Misc Failed Trolling Attempts

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Pretending to be someone from a games company to try to trick Chris is the next step above writing "This guy makes GOOD autistics like me look bad!" in the comments on an archived Chris video.
 
I'm starting a general thread for various attempted weenery during the time I was communicating with Chris.

These first two selections happened sometime around January 27th, 2014 and were sent to "Rebeckah".

Chris never sent part 2 of the Satoshi Taijiri message, so the first part is all I can show.

Both of these attempts were foiled. I'll post more as I continue to dig through my archives.

Edit: I didn't bother to censor the fake Tiffany account because this was over a year ago and the account is probably long since gone.
just gonna drop this here:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=SZyS7SDVyMQi swear the kid at the end is bluespike.

This thread is great: is full of cringeful memories, weenery stupidity, and shameful idiocracy. And for some reason I'm addicted to it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That fucking weencall always gives me the douche-chills, and to this day I still can't finish it all the way through without clicking away. Oof.
 
...someone lock this thread please. This is why we can't have nice things. Couldn't just have a funny thread full of trolling fails could we? :(

Here's a funny trolling fail

Fatjenkins.jpg
 
I'd like to hear about failed Trolling attempts of Marvin and Alec, too. They have spilled some info here and there, but I don't know if they ever shared failed plans in a bigger scale. That or plans they stopped due to other reasons (like Bob's death).
 
Temp lock while I clean up the autism. We have a trolling debate thread, people.

EDIT: Thread reopened. 47 deleted posts in a 4-page thread. Let's not derail like that again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Temp lock while I clean up the autism. We have a trolling debate thread, people.

EDIT: Thread reopened. 47 deleted posts in a 4-page thread. Let's not derail like that again.

I normally keep quiet on such matters but this isn't the first time you have waded in and called people autistic. P-logic made an observation that posters are quick to call out the stupidity of these failed attempts despite Thetan doing the exact same thing. I quoted him and agreed stating that the lines between a ween and a troll seem to be dependent on who is doing the "trolling" these days.

I don't know what happened between my post and now because I was out on a Friday night like a normal adult but nowhere in those two posts was a question of the ethics of trolling. They are flat observations that would be off topic in the other thread that has "autism" in it that hasn't been touched.
 
I normally keep quiet on such matters but this isn't the first time you have waded in and called people autistic. P-logic made an observation that posters are quick to call out the stupidity of these failed attempts despite Thetan doing the exact same thing. I quoted him and agreed stating that the lines between a ween and a troll seem to be dependent on who is doing the "trolling" these days.

I don't know what happened between my post and now because I was out on a Friday night like a normal adult but nowhere in those two posts was a question of the ethics of trolling. They are flat observations that would be off topic in the other thread that has "autism" in it that hasn't been touched.

The difference between trolling and weening is an interesting topic, and does get discussed in the trolling "ethics" thread.

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/trolling-ethics-debate-thread.6446/
 
P-logic made an observation that posters are quick to call out the stupidity of these failed attempts despite Thetan doing the exact same thing. I quoted him and agreed stating that the lines between a ween and a troll seem to be dependent on who is doing the "trolling" these days.

Which is already borderline off-topic in a light thread meant to poke fun at the more ridiculous attempts at trolling Chris.

I don't know what happened between my post and now

It devolved into utter shit, with P-Logic falling into his normal 'inner-circle' bashing schtick and everything getting derailed all to hell and gone. Multiple posts even pointed out how bad it had gotten, and I elected to excise a large portion of the thread to save it instead of locking it and calling it dead as Marvin was feeling inclined to do.

I was out on a Friday night like a normal adult

You're grumpy at me calling people autistic, then you get snipey. Also, for people in the US it was Thursday night anyway, so not a lot of folks would be going out.

this isn't the first time you have waded in and called people autistic

People are pretty damn autistic. When Null turned me purple it was because Discussion had gotten so riddled with the dread disease that he locked the entire board and was contemplating leaving it that way. I like to think that he hasn't had to think about taking drastic measures like that since.
 
Well, maybe, but that's not really my point. I'm not trying to make any kind of moral argument here. I'm just trying to make the point that Chris trolling has always been tightly controlled by a small group of people who will shut down any trolling attempts from outsiders if they are able.

That's not true. I was once an outsider but, most likely because of sheer luck / chance, I managed to make contact and have some fairly decent interactions with Chris (and the rest is history).

Now to get back on-topic.

The Tiffany attempt was derailed because the person involved was actively encouraging Chris to pursue her, to the point where Chris was considering just showing up at her place of work. He was also, as I mentioned previously, using those "people finder" sites to look up other gal-pals.

Other such attempts were derailed for similar reasons, it wasn't because of some sort of Inner Circle gate keeper conspiracy thing.

Note to @Hellblazer: I only replied to this because I felt that an explanation for the outing of the fake Tiffany was on-topic in the context of the thread.
 
Was Tiffany the only one he was considering approaching in real life or did he have enough info to go after the others?
 
Was Tiffany the only one he was considering approaching in real life or did he have enough info to go after the others?

He was looking for info on the others using those "people finder" services. I don't know how far along he got with the others because he never said much about it after "Rebeckah" made it pretty clear that she disapproved.

Those services can get somewhat pricey as well (a background check runs around $50), so he may have stopped because of that.

He tried to contact a few of the gal pals via Facebook, and was promptly blocked (which speaks volumes about the gal pals attitude towards Chris).
 
The Tiffany attempt was derailed because the person involved was actively encouraging Chris to pursue her, to the point where Chris was considering just showing up at her place of work. He was also, as I mentioned previously, using those "people finder" sites to look up other gal-pals.
It's both funny and sad how oblivious he is to the implications of having to use a "people finder" service to track down somebody he once knew because he can't get in contact with them otherwise.
 
He was looking for info on the others using those "people finder" services. I don't know how far along he got with the others because he never said much about it after "Rebeckah" made it pretty clear that she disapproved.

Those services can get somewhat pricey as well (a background check runs around $50), so he may have stopped because of that.

He tried to contact a few of the gal pals via Facebook, and was promptly blocked (which speaks volumes about the gal pals attitude towards Chris).

Did he try to "people find" anyone after they had blocked him on facebook? That would up the creepy factor a lot.

I guess I am trying to figure out whether the people finding was motivated by not being able to find even an email adress or facebook account (which is not entirely unreasonable) or because he had basic contact info and wanted more details to try to circumvent blocks (which is super creepy).
 
Did he try to "people find" anyone after they had blocked him on facebook? That would up the creepy factor a lot.

I guess I am trying to figure out whether the people finding was motivated by not being able to find even an email adress or facebook account (which is not entirely unreasonable) or because he had basic contact info and wanted more details to try to circumvent blocks (which is super creepy).
Well, he doesn't care that they don't want to talk to him, or what they want in general. He needs to show them that they're wrong.
 
I was going to save this exchange: it's one of the more interesting ween attempts and shows some real dedication.

The lawyer's office in question was legit, but they specialized in DUI and Personal Injury Law. I contacted them and they confirmed that they never sent the C & D letter (or the other correspondence). (The person I spoke to seemed oddly amused by the whole thing.)

The email is interesting because, during the time "Megan's Lawyer" was trying to troll Chris, another ween was pretending to be Megan at the same time (sort of a ween trolling ween thing).

Chris forwarded the correspondence to Rob Bell, who also confirmed it for a fake.

CeaseAndDesistPart1_redacted.jpg CeaseAndDesistPart2_redacted.jpg CeaseAndDesistPart3_redacted.jpg FakeLawyerLetterPart1_redacted.png FakeLawyerLetterPart2_redacted.png
 
I was going to save this exchange: it's one of the more interesting ween attempts and shows some real dedication.

The lawyer's office in question was legit, but they specialized in DUI and Personal Injury Law. I contacted them and they confirmed that they never sent the C & D letter (or the other correspondence). (The person I spoke to seemed oddly amused by the whole thing.)

The email is interesting because, during the time "Megan's Lawyer" was trying to troll Chris, another ween was pretending to be Megan at the same time (sort of a ween trolling ween thing).

Chris forwarded the correspondence to Rob Bell, who also confirmed it for a fake.

View attachment 15107 View attachment 15108 View attachment 15109 View attachment 15110 View attachment 15111

Surely it's treading on the line of legality to do something like that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom