Mega Rad Gun Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Lastly some leathery old fella has created a drop in FRT system that allows you to retain your (potentially modified) stock trigger system
After watching the videos the manufacturer posted about this drop-in piece, I'm pretty impressed. Mil-spec triggers might require some modification, but it works with Geissele triggers just fine, and LaRue triggers only require you to shave down part of the drop-in. Depending on the triggers you have in your ARs, you might be able to buy just one or two of these and swap them between all your ARs. $238 a piece, according to their website.
 
I've seen a couple of guys now who, after picking up a VP9 damn near refuse to touch any other handgun. I'm honestly both curious and a tad concerned.

I've put probably ~500 rounds through a friend's VP9 now and I just dont understand why people like it so much.
It shoots like a Glock with a marginally better trigger. it consistently fails to lock back on an empty mag when I use it, which isn't an issue with any other pistol I've used.
I'd chalk the malfunctions up to me, but even if it worked with zero malfunctions I'd still be convinced it was for people with more money than sense.
The failure to lock back is you riding the slide stop.

The VP9 comes from the factory how I would like a striker gun to be. Good trigger, interchangeable grip panels, durable finish.

Coming from a Glock, the VP9 doesn’t get destroyed by my sweat, and I can make the grip bigger to fit my hands.

As far as cost they are very similar to Glock, and you can regularly find them used for $400-$500.
 
I am looking at a Model 29-2 8 3/8in and a Model 57 8 3/8. Which one should I get? 44 and 41 magnum. I have never owned either cartridge before but I've always wanted a 29, not because of dirty harry but mad max.
I've got a 29-2 with a 6.5" barrel. That thing is a chonker and I bet you the longer barrel on the model you're looking at doesn't help anything. I'm not trying to dissuade you or anything. When was this one manufactured? If it's an older model with the firing pin on the hammer, I'd recommend getting some snap caps for dry fire practice.

They're well made, sturdy weapons. I've put over 1200 rounds through mine since getting it in 2019 and only now is the cylinder a tiny bit looser. I bought some parts from Power Custom so I'm set for whenever something might need to be replaced.
 
After watching the videos the manufacturer posted about this drop-in piece, I'm pretty impressed. Mil-spec triggers might require some modification, but it works with Geissele triggers just fine, and LaRue triggers only require you to shave down part of the drop-in. Depending on the triggers you have in your ARs, you might be able to buy just one or two of these and swap them between all your ARs. $238 a piece, according to their website.
I definitely like the way things are moving, but that thing is too damn expensive for what it is. Seeing his block of plastic he was using as a work rest, I certainly wouldn't play that much for a Delrin trigger piece. Cool thing, but drop it $100-150 and then I'd be interested. A spare leg thing would be nice too
Good on him for going old fashioned with payment/calling him, that should have been an option from the beginning with FRTs, and really any gun stuff.

The Hoffman Super Safety seems like a better option due to being selectable, stainless steel, and 1/3 the price to ¢15 even with fancy filament. Swapping the Regulator is fine and all, but it'd take only one more pin to just totally swap lowers. It also sounds like this thing isn't the most compatible, whereas the Hoffman seems much more versatile.
 
BRB, about to sell my kidney for Ruger's new 10mm pcc. Seriously though, sick.
My fellow gun niggers what's even the point of the SIG spear? I see no advantage to it unless you are fighting a large population heavily armed with M4-compatible weapons in a geologically diverse area and you don't want the "enemy" to resupply. I can only think of one country where that's the case.
View attachment 6415055
MAGA country in case you are retarded.
It's for Level IV body armor. That's it. Big army is spooked about China outfitting entire battalions with the stuff, so they want a counter.
 
It's for Level IV body armor. That's it. Big army is spooked about China outfitting entire battalions with the stuff, so they want a counter.
so this is the real life equivalent to the pulse gun from fallout new vegas? not quite as sexy or fun.

the pulse gun was an experimental weapons developed out of fear that the chinese would deploy large numbers of soldiers in heavy power armor.

My fellow gun niggers what's even the point of the SIG spear?
if anime mormon is correct, that it is designed for level IV, then it is a gun made for null, he has mentioned his fear of a level IV armored tranny army breaking into his swamp.
 
so this is the real life equivalent to the pulse gun from fallout new vegas? not quite as sexy or fun.

the pulse gun was an experimental weapons developed out of fear that the chinese would deploy large numbers of soldiers in heavy power armor.


if anime mormon is correct, that it is designed for level IV, then it is a gun made for null, he has mentioned his fear of a level IV armored tranny army breaking into his swamp.
Basically yeah. It's why they have a 80,000 PSI round with a steel base. Got to get that 7mm bullet going 3000+ FPS out of a 13 inch barrel somehow.
 
what's even the point of the SIG spear?
The point is that the US Military is stupid
It's for Level IV body armor.
Years ago I wrote a post in this very thread about how in my opinion, without specialized tungsten carbide penetrator ammunition, Military loadings of 6.8x51 with an "Enhanced Performance Round" style copper body and external steel penetrator probably can't penetrate body armor either at all or at any considerable distance.
I have my doubts that the Sig Sauer 6.8x51 Hybrid cartridge is the Armor Obliterator that people on the internet make it out to be
And even if Big Army was able to mass issue tungsten carbide core ammunition (they can't and wouldn't) two things
1. It would be comparatively trivial to make armor that can resist said ammunition, especially at any "real" distance. Adept Armor advertises a 6.5-8lb plate that they claim offers protection against M993 at 3050fps and there is no reason besides cost that "near peer" forces could not copy this technology (it would be trivially easy to acquire one and ship it out of the country for analysis and reverse engineering)
2. Small arms do not win wars, this is not to say that having advanced small arms is stupid, but in the grand scheme of things, small arms really do not matter, for every GoPro video you see of a guy getting hosed down in a Donbass Trench 100 guys are turned into mist by nameless faceless Artillerymen.

So I found this fellow who had made his own Bullpup and it actually is quite an interesting design
1726496684020.png
1726497301531.png

-Dubbed the MBAR (Modular Bullpup Automatic Rifle)
-Two patents filed
-Polymer Lower, 7075 Upper
-Uses standard AR-15/10 bolts, barrels and cam pins.
-Modular magazine wells for STANAG, SR-25, AKM and AK-74 Mags
-Ambidextrous AR controls, Back up magazine and bolt release in the rear
-Downwards ejecting
-Not hammer fired but striker fired.
-F2000 "Breach cut" to allow access to the internals, think of it as a Jam door on ye olde Nerf Gun
-90 parts, 50% are COTS, 25% can be 3D Printed or Injection Moulded and 25% have to be machined
-Short Stroke piston with 3 setting adjustable gas block
-Aside from the recoil and piston spring, EVERY other spring is the same size, same goes for torx screws and roll pins.
-Magwell and trigger group will be open source designs
-Designer wants to license the design to an established manufacturer like DD, KAC or LMT
-Bolt is rotated 90 degrees and the cam is on the right side instead of on top
-OAL is about 30'' with an 18'' barrel
I have serious doubts this will ever make it into production, But I wish all the best towards this guy.

Continuing on the bullpup train
A guy on reddit made a Bullpup conversion lower for FM-15 uppers. Site won't let me copy/paste the pictures so here's a link to the post.
This guy, who was dormant for more than a year, has returned with an update and refined design as well as Jakl compatibility
1726497976848.png

ADS Assault Rifle
1726498485432.png

ADSh "Bars" bullpup by the guy who created the Gepard PDW, might also have been modified to be able to shoot underwater without issue?
1726499280525.png
1726499296419.png
Same guy also created the "Smerch" Design which has a bizzare seemingly mostly wooden construction (this was due to the creator at the time being a student at Tula Higher Artillery Engineering School and was a submission for the trial that eventually produced the AKS-74u)
1726499480701.png

Also made the "Shkval" design that was specially adapted for firing underwater
1726499619368.png
1726499665037.png
Many of you may be aware of the AK-74MB but are you aware of its creator Vitaly Vitalievich Boyarkin and his horrific Norwood?
1726500137319.png
or his AKS-74uB design? (Yes, Bullpup 74u)
1726500177065.png
Bullpup conversion from the Pre-SMO Luhansk People's Republic
1726500454691.png
PRSh machinegun, a a very special PK series bullpup conversion as it was created in collaboration with the Degtyaryov plant itself.
1726502263748.png
Pakistani police officer with FAMAS, what happened here is that a Talib took a FAMAS from a Frenchman, possibly sold it to another guy and said guy sold it to the Policeman.
1726502474097.png

Lastly Russian company Pufgun has created both disintegrating and non-disentegrating Polymer PKM Belts
 
Last edited:
Small arms do not win wars, this is not to say that having advanced small arms is stupid, but in the grand scheme of things, small arms really do not matter, for every GoPro video you see of a guy getting hosed down in a Donbass Trench 100 guys are turned into mist by nameless faceless Artillerymen.
yeah, im no expert, but it does seem that being able to quickly and accurately mass artillery onto a target and having more and better drones than the other guy are more likely to be a deciding factor in modern war than small arms.
 
They already make a subcompact VP 9. I carry the full size, so I have no interest in a smaller one.
True, I was thinking of the sfp9cc/vp9cc they showed off last year:
more-pictures-of-the-sfp9cc-v0-4xt425s1ffob1.jpg
Basically a slimmer version of the vp9sk without the finger grooves. In typical fashion, HK didnt bring it ShotShow 2024 and arent sure whether or not theyre bringing it to the US market. Technically a 'micro-compact', I hate handgun sizing categorization.

Fingers crossed one of HK and Walther release new micros soon.
 
Last edited:
I definitely like the way things are moving, but that thing is too damn expensive for what it is. Seeing his block of plastic he was using as a work rest, I certainly wouldn't play that much for a Delrin trigger piece. Cool thing, but drop it $100-150 and then I'd be interested. A spare leg thing would be nice too
Good on him for going old fashioned with payment/calling him, that should have been an option from the beginning with FRTs, and really any gun stuff.

The Hoffman Super Safety seems like a better option due to being selectable, stainless steel, and 1/3 the price to ¢15 even with fancy filament. Swapping the Regulator is fine and all, but it'd take only one more pin to just totally swap lowers. It also sounds like this thing isn't the most compatible, whereas the Hoffman seems much more versatile.
Yeah, I know people need to make money, but $238 for one is definitely a bit expensive. I agree about the Super Safety being an overall better design, especially due to the dedicated semi-auto function.
 
I am looking at a Model 29-2 8 3/8in and a Model 57 8 3/8. Which one should I get? 44 and 41 magnum. I have never owned either cartridge before but I've always wanted a 29, not because of dirty harry but mad max.

I've owned both. Currently have a Model 57 from 1968 or so with a 6" barrel. I personally prefer .41 Magnum and a lot of the factory loaded ammo can be hotter than factory .44 mag, but .44 mag is definitely easier to find, can fire heavier bullets, and if you go looking for it you can find some really hot ammo from places like Buffalo Bore, Underwood, and boutique loaders like Aria Ballistics. .41 is flatter shooting by a little bit. Either will be great, but .44 is definitely more friendly if you just want to be able to buy ammo easily and take it to the range. .41 mag requires you to be more dedicated.
 
I've owned both. Currently have a Model 57 from 1968 or so with a 6" barrel. I personally prefer .41 Magnum and a lot of the factory loaded ammo can be hotter than factory .44 mag, but .44 mag is definitely easier to find, can fire heavier bullets, and if you go looking for it you can find some really hot ammo from places like Buffalo Bore, Underwood, and boutique loaders like Aria Ballistics. .41 is flatter shooting by a little bit. Either will be great, but .44 is definitely more friendly if you just want to be able to buy ammo easily and take it to the range. .41 mag requires you to be more dedicated.
A 44 is on my wishlist but very far down. 300 win mag is expensive enough already lol. Might get a Charter bulldog though in 44 special for the lulz since the cost of the gun is low. Can't shoot Buffalo Bore 44 special loads, but it would be a 44, just not a 44 magnum, more a 45 ACP in terms of power.
Charter-Arms-Bulldog-2 (1).jpg
Years ago I wrote a post in this very thread about how in my opinion, without specialized tungsten carbide penetrator ammunition, Military loadings of 6.8x51 with an "Enhanced Performance Round" style copper body and external steel penetrator probably can't penetrate body armor either at all or at any considerable distance
Eh. 7mm or "6.8" has good sectional density, better than 7.62/ 30 cal diameter, meaning high penetration on its face. There will probably be a mix of both steel and enhanced tungsten rounds, but steel should be enough for chinesium armor just on raw ballistics.
Fa7IsWJXoAA79n1.jpg_large.jpg
 
300 win mag is expensive enough already lol. Might get a Charter bulldog though in 44 special for the lulz since the cost of the gun is low.
Guy you need to get your shit together, I shouldn't have to break this down into the four separate problem statements involved but you seem like you need help;
>"300 win mag is expensive enough already" to put off 44 magnum but wanting a 44 special when 44 mag is cheaper
>wanting a Charter bulldog
>wanting 44 special
>wanting a Charter bulldog
because it's cheap
 
Guy you need to get your shit together, I shouldn't have to break this down into the four separate problem statements involved but you seem like you need help;
>"300 win mag is expensive enough already" to put off 44 magnum but wanting a 44 special when 44 mag is cheaper
>wanting a Charter bulldog
>wanting 44 special
>wanting a Charter bulldog
because it's cheap
I said the gun is cheap lol but you are right about the ammo. Eh what can I say? I want a lot of guns lol.
 
Back
Top Bottom