try to apply logic to the thing that doesn't exist yet anti-gunners love, but maybe issue you a new firing pin with the same imprint?
Another theoretical, assume that you live in a Bizzaro world version of the US in which microstamping is a real technology and you get pulled over by a cop, you have a gun on you and the cop has the legal right to inspect your firearm's microstamp. How is he supposed to do that? with his trusty pocket-electron microscope? So the non-existent tech only really works on dumped guns which are as I said previously, either stolen or self manufactured.
 
Last edited:
MrJokerRager said:
How does the Ruger AR-556 or the Springfield Saint compared to the M&P Sport 2?
Click to expand...
Some of the earlier M&Ps didn't have a forward assist, the rifle used by Nicholas Cruz started to fail as it heated up and he eventually had to give up when he couldn't close the bolt.

The current M&Ps have a forward assist but I'm not sure if that's true of the entire production line or just some of them.

Of the three I'd probably go with the Ruger, it's typical overbuilt Ruger engineering.

Personally I think the best AR15 value on the market is the Ruger AR556 MPR. It's got pretty much everything you'd want on a modern AR15 right out of the box and for just a shade over $800.
 
Last edited:
Even the boomers in the late 2000s gun forums pointed out that criminals would just pick up casings in ranges and contaminate the crime scenes.
Badungus Kabungus said:
I'd rig up some kind of hydraulic arm and a harness like the Smart Gun in Aliens. Damn, that would be fun.
Click to expand...
Shit if we're going there I'd mount the hydraulic arm on a helicopter and run a business where people can pay to act as Apache gunners against junk cars in the desert.
 
ShortBusDriver said:
Some of the earlier M&Ps didn't have a forward assist, the rifle used by Nicholas Cruz started to fail as it heated up and he eventually had to give up when he couldn't close the bolt.

The current M&Ps have a forward assist but I'm not sure if that's true of the entire production line or just some of them.

Of the three I'd probably go with the Ruger, it's typical overbuild Ruger engineering.

Personally I think the best AR15 value on the market is the Ruger AR556 MPR. It's got pretty much everything you'd want on a modern AR15 right out of the box and for just a shade over $800.
Click to expand...
I'd also look closely at the Ruger if I was buying an off the shelf AR. That said, I have a feeling that the Ruger lowers are Aero parts with different markings - they have the same threaded hole for the nylon-tipped anti-wobble set screw that Aero uses on their Gen 2 lowers.
 
Has a yone here actually made a NFA trust?

Does it really add a degree of anonymity to owning NFA items?
 
TerminalTryHard said:
Has a yone here actually made a NFA trust?

Does it really add a degree of anonymity to owning NFA items?
Click to expand...
No, you're still going to have to be identifiable as the fiduciary. They are particularly useful if you plan on leaving NFA items to a loved one after you pass away, or if you want to share the firearm with a group, but it doesn't get you out of many rules.
 
Last edited:
WhatInTheActualFuck said:
Ruger lowers are Aero parts with different markings - they have the same threaded hole for the nylon-tipped anti-wobble set screw that Aero uses on their Gen 2 lowers.
Click to expand...
that's because Ruger contracts with various other companies to make up production shortages, especially during startup of a new product or when moving production equipment. it's why "OEM" exists. it's not more sinister than that.
 
Club Sandwich said:
that's because Ruger contracts with various other companies to make up production shortages, especially during startup of a new product or when moving production equipment. it's why "OEM" exists. it's not more sinister than that.
Click to expand...
I wasn't trying to imply any malice - if anything, giving me Aero parts is a positive thing. I like Aero parts because they're well-made and very consistent.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom