Mega Rad Gun Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1000042601.jpg


I heard horrible things about the sr556, but I have to say, I am a big fan of it so far. Its a bit heavy, but it doesn't jump much, and so far has ran flawlessly (with the exception of when I tried to run a busted theramelt mag in it. Shooting it today put out like 2.5in groups at 100yds.
 
wax/coating stuff they put on the cases
.22LR is externally lubricated and always has been. however this lubrication is not needed if the powder is clean burning (which is what the "wax" is on thunderbolt and some others). it can be removed with some 70% alcohol or paint thinner and a paint brush if you don't want it, which is what i do when i want to use it in a picky gun.
 
.22LR is externally lubricated and always has been. however this lubrication is not needed if the powder is clean burning (which is what the "wax" is on thunderbolt and some others). it can be removed with some 70% alcohol or paint thinner and a paint brush if you don't want it, which is what i do when i want to use it in a picky gun.
See, I've never experienced lubricated 22 on the 22 I shoot. Mostly cause I use federal auto match as my default ammo. I can't remember it being on blazers either, but to be fair I haven't paid much attention to that. I just know Aguila is so heavily coated it makes even my bolt guns stick.
 
See, I've never experienced lubricated 22 on the 22 I shoot. Mostly cause I use federal auto match as my default ammo. I can't remember it being on blazers either, but to be fair I haven't paid much attention to that. I just know Aguila is so heavily coated it makes even my bolt guns stick.
it's there, but typically not as thick or is a spray polymer which is very thin and doesn't gum up. a similar spray polymer is used in eastern bloc 7.62x39mm ammo pretty commonly. automatch only lubricated the lead round nose (LRN) as they used cheaper powder that was a bit dirtier than what was used in federal champion which, because of cleaner powder and using better lead alloy bullets, only needed very little external lubrication. the lubricant was to offer better extraction in revolvers, repeaters (pump, lever, et c) and bolt action rifles. automatics have a higher cadence of fire and tended to gum up with cheaper powder faster.

old lubricant on cheap lead bullets would dry and become flaky while the lead turned white. this combo created lead frosting:
1724482478721.png

it can be wiped off with alcohol or any keytone like kerosene, acetone, et c. but bone dry unlubricated .22 LRN with cheap bullets will very quickly foul a bore with leading and can result in stuck cases. there isn't a lot of rim to use to grab onto and yank it out after all, and it's hollow too...

plated tends to avoid a lot of these problems. in the specific case of aguila plated (or really any wax you want to remove) you can melt it off with the trash bag method or with paint thinners and a brush, et c. don't like a little work stop you from cheap ammo.
 
automatch only lubricated the lead round nose (LRN) as they used cheaper powder that was a bit dirtier than what was used in federal champion which, because of cleaner powder and using better lead alloy bullets, only needed very little external lubrication. the lubricant was to offer better extraction in revolvers, repeaters (pump, lever, et c) and bolt action rifles. automatics have a higher cadence of fire and tended to gum up with cheaper powder faster.

old lubricant on cheap lead bullets would dry and become flaky while the lead turned white. this combo created lead frosting:
View attachment 6341679
Hmm. I've been shooting for years and never knew this. Thanks for the info. I knew some of the eley match stuff I had when I shot competition was lubed, but I figured that was for better function in match guns. Thanks for the info on that.
 
Hmm. I've been shooting for years and never knew this. Thanks for the info. I knew some of the eley match stuff I had when I shot competition was lubed, but I figured that was for better function in match guns. Thanks for the info on that.
the secret sauce is that lead round nose lubrication has been a thing for over a century and you'll find similar info for .38 S&W or .38 Long Colt and other olderer school revolver rounds, .45-70 moose rounds, good old mk 1 martini henry where they had both paper-patching and lubrication grooves at the same time... that's why old lead bullets had a lubrication groove - for easier cleaning and reliable extraction, and for rifles, many such grooves. black powder is very very dirty and that lubrication not only in helping seat a bullet into a case (crimped or cannelured) but when fired, helped "wipe" loose black powder and left a thing coating that made it easier to clean. really, as firing the bullet was a very high pressure situation and cast lead bullets, even hard cast lead (with antimony), would elongate a bullet a bit, distorting and smearing the lubricant in the groove (or coating the bullet itself) down the bore. this both sealed the bore better, helped protect the lead from casual weathering or moisture creeping into the powder, and during firing actively "wipe" or "squee-gee" out some unburnt powder that would result in leading or fouling too quickly with long strings of shots. air would be evacuated and drawn out following the bullet immediately after firing, taking with it loose powder and drying the lubricant for the next shot, eventually "coating" the bore very thinly with easy-to-clean lubricant.

1724483427226.png
1724484126992.jpeg
1724484193370.png
1724484288656.png


but not all lubricants are made the same, and cheap dirty powder will be cheap and dirty and the high volume of fire available to an automatic will overpower the primitive technology of lubricated bullets. .22LR is a very old round and so has some old tech still in common use, even with better tech available or just flat out cleaner chemicals (powder) and metallurgy (cheap plating, epoxy coating, et c).
 
Last edited:
black powder is very very dirty and that lubrication not only in helping seat a bullet into a case (crimped or cannelured) but when fired, helped "wipe" loose black powder and left a thing coating that made it easier to clean. really, as firing the bullet was a very high pressure situation and cast lead bullets, even hard cast lead (with antimony), would elongate a bullet a bit, distorting and smearing the lubricant in the groove (or coating the bullet itself) down the bore. this both sealed the bore better, helped protect the lead from casual weathering or moisture creeping into the powder, and during firing actively "wipe" or "squee-gee" out some unburnt powder that would result in leading or fouling too quickly with long strings of shots. air would be evacuated and drawn out following the bullet immediately after firing, taking with it loose powder and drying the lubricant for the next shot, eventually "coating" the bore very thinly with easy-to-clean lubricant.
See I knew it was a thing with black powder (and the older revolver rounds), just never seen it on 22lr. Anyways, I gotta take care of some stuff, chat later.
 
See I knew it was a thing with black powder (and the older revolver rounds), just never seen it on 22lr. Anyways, I gotta take care of some stuff, chat later.
yeah, np; the .22LR dates back to those old black powder and bullet lube days (which are sort of still a thing in cowboy action or reloaders), so the lubrication for it is unsurprisingly still around, but few think about it. as plated .22LR become more common and clean burning smokeless powder was more affordable in bulk, it stopped being a requirement and more was just a way to keep using old dirty powder recipes.
 
2.) how legitimate of a proposition does that sound like? I remember reading somewhere on here that high quality NVGs aren’t cheap and the technology for Made in USA ones are proprietary secret squirrel shit.
Depends on the price.

A "good" gen 3(basically PVS14) is going to run you $2000+ at a minimum.

Then you need a helmet to mount it on.
Then you need the actual mounts to mount it on the helmet.

So all in all youre looking at around $3000 to get started in the nvg game unless you go with something beat up or old.

I miss the good old days of 20 some cents per round M855.
The fucking feels man. Last time I bought 7.62x39 it was 11-12cpr shipped. Hadnt shot my basic neutered ban era WASR10 in forever so had a bit on hand but with picking up a PSA AKP + deadair wolverine man does it suck. That setup is fun to shoot.
 
Also i forgot youll need a laser. $1000 there unless you wanna roll the dice on a $250 somogear.

Ive thought about picking up a PVS14 myself. Already have a helmet and a few mounts thanks to my time in the Bhutan Air Force and I was autistic enough to buy a somogear peq15 knock off.
5.56 (especially out of a 20" barrel) is way more devastating of a round that 7.62x39. It doesn't matter what kind of somalian bathtub meth those niggers were on in Mogadishu, if they got hit with a 5.56 round center mass out of an m16a2, they went down. I'd be willing to bet the 556 suffers from the same problem 30 carbine did in Korea - soldiers just missed their target and blamed the gun instead of their own marksmanship. You had guys claiming 30 carbine was so weak it would bounce off of thick chinese winter coats. We know with hindsight these accoounts were most patently false, and a result of prideful men not wanting to look like a bad shot.
Velocity likely the culprit imo.

5.56mm is very devastating, a single hit from it center mass(really just about any modern rifle cartridge) at point blank and at a minimum youre disabled and a very good chance going to die. The problem is 5.56mm needs to fragment for that to happen which means it needs to be going fast enough. M193 will reliably fragment above 2700-2800fps below that it doesnt fragment so you just end up poking a 5.56mm hole through someones body, not very effective;

1724486635045.gif


Out of a 16 inch barrel, around 100m is where you start to drop below 2700fps. Considering the delta boys would have been rocking 11.5 inch ARs, that combined with the skinnies high as a kite you likely end up with the outcome they did.
 
Last edited:
Considering the delta boys would have been rocking 11.5 inch ARs
in the 90's i was part of standby forces for the situations happening in Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, and Sierra Lione to extraction of VIPs out of some dangerous goings on. some of the guys i was with were there in Mogadishu in 1993 and we were talking kit a little and i had a fairly early M4 (with 3rd burst). as per them, almost entirely Colt 723s and 727s (14.5" barrel) with a few CAR-15 Commandos (11.5" barrel) and even some XM177's (10.5 mostly with grenade ring) thrown in and that having full auto on tap was handy in urban fighting purely from volume of fire until you could get an M60 or SAW on target. regular infantry had M16A2 with a few A1E1's unless you were activated NG or armor where you had some vietnam or even korean war stuff. the short carbines were not common even among cool guys.
 
Last edited:
I'm thinking about actually going NFA and getting a can for my Glock but are there any decent 9mm supressors that aren't $800?
Silencerco omega 9k
Going to be some hard lessons learned, but Feds aren't people, so fuck'em.
It’s where the bullets go that’s the issue. Interesting that they went this way after the Sig 320 controversy.
imagine the future of inner city gang warfare when you can buy a shitty open bolt SMG for $50
We see it now with the Glock switches.
 
Parts freezing is probably the only real issue with the AR. The mag release, bolt release and selector are prone to freezing in place if water find its way into these areas in freezing temps. But it does take a certain number of circumstances to achieve this, and it's very rare. I've shot in temps down to 15F but have never had any parts freeze, probably because I've never dumped water on my gun like in some of the torture tests people have done on YouTube.

Other than potential cold weather issues, if you go for a swim with your AR, your gas tube might get filled with water and the next round you fire won't cycle the bolt, but the next round should fire fine after you rack the next round into the chamber.
In the end, it's about training. In cold weather, you should use lube to an extent. When it get's cold enough, the lube is replaced with paraffin/kerosine.

The benefit of the AK system is the large controls, that you can easily apply force to.
 
Im just wondering why no one has made a kel tec sub 2k that DOESN'T fold yet. The folding mechanism on the sub2k is clearly the biggest weakness. It adds complexity, fragility, and cost. You could make a sub 2k cheaper, stonger, and simpler by just making it a straight tube with plastic fittings. And you could probably sell it for 200$.
That's basically what the Hi-Point carbine is

1724502339259.png

Also all of those carbine conversion kits that get made for Glocks.
 
Funny, I've been looking at a 1911 lately and wondering about the difference between a 70 and 80. The one I wanted is only offered in series 70, and I wasn't sure of the implications. Sounds like I'm safe to get one as long as I'm not a total retard.

... so that's out.
 
7.62x39 is outdated junk that the russians dont even fuck with anymore. Muh reliabilitah is 60 year old boomer fud lore. This is all evident in the fact that military procurment around the world favors the AR pattern (see the chinese qbz-191

Russia and many others still use 7.62x39 as it's stupid cheap and still reasonably effective.

The QBZ-191 is a gas piston driven rifle with ..... A reciprocating right side charging handle 😳

See here https://youtu.be/bjsQ--XSviY?si=Ya2WLYYKmFXlu8Zo

And here: https://youtu.be/n5WoYo24QVU?si=6SZweLjTbTfFcq1N

The AR magwell and button is fast to use no doubt. It is also one of the few actual drawbacks of the rifle. You can over insert AR mags, and push button releases are prone to freezing when in cold climates. There is a reason that pretty much everyone else did a latch type of release on their guns before STANAG was a thing. And now everyone uses STANAG because... everyone uses it. Not because it's good.

And I'm not really coming at this from an AK angle. Like pick any 5.56 magazine system aside from STANAG, they are better. G36, FAMAS, SIG-550...

But not so much better that it would justify not using STANAG. We are gasping at straws here.

The Magpul Pmag and better followers on metal mags essentially fixed 99% of issues with STANAGs
 
Arguing AK vs AR is like arguing mid-tier AR vs high-tier AR. Yeah one is objectively better but the margin is so small you probably aren't good of a shooter for it to matter.
 
Arguing AK vs AR is like arguing mid-tier AR vs high-tier AR. Yeah one is objectively better but the margin is so small you probably aren't good of a shooter for it to matter.
It’s one of those arguments that never dies because people love to argue about gear.

AR vs AK
Piston vs DI
9mm vs 45
Red dot vs irons
Red dot vs LPVO
Flashlights
Slings
Optic height
Etc….
 
View attachment 6341642

I heard horrible things about the sr556, but I have to say, I am a big fan of it so far. Its a bit heavy, but it doesn't jump much, and so far has ran flawlessly (with the exception of when I tried to run a busted theramelt mag in it. Shooting it today put out like 2.5in groups at 100yds.
it is not orthodox, but i have always liked piston ARs, which is why ive been interested in the sr556. then again i also think 7.62x39 ARs are interesting and would consider buying one. only thing i dont like is qaud rails. always hated them. give me a good ol' A1 handgaurd. also include the carry handle. i just really love the look of those old Vietnam M-16s
 
Back
Top Bottom