- Joined
- Oct 28, 2014
Pretending to be someone from a games company to try to trick Chris is the next step above writing "This guy makes GOOD autistics like me look bad!" in the comments on an archived Chris video.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm starting a general thread for various attempted weenery during the time I was communicating with Chris.
These first two selections happened sometime around January 27th, 2014 and were sent to "Rebeckah".
Chris never sent part 2 of the Satoshi Taijiri message, so the first part is all I can show.
Both of these attempts were foiled. I'll post more as I continue to dig through my archives.
Edit: I didn't bother to censor the fake Tiffany account because this was over a year ago and the account is probably long since gone.
just gonna drop this here:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=SZyS7SDVyMQi swear the kid at the end is bluespike.
Why not ask him? He seems to be posting in this PVCC thread on /cow/.just gonna drop this here:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=SZyS7SDVyMQi swear the kid at the end is bluespike.
...someone lock this thread please. This is why we can't have nice things. Couldn't just have a funny thread full of trolling fails could we?![]()
Remember that time where Jenkins tried to break into Patty's Crypt.Here's a funny trolling fail
![]()
Temp lock while I clean up the autism. We have a trolling debate thread, people.
EDIT: Thread reopened. 47 deleted posts in a 4-page thread. Let's not derail like that again.
I normally keep quiet on such matters but this isn't the first time you have waded in and called people autistic. P-logic made an observation that posters are quick to call out the stupidity of these failed attempts despite Thetan doing the exact same thing. I quoted him and agreed stating that the lines between a ween and a troll seem to be dependent on who is doing the "trolling" these days.
I don't know what happened between my post and now because I was out on a Friday night like a normal adult but nowhere in those two posts was a question of the ethics of trolling. They are flat observations that would be off topic in the other thread that has "autism" in it that hasn't been touched.
P-logic made an observation that posters are quick to call out the stupidity of these failed attempts despite Thetan doing the exact same thing. I quoted him and agreed stating that the lines between a ween and a troll seem to be dependent on who is doing the "trolling" these days.
I don't know what happened between my post and now
I was out on a Friday night like a normal adult
this isn't the first time you have waded in and called people autistic
Well, maybe, but that's not really my point. I'm not trying to make any kind of moral argument here. I'm just trying to make the point that Chris trolling has always been tightly controlled by a small group of people who will shut down any trolling attempts from outsiders if they are able.
Was Tiffany the only one he was considering approaching in real life or did he have enough info to go after the others?
It's both funny and sad how oblivious he is to the implications of having to use a "people finder" service to track down somebody he once knew because he can't get in contact with them otherwise.The Tiffany attempt was derailed because the person involved was actively encouraging Chris to pursue her, to the point where Chris was considering just showing up at her place of work. He was also, as I mentioned previously, using those "people finder" sites to look up other gal-pals.
He was looking for info on the others using those "people finder" services. I don't know how far along he got with the others because he never said much about it after "Rebeckah" made it pretty clear that she disapproved.
Those services can get somewhat pricey as well (a background check runs around $50), so he may have stopped because of that.
He tried to contact a few of the gal pals via Facebook, and was promptly blocked (which speaks volumes about the gal pals attitude towards Chris).
Well, he doesn't care that they don't want to talk to him, or what they want in general. He needs to show them that they're wrong.Did he try to "people find" anyone after they had blocked him on facebook? That would up the creepy factor a lot.
I guess I am trying to figure out whether the people finding was motivated by not being able to find even an email adress or facebook account (which is not entirely unreasonable) or because he had basic contact info and wanted more details to try to circumvent blocks (which is super creepy).
I was going to save this exchange: it's one of the more interesting ween attempts and shows some real dedication.
The lawyer's office in question was legit, but they specialized in DUI and Personal Injury Law. I contacted them and they confirmed that they never sent the C & D letter (or the other correspondence). (The person I spoke to seemed oddly amused by the whole thing.)
The email is interesting because, during the time "Megan's Lawyer" was trying to troll Chris, another ween was pretending to be Megan at the same time (sort of a ween trolling ween thing).
Chris forwarded the correspondence to Rob Bell, who also confirmed it for a fake.
View attachment 15107 View attachment 15108 View attachment 15109 View attachment 15110 View attachment 15111